Induction seems to not work?

So each of 23n and 31n has a remainder of 1 when divided by 48. That means that 23n+ 31n has a remainder of 2 when divided by 48. That is, 23n+ 31n= 48q+ 2 for some integer q. So 23n+ 31n+ 46= 48q+ 48- 2= 48(q- 1)+ 46 so has a remainder of 46 when divided by 48.
  • #1
rock.freak667
Homework Helper
6,223
31

Homework Statement



Prove by mathematical induction,or otherwise,that [itex]23^{2n}+31^{2n}+46[/itex] is divisible by 48 for all [itex]n \geq 0[/itex]

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Assume true for n=N

[tex]23^{2N}+31^{2N}+46=48A[/tex]

[tex] \times (23^2 + 31^2)[/tex]

[tex]23^{2N+2}+31^{2N+2}+46(23^2 + 31^2)+23^2(31^{2N})+31^2(23^{2N})=48A(23^2 + 31^2)[/tex]


[tex]23^{2N+2}+31^{2N+2}+68540+31^{2N}(528+1)+23^{2N}(960+1)=48A(23^2 + 31^2)[/tex]

Simplifying gives me what I need, i.e. things divible by 48, but 68540 is not...any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Everything is not supposed to be divisible by 48. You can drop the things that are, of course. Now you just want to show 68540+31^(2N)+23^(2N) gives a remainder of 46 when divided by 48. BTW, it's easier without induction. Just observe 23^2 and 31^2 are both equal to 1 mod 48.
 
  • #3
Code:
[tex]23^{2N}+31^{2N}+46=48A[/tex]

correct

[tex] \times (23^2 + 31^2)[/tex]

what's this doing there? if this is a part of the first equation ...


at n+1:
23^(2n)*23^2 + 31^(2n)*31^2+46

now trying writing this in orginal form:

23^(2n)*528 + 23^(2n) + 31^(2n)*31^2+46

do same for 31 ..
 
  • #4
since you already got the answer.. here's what I did:

23^(2n)*528 + 23^(2n) + 31^(2n)*960 + 31 ^(2n) +46

= {23^(2n) + 31 ^(2n) +46} + {23^(2n)*528 + 31^(2n)*960}

everything divisible by 48
 
  • #5
rootX said:
Code:
[tex]23^{2N}+31^{2N}+46=48A[/tex]

correct



what's this doing there? if this is a part of the first equation ...


at n+1:
23^(2n)*23^2 + 31^(2n)*31^2+46

now trying writing this in orginal form:

23^(2n)*528 + 23^(2n) + 31^(2n)*31^2+46

do same for 31 ..

Well I multiplied what I assumed to be true by [itex]23^2+31^2[/itex] so could get [itex]23^{2N+2}+31^{2N+2}[/itex]

rootX said:
since you already got the answer.. here's what I did:

23^(2n)*528 + 23^(2n) + 31^(2n)*960 + 31 ^(2n) +46

= {23^(2n) + 31 ^(2n) +46} + {23^(2n)*528 + 31^(2n)*960}

everything divisible by 48


wouldn't I need to show that everything is divisible by 48 for it to be true,hence why I can't show 68540 is divisible by 48.


Dick said:
Everything is not supposed to be divisible by 48. You can drop the things that are, of course. Now you just want to show 68540+31^(2N)+23^(2N) gives a remainder of 46 when divided by 48. BTW, it's easier without induction. Just observe 23^2 and 31^2 are both equal to 1 mod 48.

I don't get how I am supposed to show it gives a remaineder of 48, when in the inductive hypothesis, I assumed that everything was together was divisible by 48.

Also,I don't understand what 1 mod 48 means. If it has to do with modular arithmetic,then I definitely don't know what you are talking about since I never learned that.
 
  • #6
since you already got the answer.. here's what I did:

23^(2n)*528 + 23^(2n) + 31^(2n)*960 + 31 ^(2n) +46

= {23^(2n) + 31 ^(2n) +46} + {23^(2n)*528 + 31^(2n)*960}

everything divisible by 48


wouldn't I need to show that everything is divisible by 48 for it to be true



Over there, from induction you assumed that {23^(2n) + 31 ^(2n) +46} is divisible by 48

at n+1 .. you get {23^(2n) + 31 ^(2n) +46} + {23^(2n)*528 + 31^(2n)*960}

divide this by 48..
{23^(2n) + 31 ^(2n) +46} is divisible
23^(2n)*528 is divisible
31^(2n)*960 is divisible...

so everything is proved
 
  • #7
So I am supposed to just substitute n=N+1 instead of building the (N+1)th term?
 
  • #8
rock.freak667 said:
So I am supposed to just substitute n=N+1 instead of building the (N+1)th term?

yep, isn't this is what you do for induction?

first assume it is true for n
and then substitute n by n+1 .. and prove it is true
 
  • #9
You really already have it, you just don't seem to see it. According to your inductive hypothesis, if you divide 23^(2N)+31^(2N) by 48, what is the remainder? Now look at the N+1 case. Assuming the hypothesis what's the remainder of 23^(2N+2)+31^(2N+2) divided by 48?
 
  • #10
rock.freak667 said:
I don't get how I am supposed to show it gives a remaineder of 48, when in the inductive hypothesis, I assumed that everything was together was divisible by 48.
He didn't say "remainder of 48", he said remainder of 46- so that added to the other remainders, they add up to 48.

Also,I don't understand what 1 mod 48 means. If it has to do with modular arithmetic,then I definitely don't know what you are talking about since I never learned that.

232= 529= 11(48)+ 1, 312= 961= 20(48)+ 1
So each has a remainder of one when divided by 48.

Also (x+ 1)n= a string of things times powers of x + 1 and so has a remainder of 1 when divided by x. Both 232n and 312n have a remainder of 1 when divided by 48 for any n.
 

1. Why doesn't induction seem to work in some cases?

Induction is based on the idea of observing patterns and making generalizations from those observations. However, not all patterns are representative of the whole and can lead to incorrect assumptions. Additionally, induction relies on the assumption of a uniform world, which may not always be the case.

2. Can induction ever be considered reliable?

Induction can be a useful tool in making predictions and generalizations in certain situations. However, it is not foolproof and should always be accompanied by other methods of inquiry and critical thinking.

3. How can we ensure the validity of inductive reasoning?

To increase the validity of inductive reasoning, it is important to gather a large and diverse sample size, carefully observe and record data, and critically analyze potential biases or confounding variables that may affect the results.

4. Are there any alternatives to using induction?

Yes, there are other methods of reasoning such as deduction, abduction, and analogical reasoning that can also be used to make predictions and generalizations. Each method has its own strengths and weaknesses, and a combination of approaches is often the most effective.

5. Can induction be used to prove a hypothesis?

No, induction can only provide evidence or support for a hypothesis. It cannot definitively prove or disprove a hypothesis, as there is always a possibility of new evidence or observations that may contradict the initial generalization.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
972
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
993
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
784
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
3K
Back
Top