How Can We Obtain Frame-Free Vector Derivative?

In summary, the conversation discusses the possibility of expressing the \nabla operator in terms of a frame, and its reciprocal frame by using vector coordinates. Hestenes and Sobczyk present a frame-free definition of \nabla by first defining the directional derivative of a function, and then defining the differential of the function. The conversation then discusses the possibility of obtaining the derivative in a frame-free manner, and provides an example using orthonormal frames. It is concluded that while it may be easier to evaluate using frames, the chain rule allows for a more elegant and frame-independent approach.
  • #1
kryptyk
41
0
In vector analysis, it is possible to express the [tex]\nabla[/tex] operator in terms of a frame[tex]\{\mathbf{e}_1, \mathbf{e}_2, ..., \mathbf{e}_n\}[/tex] and its reciprocal frame [tex]\{\mathbf{e}^1, \mathbf{e}^2, ..., \mathbf{e}^n\}[/tex] by:

[tex]\nabla = \sum_{k=1}^n \mathbf{e}^k \frac{\partial}{\partial x^k}[/tex]

where [tex]x^k[/tex] are the vector coordinates for frame [tex]\{\mathbf{e}_k\}[/tex]:

[tex]\mathbf{x} = \sum_{k=1}^n x^k \mathbf{e}_k[/tex]

Hestenes and Sobczyk[84] instead present a frame-free definition of [tex]\nabla[/tex] by first defining the directional derivative of some function of a vector via:

[tex](\mathbf{a}\cdot\nabla_{\mathbf{x}})F(\mathbf{x}) = \lim_{\tau\rightarrow 0}\frac{F(\mathbf{x} + \tau \mathbf{a})-F(\mathbf{x})}{\tau}[/tex]

They then define the differential of [tex]F[/tex] by:

[tex]\underline{F}(\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{a}) = (\mathbf{a}\cdot\nabla_{\mathbf{x}})F(\mathbf{x})[/tex]

from which they then claim we can obtain the derivative of [tex]F[/tex] with respect to the vector [tex]\mathbf{x}[/tex] by:

[tex]\nabla_{\mathbf{x}} F(\mathbf{x}) = \nabla_{\mathbf{a}}(\mathbf{a}\cdot\nabla_{\mathbf{x}})F(\mathbf{x}) = \nabla_{\mathbf{a}} \underline{F}(\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{a})[/tex]

I just don't understand how this last equation allows us to obtain the derivative in a frame-free manner. I still find it necessary to introduce a frame and use partial derivatives. Once the derivative has been evaluated, the frame-dependence can be removed. For example, let

[tex]F(\mathbf{x})=|\mathbf{x}|^r[/tex],

then

[tex]\nabla F = \sum_{k=1}^n \mathbf{e}^k \frac{\partial}{\partial x^k}F(x^1, x^2, ..., x^n)[/tex]

For orthonormal frame [tex]\{\mathbf{e}_k\}[/tex] we can write:

[tex]F(\mathbf{x}) = |\mathbf{x}|^r = |(x^1)^2 + (x^2)^2 + ... + (x^n)^2|^{\frac{r}{2}}[/tex]

where [tex](x^k)^2[/tex] means the square of the kth component and the [tex]k[/tex] is not to be interpreted as an exponent. (Yes, this notation is a bit ugly but it seems to be quite engrained in the literature.)

Since [tex]\{\mathbf{e}_k\}[/tex] is an orthonormal frame, for Euclidean spaces we have [tex]\mathbf{e}^k = \mathbf{e}_k[/tex] and so

[tex]\mathbf{e}^k \frac{\partial}{\partial x^k}|(x^1)^2 + (x^2)^2 + ... + (x^n)^2|^{\frac{r}{2}} = r |\mathbf{x}|^{r-2} x^k \mathbf{e}^k = r |\mathbf{x}|^{r-2} x^k \mathbf{e}_k[/tex]

thus,

[tex]\nabla_{\mathbf{x}} |\mathbf{x}|^r = \sum_{k=1}^n r |\mathbf{x}|^{r-2} x^k \mathbf{e}_k = r |\mathbf{x}|^{r-2} \mathbf{x}[/tex]

and so we finally arrive at a frame-free expression for the derivative.

Can this evaluation be carried out in a completely frame-free manner? Would such an approach easily generalize to any frame-independent function of [tex]\mathbf{x}[/tex]? I'm finding it easier to just evaluate them like I did here - but it seems perhaps by means of the chain rule it can be done more elegantly without mention of frames at all.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It always depends on what you want to use it for. Of course you need coordinates (a frame) whenever you actually calculate something. The notation with the nabla operator is per se frame-free - and sufficient if we are interested in the transformation it expresses rather than the numbers it spits out at a certain point for a certain function.
 

1. What is a frame-free vector derivative?

A frame-free vector derivative is a mathematical concept that describes how a vector changes as it moves along a curve or surface. Unlike traditional vector derivatives, which are dependent on a specific coordinate system or frame of reference, a frame-free vector derivative is independent of any particular frame, making it more versatile and applicable to a wider range of problems.

2. How is a frame-free vector derivative different from a regular vector derivative?

A regular vector derivative is dependent on the coordinate system or frame of reference in which it is defined, meaning that it will change depending on how the coordinate system is oriented or transformed. A frame-free vector derivative, on the other hand, is defined without any reference to a specific coordinate system, so it remains the same regardless of how the coordinate system is changed or rotated.

3. What applications does a frame-free vector derivative have?

Frame-free vector derivatives have applications in many fields of science and engineering, including physics, computer graphics, and robotics. They can be used to describe the motion of objects in space, to analyze the behavior of fluids and other continuous systems, and to calculate the forces and torques acting on a rigid body.

4. How is a frame-free vector derivative calculated?

A frame-free vector derivative is calculated using a mathematical concept called a connection, which describes how a vector changes as it moves along a curve or surface. The connection can be defined in terms of a set of basis vectors, which are independent of any particular frame of reference. The frame-free vector derivative is then calculated using the basis vectors and the derivative of the vector in terms of these basis vectors.

5. What are the benefits of using a frame-free vector derivative?

One of the main benefits of using a frame-free vector derivative is its versatility and applicability to a wide range of problems. Since it is independent of any particular coordinate system, it can be used in different frames of reference without the need for complex transformations. Additionally, because it is defined using a connection, it can be extended to higher dimensions and more complex systems, making it a powerful tool for analyzing and describing physical phenomena.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
336
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • Calculus
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
2
Views
883
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top