Prove Uniform Spherical Shell Mass Gravitational Field Intensity

In summary, a uniform spherical shell mass is cut into two pieces parallel to one of Symmetry axis. Prove that the gravitational field intensity due to the mass at the center of the cross sectional plane parrallel to the symmetry axis is same for both the parts. This is fairly simple. You need to know the gravitational field of a disc (or ring) though. If you know spherical coordinates, then this is easier: you just write the field due to some dm=\rho dV where dV = r^{2}\sin\theta dr d\theta d\phi (for more info google it up).
  • #1
vaishakh
334
0
Please help me prove - A uniform spherical shell mass is cut into two pieces parallel to one of Symmetry axis. Prove that the gravitational field intensity due to the mass at the centre of the cross sectional plane parrallel to the symmetry axis is same for both the parts.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Thats fairly simple. What have you done?
 
  • #3
My idea is from the fact that field is 0 internally at that point. So there must be two opposite vectors due to these two parts which must be equal in magnitude. But proving them separately using integration is becoming a bit difficult.
 
  • #4
vaishakh said:
My idea is from the fact that field is 0 internally at that point. So there must be two opposite vectors due to these two parts which must be equal in magnitude. But proving them separately using integration is becoming a bit difficult.

Well I'm not sure if I understand you correctly. You said uniform spherical shell so that means a sphere with zero mass inside it. By symmetry and the shell theorem, the field at any point inside is zero. :smile: If you cut it along a diametrical plane, then the fields due to the two hemispherical shells thus formed must be zero at their (former) common center (by symmetry they must be along the axis passing through the center and perpendicular to the plane face).

If you are talking of a solid sphere with uniform mass distribution (or even a mass distribution that is radially symmetrical--mass function of radius only and not any angular coordinate) then the field is zero only at its center. At points in the interior it varies directly with radial distance and outside it falls off as inverse square of radial distance. Now, if you cut a sphere along a diametrical plane then again by symmetry of mass distribution the field due to BOTH is zero at their common center. Is this what you're saying?

For a hemisphere, the easiest way is to consider it to be made up of differential discs of varying radius and distance from the center located at the plane face of the hemisphere. (And for a hemispherical ring its even easier with the differential mass element being a ring). You need to know the gravitational field of a disc (or ring) though. If you know spherical coordinates, then this is easier: you just write the field due to some [itex]dm=\rho dV[/itex] where [itex]dV = r^{2}\sin\theta dr d\theta d\phi[/itex] (for more info google it up). Of course that brings in a lot of accounting to start with (3 integrals) but its neat and you're less likely to make mistakes with boundary terms.
 

What is a uniform spherical shell?

A uniform spherical shell is a hollow, spherical object with a consistent mass distribution throughout its surface. This means that the mass is evenly distributed, and there are no areas of greater or lesser mass within the shell.

What is the relationship between mass and gravitational field intensity in a uniform spherical shell?

In a uniform spherical shell, the gravitational field intensity is directly proportional to the mass of the shell. This means that as the mass of the shell increases, so does the gravitational field intensity.

How do you prove the mass and gravitational field intensity relationship in a uniform spherical shell?

The proof for the relationship between mass and gravitational field intensity in a uniform spherical shell is based on the concept of Gauss's law. This law states that the flux of the gravitational field through a closed surface is equal to the mass enclosed by that surface. By applying this law to a uniform spherical shell, we can show that the gravitational field intensity is directly proportional to the mass of the shell.

Can the relationship between mass and gravitational field intensity be applied to other objects besides a uniform spherical shell?

Yes, the relationship between mass and gravitational field intensity can be applied to any object with a spherically symmetric mass distribution. This means that as long as the mass is evenly distributed throughout the object, the gravitational field intensity will be directly proportional to the mass.

What are some real-world applications of understanding the mass and gravitational field intensity relationship in a uniform spherical shell?

Understanding this relationship can be useful in various fields such as astronomy and geophysics. For example, it can be used to calculate the gravitational pull of planets or stars with a spherical shape. It can also be applied in engineering to design structures that can withstand gravitational forces. Additionally, it can help in understanding the behavior of objects such as comets or asteroids that have a spherically symmetric mass distribution.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
16
Views
546
  • Classical Physics
Replies
16
Views
845
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
797
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top