Understanding Radar Guns and Speed Measurement with STR

  • Thread starter O Great One
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Gun Radar
In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of Doppler shift in relation to a police radar gun and the speed of light. It is explained that the formula for Doppler shift is a function only of relative velocity and that this concept is a result of special relativity. The conversation also includes analogies and examples to illustrate this concept.
  • #1
O Great One
98
0
Hello everyone,
I was just thinking about something...A police radar gun measures the speed of an object by the change in frequency of the reflected wave. For example...we might have a gun sending out a series of radio waves towards an object moving toward us like this...

GUN: )____)____)____)____)____)____)______<-object<-

in which case we would receive the following series of waves since each wave reaches the object more quickly:

GUN: (_(_(_(_(_(_(_______<-object<-

however, it seems that there should be no Doppler shift if the speed of light were constant. The waves should hit the object at the same rate, no matter what the speed of the object.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3
If I have a stream of cars passing me at a rate of 1 per second and their speed relative to me is to remain constant then they would have to continue passing me at a rate of 1 per second, no matter what my speed is. But, this doesn't happen in the case of the radar gun. The electromagnetic waves hit the object more or less frequently depending on the speed of the object.
 
  • #4
O Great One said:
If I have a stream of cars passing me at a rate of 1 per second and their speed relative to me is to remain constant then they would have to continue passing me at a rate of 1 per second, no matter what my speed is.
Well, that's true but not analogous to the radar gun scenario. A closer, albeit bizarre, analogy would be: A stream of cars pass you at the frequency of 1 per second, but then get reflected off of a moving wall which is approaching you. The frequency at which the reflected cars pass you by is greater than 1 per second, even though the speed at which the cars pass you is constant. (The distance between the cars is shorter in the reflected stream.)
 
  • #5
A stream of cars pass you at the frequency of 1 per second, but then get reflected off of a moving wall which is approaching you. The frequency at which the reflected cars pass you by is greater than 1 per second, even though the speed at which the cars pass you is constant. (The distance between the cars is shorter in the reflected stream.)
In your analogy, we're talking about the moving wall, which is the object, not about me, which would be the radar gun. So, yes, the cars would be reflected to me (the gun) at the same rate, but they would be faster relative to the moving wall (the object).
 
  • #6
O Great One said:
In your analogy, we're talking about the moving wall, which is the object, not about me, which would be the radar gun. So, yes, the cars would be reflected to me (the gun) at the same rate, but they would be faster relative to the moving wall (the object).
Not true. The speed of the (relativistic) cars with respect to the gun would be "c" according to the observer holding the gun, and it would also be "c" with respect to the wall according to observers moving with the wall.
 
  • #7
Somebody is throwing balls at me at a constant speed and frequency while I'm standing still. I'm holding a reflective shield which reflects the balls back towards the thrower at the same speed they were coming towards me. I start walking towards the thrower. I can state two things with certainty.

1. The speed of the balls relative to me will be faster once I start walking towards the thrower.

2. The thrower will receive the balls with greater frequency than when he threw them.

So, why doesn't the same logic apply to light?
 
  • #8
O Great One said:
1. The speed of the balls relative to me will be faster once I start walking towards the thrower.
This is certainly true for things (balls) moving at speeds less that the speed of light. But it doesn't apply to light. No matter how fast you move towards the light, its speed with respect to you remains constant. This is not common sense! But it is true and its consequences led to the development of special relativity.
2. The thrower will receive the balls with greater frequency than when he threw them.
This is true. The frequency will change for both balls and light. (But the speed of light will remain constant.)

So, why doesn't the same logic apply to light?
The common sense "logic" that tells you if the balls and you both move at speed "v" (with respect to the ground) then the speed of the balls with respect to you must be "v + v" is really a physical assumption of how the world works called galilean relativity. It's just not true, but is a good approximation for low speeds. For objects moving at high speeds (like light itself) that assumption is no good at all and must be replaced by special relativity.
 
  • #9
Consider two objects, both emitting flashes at one per second.

The first object is stationary, the second object is moving towards you.

The stationary object will emit a flash, there will be a constant time delay of distance/c, and the flash will arive. Thus the interval that you'll see flashes is once per second.

THe moving object will emit a flash, and there will be a variable time delay of distance = (initial distance - velocity*time)/c. Because of the variable time delay, pulses will not arrive at once per second.
 

1. How do radar guns measure speed?

Radar guns use the Doppler effect to measure the speed of an object. The gun emits radio waves, which bounce off the moving object and return to the gun. The frequency of the returned waves is compared to the frequency of the emitted waves, and the difference is used to calculate the speed of the object.

2. What is the difference between radar and lidar?

Radar uses radio waves, while lidar uses laser beams to measure speed. Radar can measure speed at longer distances and in all weather conditions, while lidar is more accurate and can provide more detailed information about the object being measured.

3. Can radar guns be affected by outside factors?

Yes, radar guns can be affected by outside factors such as weather conditions, obstructions, and interfering signals. It's important for the operator to be aware of these factors and make adjustments to ensure accurate readings.

4. How does the STR technology improve speed measurement accuracy?

The STR (Stationary Testing and Ranging) technology uses multiple radar beams to track the speed of a moving object. This allows for more accurate and consistent readings, even in situations where there may be obstructions or interference.

5. Are there any limitations to radar guns in speed measurement?

Yes, radar guns have limitations in speed measurement, such as the angle of measurement and the accuracy of the operator. They also cannot differentiate between multiple objects in close proximity, which can lead to inaccurate readings.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
5
Replies
146
Views
6K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
172
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
45
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
4K
Back
Top