Why was the LHC required to find the Higgs?


by copernicus1
Tags: higgs, required
copernicus1
copernicus1 is offline
#1
Oct19-13, 02:23 PM
P: 82
If the Higgs is around 126 GeV, why was the LHC required to find it, when the Tevatron is capable of 1 TeV collisions and had already found the top quark which is quite a bit heavier? Is this because of something special about proton-proton collisions?

Thanks!

PS Please don't say "they did see the Higgs at the Tevatron!" I'm aware of those results, but clearly there must've been some reason why the LHC was thought to be more effective in discovering this particle.
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
The hemihelix: Scientists discover a new shape using rubber bands (w/ video)
Mapping the road to quantum gravity
Chameleon crystals could enable active camouflage (w/ video)
mpv_plate
mpv_plate is offline
#2
Oct19-13, 02:38 PM
P: 87
It is more difficult to see the Higgs particle in the noise. Identifying the top quark is easier than identifying the Higgs. So you need a collider with higher luminosity, which is the LHC.

Regarding the Higgs being "found" at the Tevatron: I don't think they had 5 sigma significance to declare a discovery.
RGevo
RGevo is online now
#3
Oct19-13, 04:52 PM
P: 81
Also, at the LHC the production is dominated by gluon fusion process via top loop.

With higher energy hadrons (3.5, 4 TeV) the gluon Parton distribution function is larger and thus the cross section increases.

Also Lhc detectors are newer technology, so in general better

mfb
mfb is offline
#4
Oct19-13, 07:27 PM
Mentor
P: 10,861

Why was the LHC required to find the Higgs?


Tevatron and LHC cross-sections
The plot is older than the discovery, so there is no line for 126 GeV, but 150 GeV is close enough. At the LHC, the cross-section is more than an order of magnitude larger (even with 7 and 8 TeV), and at the same time the LHC collected more collisions (25/fb integrated luminosity, while the Tevatron experiments got 10/fb). This means the LHC experiments had ~50 times more Higgs particles, with just ~2.5 times more background.
And the LHC detectors are better, of course.

Antiproton-proton collisions would have been even better, but at the LHC energy, that does not matter so much any more.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
How do you find out energy required per day? Medical Sciences 7
Is the higgs field required to have space-time warping? Special & General Relativity 9
How many inverse femtobarns at 7 TeV to find Higgs? High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 12
Hawking Bets $100 the LHC Will Not Find The Higgs General Discussion 31
How would we find the Higgs if Higgs did not coupe to fermions? High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 24