How can I determine the moment of inertia of an irregular object?

In summary, Thomas wants to build a motor from the ground up and needs to determine the torque required to move the armature. He came up with a way to measure the torque by tying a string to the armature and measuring the work done.
  • #1
Xyius
508
4
Hello everyone, (This might be a little long winded but I would very much appreciate some help on this!)

Today while in psychology class, I was thinking about a much more important subject, namely a project I want to start working on. Basically what I want to do is build a motor from the ground up. Like a real motor that would be in a machine. I want to start from complete theory and them move to actually building it once. (I am a senior undergraduate in Physics and I want to get into theoretical physics in my future.)

So my first thought would be, how would I determine how much current I need to run through each of the windings to get the motor to move? I then realized that I would need to know the torque required to move the armature, and this would be the LEAST amount of torque I would need. (I would obviously want more torque than this so the motor can actually drive things. And I would actually need a little more than this to get it moving due to friction effects.) Here is something I came up with to measure this torque.

Have an external force spin the armature to a constant frequency ω. When it reaches this point, cut the power to the armature (The force would be coming from some external motor) and see how long it takes it to stop spinning. The torque will be approximately equal to..

[tex]T≈\frac{ΔL}{Δt}=\frac{I(ω_2-ω_1)}{Δt}[/tex]

So I would need to determine the rotational inertia of the armature first. It is spinning about one of its principle axis so it will not be a tensor. To determine the rotational inertia, the idea I came up with would be very similar to determining the torque. I would again drive the armature to spin at a constant frequency ω and then cut the power. But right when I cut the power, have a "negligible" string tied to one end of the armature. This string is attached to a block of known weight and will consequently do work on the block by moving it linearly. From the work-kinetic energy theorem we can find the kinetic energy.
[tex]W=ΔK[/tex]

So here is the part I need help on. So for a rotating body the kinetic energy is..

[tex]K=\frac{1}{2}Iω^2[/tex]
But ω would not be constant since the object is negatively accelerating (slowing down). So I would have..
[tex]dK=\frac{1}{2}I(dω)^2[/tex]
Or..
[tex]∫dK=K=∫\frac{1}{2}I(dω)^2=\frac{1}{2}I∫(dω)^2[/tex]

I have taken so many advanced physics and mathematics courses, I find it funny that I do not know how to integrate this. I have never worked with a squared differential before. How would I go about doing this?

Also, if anyone has any other ways about measuring the moment of inertia of something, or any comments about my way, feel free to let me know!

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Xyius said:
[tex]dK=\frac{1}{2}I(dω)^2[/tex]
That does not work.
[tex]dK=\frac{1}{2}Id(\omega^2) = I\omega d\omega[/tex]
This can be integrated, but where is the point in taking the derivative if you integrate afterwards?
 
  • #3
mfb said:
That does not work.
[tex]dK=\frac{1}{2}Id(\omega^2) = I\omega d\omega[/tex]
This can be integrated, but where is the point in taking the derivative if you integrate afterwards?

Thank you for your reply.

So that would mean that I can simply take the final and initial ω values. I will already have K from the work done by the block, and the values of ω, so the only unknown in the equation would be the moment of inertia.

Thanks! Hope this is a correct analysis. :]
 

1. How does your thought experiment work?

The thought experiment involves suspending the irregular object from a pivot point and measuring the time it takes to complete one oscillation. By analyzing the period of oscillation and other variables like the distance from the pivot point and the mass of the object, the moment of inertia can be calculated using the equation I = mr^2.

2. What makes this thought experiment useful?

This thought experiment allows for the determination of the moment of inertia of an irregular object without having to physically measure the object's shape and dimensions. This can save time and resources, especially for objects with complex shapes.

3. Is this thought experiment accurate?

Like any experiment, there may be some margin of error in the results obtained from this thought experiment. However, with proper measurements and calculations, the moment of inertia can be determined with a high degree of accuracy.

4. Can this thought experiment be applied to any irregular object?

Yes, this thought experiment can be applied to any irregular object as long as it can be suspended and allowed to oscillate freely from a pivot point. The equation used to calculate the moment of inertia is a general one and is applicable to all objects.

5. Are there any limitations to this thought experiment?

One limitation of this thought experiment is that it assumes the object is rigid and has a constant mass distribution. If the object is deformable or has varying mass distribution, the results may not be as accurate. Additionally, the accuracy of the results also depends on the precision of the measurements and calculations made.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
278
  • Mechanics
2
Replies
67
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Mechanics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
693
  • Mechanics
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top