Can Division by 1 Really Be Considered Division?

  • Thread starter MrXow
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Impossible
In summary: It is possible to divide by 1, both mathematically and physically, but it is essentially a "do nothing" operation. This is similar to adding 0 or multiplying by 1. The concept of dividing by 1 can also be seen in group theory, where it is equivalent to the "identity element" or "do nothing" operation. However, this does not mean that dividing by 1 is a trivial observation, as it highlights the existence of mathematical operations that have no impact on the final result. Additionally, this concept helps to explain why dividing by 0 is impossible, as it would result in an infinite number of slices and the disappearance of the whole.
  • #1
MrXow
60
0
Oddly enough I came across this on Uncyclopedia.
Can you really divide by 1?
I know that it can be mathematically done with ease, but physically can it be done?
Imagine a pie, and your dividing tool is your knife. If you want to divide the pie in 2 you can do that just cut the pie down the middle. If you want to divide it by 4 just cut it down the middle then do it again perpendicular to the original cut. But if you want to divide by 1 you end up not using your knife at all. You therefore don't divide the pie and do not divide by 1.

I hope this is the right forum.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
By your same logic, you can only divide by integers.
 
  • #3
MrXow said:
But if you want to divide by 1 you end up not using your knife at all. You therefore don't divide the pie and do not divide by 1.
I think this is merely a matter of language. Natural language has evolved to include an artificial distinction between "0" and "more than 0". (or more generally, between "less than 0", "0", "1", and "more than 1") While this is efficient for everyday communication, it has the unfortunate side-effect of constraining our thought -- we have a habit of excluding special cases when we really ought not to do so.


And another thing -- don't make a fallacy of equivocation. There are at least two distinct meanings for the word "divide" in your post: the English verb meaning a particular arithmetic calculation, and the English verb meaning to separate into parts. That they use the same word does not mean they are the same thing.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
MrXow said:
Oddly enough I came across this on Uncyclopedia.
Can you really divide by 1?
I know that it can be mathematically done with ease, but physically can it be done?
Imagine a pie, and your dividing tool is your knife. If you want to divide the pie in 2 you can do that just cut the pie down the middle. If you want to divide it by 4 just cut it down the middle then do it again perpendicular to the original cut. But if you want to divide by 1 you end up not using your knife at all. You therefore don't divide the pie and do not divide by 1.

I hope this is the right forum.

what do you get, when you want to divide a pie by 1? The entire pie itself.

what do you get when you want to divide a number by 1? The number itself.
 
  • #5
nesna said:
what do you get, when you want to divide a pie by 1? The entire pie itself.

what do you get when you want to divide a number by 1? The number itself.

Yes so you don't actually divide the pie or the number. If you want to say oh I wonder what 7/1 is. You already have the answer before you divide. And your not even dividing it up.
 
  • #6
MrXow said:
Yes so you don't actually divide the pie or the number. If you want to say oh I wonder what 7/1 is. You already have the answer before you divide. And your not even dividing it up.

You're confusing yourself. Of course dividing by 1 is possible. If it was impossible, you'd have no answer.
 
  • #7
I mean its impossible because you don't actually do any dividing. The answer is already there and you do not divide it.
 
  • #8
It's like a limit, sin(x)/x never gets to 0, but you know that it would be 1. You don't actually divide by 1 you just know that like 7/1.00000001 is roughly 7.

maybe that's a bad example.
 
  • #9
MrXow said:
I mean its impossible because you don't actually do any dividing. The answer is already there and you do not divide it.

So you're saying it's a tautology? That still doesn't make dividing by 1 impossible.
 
  • #10
It's not a totally trivial observation. It's interesting that there exist certain mathematical operations which are equivalent to doing nothing at all. Maybe the OP is going to grow up to be a group theorist!
 
  • #11
For those of you still debating this you need to read this again:

Hurkyl said:
And another thing -- don't make a fallacy of equivocation. There are at least two distinct meanings for the word "divide" in your post: the English verb meaning a particular arithmetic calculation, and the English verb meaning to separate into parts. That they use the same word does not mean they are the same thing.
 
  • #12
Dividing by one is basicly the 'do nothing' operation from group theory. It is the same as the 'add zero' operation under addition. The denominator tells how many pieces are left of the whole after you use the knife on the pie. So division by 2 is 'make one slice across the pie and leave 2 pieces', division by three is 'make 2 slices with the knife and leave three pieces,' etc. It is easy to see that on this incremental basis division by 1 is 'make no slices with the knife and leave one whole piece.' This would also go towards explaining why division by 0 is impossible as it is -1 slices with the knife and the command would be 'take away a slice that does not exist made by the knife and make the entire pie disappear (0 pieces).'
 
  • #13
Ya the pie metaphor doesn't explain negative pie.
 
  • #14
Please not think your kindergarten maths has anything to do with the concept of division.
 
  • #15
christianjb said:
It's not a totally trivial observation. It's interesting that there exist certain mathematical operations which are equivalent to doing nothing at all. Maybe the OP is going to grow up to be a group theorist!

What's the OP?
 
  • #16
MrXow said:
What's the OP?

Original poster
 
  • #17
Is this topic over yet? If it is then I need someone to explain why I cannot add 0 to my pie... :biggrin:
 
  • #18
Now all we need to do is learn how to physically divide the pie by a half, and never go hungry again :)
 
  • #19
MrXow said:
What's the OP?

That's you. :)
 
  • #20
MrXow said:
It's like a limit, sin(x)/x never gets to 0, but you know that it would be 1. You don't actually divide by 1 you just know that like 7/1.00000001 is roughly 7.

maybe that's a bad example.

There are much better examples, especially since if x=pi then sin(x)/x is, in fact, equal to zero.
 
  • #21
MrXow said:
Oddly enough I came across this on Uncyclopedia.
Can you really divide by 1?
I know that it can be mathematically done with ease, but physically can it be done?
Imagine a pie, and your dividing tool is your knife. If you want to divide the pie in 2 you can do that just cut the pie down the middle. If you want to divide it by 4 just cut it down the middle then do it again perpendicular to the original cut. But if you want to divide by 1 you end up not using your knife at all. You therefore don't divide the pie and do not divide by 1.

I hope this is the right forum.

Division is a mathematical operation between numbers or functions of numbers.
Separating objects into parts is not division.

That we can simulate the operation of division applied to pies etc, has restrictive meaning.

What would (pie)/pi mean? I don't think there is a knife sharp enough to cut irrational numbers of parts, do you?

Applied mathematics tries to interpret mathematical operations into physical happenings, often without meaning, as you have described.
 
Last edited:
  • #22
Hurkyl said:
And another thing -- don't make a fallacy of equivocation. There are at least two distinct meanings for the word "divide" in your post: the English verb meaning a particular arithmetic calculation, and the English verb meaning to separate into parts. That they use the same word does not mean they are the same thing.

That explains it perfectly. If it is still not clear...read it again and again and again...:biggrin:
 

1. Why is dividing by 1 considered impossible?

Dividing by 1 is considered impossible because dividing by a number means finding how many times that number can fit into another number. Since 1 is the smallest whole number, it can fit into any number an infinite number of times, making the concept of division meaningless.

2. Can't we just say that dividing by 1 results in the same number?

While it may be mathematically correct to say that dividing by 1 results in the same number, it is not a useful or meaningful operation. This is because dividing by 1 serves no purpose in solving equations or finding proportions, as it does not change the value of the number being divided.

3. Is there a scenario where dividing by 1 is necessary?

No, there is no scenario where dividing by 1 is necessary. In fact, many mathematical equations and concepts, such as the commutative and associative properties, would not work if dividing by 1 was allowed.

4. Can we divide by numbers smaller than 1?

Yes, we can divide by numbers smaller than 1, such as fractions or decimals. This is because these numbers represent a part of a whole, whereas 1 represents a whole unit. Dividing by these numbers can result in a smaller value, which is still a meaningful operation.

5. How does the concept of dividing by 1 relate to infinity?

Dividing by 1 is often used in discussions about infinity because it helps illustrate the concept of infinity as a never-ending, boundless number. Since dividing by 1 results in an infinite number of times, it helps us understand the concept of infinity as something that has no limit or end point.

Similar threads

  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
18
Views
407
  • General Math
Replies
2
Views
923
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
887
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
43
Views
4K
Replies
42
Views
4K
Back
Top