One question related to an ideal of Ring R

  • Thread starter wowolala
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Ring
In summary, an ideal of a ring is a non-empty subset that is closed under multiplication by elements of the ring and contains the additive identity element. It is different from a subgroup in that the operations are different and a subgroup must contain the inverse of each element. An ideal can contain non-commutative elements and is always a subring. A field cannot have any non-trivial ideals due to the fact that every element has a multiplicative inverse.
  • #1
wowolala
24
0
Let a and b belong to a commutative ring R. Prove that { x ∈ R | ax∈bR } is an ideal.

i really need help

thx
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
just use the definition of an ideal, where are you stuck exactly
 
  • #3


One question that comes to mind when considering this ideal is: How does this ideal relate to the ideals generated by a and b individually in R? This is a valid question to ask because it helps to understand the structure and properties of the ideal in question.

To prove that { x ∈ R | ax∈bR } is an ideal, we can follow the definition of an ideal. First, we need to show that it is a subgroup of R under addition. Let x and y be elements in the set, then we have:

ax, ay ∈ bR
ax + ay ∈ bR (since bR is closed under addition)
a(x + y) ∈ bR (distributive property)
∴ x + y ∈ { x ∈ R | ax∈bR } (by definition)

Next, we need to show that it is closed under multiplication by elements in R. Let r be an element in R, then we have:

ax ∈ bR
rax ∈ rbR (since bR is closed under multiplication by elements in R)
∴ rx ∈ { x ∈ R | ax∈bR } (by definition)

Therefore, { x ∈ R | ax∈bR } is a subgroup of R under addition and closed under multiplication by elements in R. This fulfills the requirements for being an ideal in R.

Furthermore, we can see that this ideal is related to the ideals generated by a and b individually in R. In fact, it is the intersection of these two ideals: { x ∈ R | ax∈bR } = (a) ∩ (b). This means that it contains all elements that are in both (a) and (b). This can be seen by considering the fact that if ax ∈ bR, then it is also in (a) and (b). Similarly, if ax ∈ (a) and b ∈ (b), then ax ∈ bR.

In conclusion, the ideal { x ∈ R | ax∈bR } is a subgroup of R and is related to the ideals generated by a and b individually in R. This provides a deeper understanding of its properties and significance in the ring R.
 

What is an ideal of a ring?

An ideal of a ring is a subset of the ring that satisfies certain properties. Specifically, it is a non-empty subset that is closed under addition and multiplication by elements of the ring. In other words, if you take any element from the ideal and multiply it by any element from the ring, the result will also be in the ideal. Additionally, the ideal must contain the additive identity element of the ring.

How is an ideal different from a subgroup?

An ideal is a subset of a ring, while a subgroup is a subset of a group. While both are defined as non-empty subsets that are closed under certain operations, the operations are different. In a subgroup, the operation is usually addition or multiplication, while in an ideal, the operation is multiplication. Additionally, a subgroup must contain the inverse of each of its elements, while an ideal does not necessarily have this property.

Can an ideal contain non-commutative elements?

Yes, an ideal can contain non-commutative elements. This is because the definition of an ideal only requires closure under multiplication, not commutativity. Therefore, an ideal can contain elements that do not commute with each other.

Is an ideal always a subring?

Yes, an ideal is always a subring. This is because an ideal is a subset of a ring that is closed under multiplication, and a subring is defined as a subset of a ring that is closed under both addition and multiplication. Since an ideal is already closed under multiplication, it automatically satisfies the definition of a subring.

Can a field have any non-trivial ideals?

No, a field cannot have any non-trivial ideals. This is because in a field, every element has a multiplicative inverse, which means that the only subsets that are closed under multiplication are the trivial subsets (containing just the identity element) and the entire field itself. Therefore, there are no non-trivial ideals in a field.

Similar threads

  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
2
Replies
55
Views
4K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
797
  • General Math
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
229
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
822
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
272
Back
Top