Complete theory ever complete?

In summary, the conversation discusses the theoretical existence of a TOE that can predict all experimental results at all scales. However, there are still questions regarding its accuracy and ability to predict future phenomena. These challenges may lead to modifications and even a completely different version of the TOE in the future. Therefore, even if a TOE is discovered, it may not truly be the theory of everything.

Is a complete theory of everything ever 'complete'

  • Yes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Don't know

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    2
  • #1
pivoxa15
2,255
1
Suppose we did (for the first time) have a TOE that theoretically predicts all the experimental results to date on all sclaes of size.

However two things are still in question:
1. How accuately does it predict everything (that have been experimentally carried thus far) at all scales?

2. How accurately can it explain or predict further phenomena ?Both questions will challenge the TOE and forever modify it to the point where some time after the first TOE is invented, the latter ones may be very different to the first one i.e use entirely different mathematics. So in that way even if we have a TOE, it is not literally the theory of everything.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3


I would first like to commend the effort and ambition behind creating a theory of everything (TOE). It is a daunting task and one that has been pursued by many researchers for decades.

However, I must also point out that science is a constantly evolving field and there is no such thing as a "complete theory". The very nature of science is to continuously question and refine our understanding of the world around us. Therefore, even if we were to develop a TOE that accurately predicts all experimental results at all scales, it is not a guarantee that it will remain accurate in the future.

Your two questions are valid and important considerations when it comes to any scientific theory. The accuracy of predictions and the ability to explain new phenomena are crucial in determining the validity and usefulness of a theory. As you mentioned, these challenges will require modifications and updates to the TOE, potentially leading to a completely different version in the future.

In addition, it is also worth noting that a TOE is not a standalone theory. It must be consistent with all other well-established theories in physics and must be able to explain and unify them. This is a difficult task and one that may require further revisions and adjustments.

In conclusion, while a TOE may be a significant achievement in the field of science, it is not a complete theory in the literal sense. It will always be subject to further testing, refinement, and potential modifications. As scientists, we must continue to strive for a deeper understanding of the universe and be open to the possibility of new theories that may challenge our current understanding.
 

1. What is the "Complete theory ever complete"?

The "Complete theory ever complete" is a scientific theory that proposes to explain all phenomena in the universe, from the smallest subatomic particles to the largest structures in the cosmos. It aims to unify all the fundamental forces of nature and provide a comprehensive understanding of the universe.

2. Who came up with the "Complete theory ever complete"?

The "Complete theory ever complete" was first proposed by the renowned physicist Albert Einstein. He spent his later years trying to develop a unified field theory, which he believed would be the ultimate theory of everything.

3. Has the "Complete theory ever complete" been proven?

No, the "Complete theory ever complete" has not been proven yet. Many scientists are still working on developing a complete and consistent theory that can explain all the fundamental forces and laws of nature. While there have been significant advancements, a complete theory of everything is still elusive.

4. What are the challenges in developing the "Complete theory ever complete"?

One of the biggest challenges in developing the "Complete theory ever complete" is reconciling the two pillars of modern physics - general relativity and quantum mechanics. These theories have been successful in explaining different aspects of the universe, but they are fundamentally incompatible. Other challenges include the lack of experimental evidence and the complexity of the mathematical equations involved.

5. Why is the "Complete theory ever complete" important?

The "Complete theory ever complete" is essential because it would provide a complete understanding of the universe and its workings. It would also help us develop new technologies and make groundbreaking advancements in various fields, such as medicine, energy, and space exploration. Additionally, a complete theory of everything would satisfy our innate curiosity about the universe and our place in it.

Similar threads

  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
6
Replies
190
Views
9K
Replies
14
Views
847
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
47
Views
4K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
0
Views
728
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top