Calculating Average Speed and Distance Traveled with Constant Acceleration

  • Thread starter Sephfire
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses the calculation of average speed and distance traveled for an object with constant acceleration. The speaker's professor suggests using the equation (Vf + Vo) / 2, but the speaker does not understand how this results in an average speed of 8 m/s when the object only travels at 8 m/s for two instances. The speaker suggests using a split method to solve the problem and argues that it makes more sense. The conversation also touches upon the concepts of velocity and speed, with the speaker clarifying the difference between the two. Ultimately, it is determined that both the speaker and their professor are correct, but there was a misunderstanding due to mixing up velocity and speed. The final conclusion is that the displacement is
  • #1
Sephfire
2
0
I've had trouble with this for a while, and I asked my professor about it today but it still doesn't really make sense.

Let's say an object moves with an initial velocity of 8 m/s for two seconds, ending with a final velocity of -8 m/s (with a constant acceleration).

At 0 seconds, velocity is 8 m/s
At 1 second, velocity is 0 m/s
At 2 seconds, velocity is -8 m/s

How do I correctly calculate the average speed and distance traveled?

My professor told me that you can simply use the equation (Vf + Vo) / 2 to calculate it since it has a constant acceleration, and this comes out to be 8 m/s. This doesn't make sense to me, because it is only traveling at 8 m/s at the beginning instant and final instant of the motion. Average speed is the speed the object traveled on average during the motion, and I don't see how it would be an average of 8 if it was only 8 for two instances. It seems like it should be lower.

Also, to find the distance traveled, you can simply multiply the average speed by the time interval. If I go with what my professor says the average speed is (8 m/s) then it would simply be 8 * 2 = 16m.

However, if you split the problem into two parts and find the distance traveled from t0 to t1, and t1 to t2, you get average speeds of 4 m/s for each part which results in a combined distance of only 8m. The split method is the one I used to solve the problem because it makes more sense to me.

So, am I right or is my professor right? If I'm wrong, please explain extremely clearly how I'm wrong because I'm really not getting it.

I'd like to add another note down here that it seems illogical to me that an object that travels with a constant velocity of 8 m/s over two seconds will have an average speed of 8 m/s, and an object that begins at 8 m/s, slows down, then speeds up again to 8 m/s will also have an average speed of 8 m/s.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Sephfire said:
I've had trouble with this for a while, and I asked my professor about it today but it still doesn't really make sense.

Let's say an object moves with an initial velocity of 8 m/s for two seconds, ending with a final velocity of -8 m/s (with a constant acceleration).

At 0 seconds, velocity is 8 m/s
At 1 second, velocity is 0 m/s
At 2 seconds, velocity is -8 m/s

How do I correctly calculate the average speed and distance traveled?

My professor told me that you can simply use the equation (Vf + Vo) / 2 to calculate it since it has a constant acceleration, and this comes out to be 8 m/s.

I would say the average velocity = (V_f + V_o)/2 = (+8 + (-8))/2 = (+8 - 8)/2 = 0/2 = 0.

a velocity with a negative sign will have the opposite direction of a velocity with a
positive sign.
Velocity and displacement will work in all the usual constant acceleration equations.

you only have (average speed) = (average velocity) or (distance traveled) = (final position) - (starting position) for motion that always has the same direction.
It is correct to split the time interval in 2 parts, so the velocity has the same direction in each part. .
 
  • #3
Okay, but I said speed, not velocity... and also distance, not displacement. =/
 
  • #4
Hmm, from what I understand, you are mixing up velocity and speed. See, velocity is displacement/time, while speed is distance/time. Since displacement is the length between the starting position of your object and it's final position, your object did 0 displacement over a period of 2 seconds, thus, your object's average velocity is 0/2 = 0m/s (keep in mind that it went 8m in one direction then 8m in the opposite direction, which put it back in it's starting position, as indicated by your - sign). However, since distance is the total length moved by your object (regardless of positions or directions), your object moved 8m + 8m= 16m, which divided by 2 to get the average speed is 8m/s. So, both you and your prof. are correct, just a simple matter of miscommunication, I think. Then again, I am only 16 years old, and only took high school physics, so I am not sure if I am correct.
 
  • #5
The displacement is zero.
The distance traveled is 8 meters
The average velocity is zero.
The average speed is 4 m/s.

Hint: When caculating the distance travelled, first find the velocity zero crossing and then consider the positive and the negative velocity regions seperately.
 
Last edited:

1. What is the definition of a seemingly simple problem?

A seemingly simple problem refers to a situation or issue that appears to have a straightforward solution, but in reality, requires more complex and critical thinking to solve.

2. How do you identify a seemingly simple problem?

A seemingly simple problem can be identified by examining the initial assumptions and solutions that are proposed. If the problem persists or new issues arise, it may actually be a more complex problem.

3. Why are seemingly simple problems often difficult to solve?

Seemingly simple problems can be difficult to solve because they often involve multiple layers and hidden complexities. Additionally, our initial assumptions and biases can hinder us from seeing the problem in its entirety.

4. How can you approach solving a seemingly simple problem?

To effectively solve a seemingly simple problem, it is important to thoroughly analyze and question the initial assumptions and potential solutions. It can also be helpful to seek outside perspectives and gather more information about the problem.

5. Can seemingly simple problems have significant impacts?

Yes, seemingly simple problems can have significant impacts as they can often lead to larger issues if not properly addressed. They can also cause frustration and wasted time if not solved efficiently.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
882
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
720
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
38
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
38
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
19
Views
466
Back
Top