simple gravity question


by joshmccraney
Tags: gravity, simple
joshmccraney
joshmccraney is offline
#1
May20-13, 04:45 AM
P: 227
hey all!

can anyone please explain where the equation [itex]{Gmm_e}/{r^2}={mgR^2/r^2}[/itex] comes from given $$ma=Gmm_e/r^2$$ where [itex]G,m,m_e[/itex] are the universal gravity constant, mass of object, earth's mass and [itex]r[/itex] is the distance from center of earths mass and [itex]R[/itex] is radius of earth

thanks!
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Physicists design quantum switches which can be activated by single photons
'Dressed' laser aimed at clouds may be key to inducing rain, lightning
Higher-order nonlinear optical processes observed using the SACLA X-ray free-electron laser
sweet springs
sweet springs is offline
#2
May20-13, 05:03 AM
P: 449
Quote Quote by joshmccraney View Post
hey all!

can anyone please explain where the equation [itex]{Gmm_e}/{r^2}={mgR^2/r^2}[/itex] comes from given $$ma=Gmm_e/r^2$$ where [itex]G,m,m_e[/itex] are the universal gravity constant, mass of object, earth's mass and [itex]r[/itex] is the distance from center of earths mass and [itex]R[/itex] is radius of earth

thanks!

Hi.

[itex]{Gmm_e}/{r^2}={mgR^2/r^2}[/itex] means [itex]\frac{Gm_e}{R^2}=g[/itex]
g is acccelation by earth on the surface.
joshmccraney
joshmccraney is offline
#3
May20-13, 11:07 PM
P: 227
Quote Quote by sweet springs View Post
Hi.

[itex]{Gmm_e}/{r^2}={mgR^2/r^2}[/itex] means [itex]\frac{Gm_e}{R^2}=g[/itex]
g is acccelation by earth on the surface.
yes this is true from algebraic manipulation but where does the identity come from?

sweet springs
sweet springs is offline
#4
May20-13, 11:22 PM
P: 449

simple gravity question


Hi.

Acceleration on earth's surface is given by g.
Force acting on mass m is mg by Newton's law.
joshmccraney
joshmccraney is offline
#5
May22-13, 10:40 PM
P: 227
Quote Quote by sweet springs View Post
Hi.

Acceleration on earth's surface is given by g.
Force acting on mass m is mg by Newton's law.
yes, i understand this but where does the initial equality derive from???
Shyan
Shyan is offline
#6
May22-13, 10:52 PM
Shyan's Avatar
P: 734
[itex]
F=\frac{GM_e m}{r^2} \\
g=\frac{GM_e}{R_e^2} \\
F=\frac{GM_e}{R_e^2} \frac{m R_e^2}{r^2} \Rightarrow F=\frac{gmR_e^2}{r^2}
[/itex]
amiras
amiras is offline
#7
May23-13, 05:43 AM
P: 64
According to Newton's 2nd law we know that when the force of magnitude F act's upon an object of mass m it causes a body to accelerate at a. F=ma, in case of the gravitational force with is [itex]F=G\frac{mM}{r^2}[/itex] it is usual to denote this acceleration g so:

[itex]F=mg=G\frac{mM}{r^2}[/itex], dividing by mass gives your expression.
BruceW
BruceW is offline
#8
May23-13, 09:20 AM
HW Helper
BruceW's Avatar
P: 3,337
Quote Quote by joshmccraney View Post
yes this is true from algebraic manipulation but where does the identity come from?
eh? we start by defining
[tex]\frac{Gm_e}{R^2}=g[/tex]
Then we get the identity.
Zag
Zag is online now
#9
May23-13, 10:42 PM
Zag's Avatar
P: 36
joshmccraney, the equality comes from the fact that close to the Earth's surface the gravitational force can be regarded as being approximately constant, i.e., as not depending on distance as measured from the ground.

It is easy to see this if you expand the gravitational force in a Taylor Series around [itex]R_{E}[/itex], where [itex]R_{E}[/itex] is the radius of the Earth. If you do that, you will get the following series:

[itex]F(R_{E} + r ) = \frac{GM_e m}{( R_{E} + r )^2} = \frac{GM_e m}{R_{E}^2} + \frac{-2}{1!}\frac{GM_e m}{R_{E}^3}r + \frac{6}{2!}\frac{GM_e m}{R_{E}^4}r^2 + \centerdot\centerdot\centerdot[/itex]

So this is an expression for the graviational force close to the Earth's surface, being [itex]r[/itex] just the distance or height you measure from the ground.

Ok, we now we have this infinite series, which looks kind of weird because we wouldn't like to calculate infinite terms to get the actual value of the force near the planet's surface. But, take a closer look at the terms of the expansion and you will see that all of them can be written as the first term multiplied by a constant times [itex]( \frac{r}{R_{E}} )^n[/itex], with [itex]n ≥ 1[/itex] being an integer. How big is that number? We know that [itex]R_{E} ≈ 6.410^6 m[/itex], and say [itex]r ≈ 100m[/itex]. If you plug these values into the expression you get:

[itex]( \frac{r}{R_{E}} )^n = ( \frac{100}{6.410^6} )^n ≈ 10^{-5n}[/itex]

This means that the second term of the expansion (for which [itex]n=1[/itex]) will make a correction to the fisrt term on the fifth decimal place - it's a very small correction! For the third term ( [itex]n = 2[/itex] ), for instance, the correction is even smaller since it would take place on the tenth decimal place! We conclude then that all these terms (from the second on) are too small for our purposes, since we are interested on the graviational force on the surface's neighborhood. We can then discard these terms and keep just the first one:

[itex]F(R_{E} + r ) = \frac{GM_e m}{R_{E}^2}[/itex]

Now, because we don't like to write all these constants, we simply define [itex]g = \frac{GM_e}{R_{E}^2}[/itex] and get the famous expression we all learn in high school:

[itex]F = mg[/itex]

Best,
Zag


Register to reply

Related Discussions
simple question about gravity. High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 2
Simple question regarding gravity General Physics 8
Simple gravity question? Introductory Physics Homework 8
Simple Gravity Question Astrophysics 2
A simple question about gravity. Classical Physics 3