Byron Nuclear Gen Station Backup Cooling Pumps

In summary, the Byron Nuclear Generating Station in Illinois experienced a power shutdown at Unit 2 due to a loss of offsite power. Backup diesel generators were used to supply power and steam was vented on the non-nuclear side to cool the reactor. The vented steam contained low levels of radioactive tritium, but posed no threat to workers or the public. The shutdown was a precautionary measure and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission will investigate the cause of the power loss.
  • #1
swl
111
0
Do any of you know if the backup water pumps have been upgraded at the Byron NGS?

Also, is the plant currently using the main cooling pumps, or the backup pumps?

Last year after the Fukushima triple meltdown, the NRC told the Exelon that the backup cooling pumps at Byron were too small to cool the reactor in an emergency, and after waffling back and forth on the issue, the operator, Exelon, decided the pumps were indeed too small.

So, are the undersized pumps the reason for their decision to release radioactive steam into the atmosphere? Or is this the normal operating procedure in response to loss of offsite power?

Thanks for any expert guidance.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
AP said:
BYRON, Ill. (AP) — A nuclear reactor at a northern Illinois plant shut down Monday after losing power, and steam was being vented to reduce pressure, according to officials from Exelon Nuclear and federal regulators.

Unit 2 at Byron Generating Station shut down around 10:18 a.m., after losing power from an off-site source, Exelon officials said. Diesel generators began supplying power to the plant equipment and operators began releasing steam from the non-nuclear side of the plant to help cool the reactor, officials said.

Even though the turbine is not turning to produce electricity, "you still need to cool the equipment." said U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission spokeswoman Viktoria Mitlyng. Releasing steam helps "take away some of that energy still being produced by nuclear reaction but that doesn't have anywhere to go now."

The steam contains low levels of radioactive tritium, but the levels are safe for workers and the public, federal and plant officials said.
Source: http://www.newstrib.com/articles/news/nci/default.asp?article=32125

The venting comes from the secondary side, and the apparently the plant is designed to do just that. The coolant in the secondary loop may contain some tritium from the primary coolant side, either from leaks or from the fact that hydrogen diffuses in metals from hotter to cooler.

Venting steam is a quick way to remove heat from the primary system. It appears unit 2 was running at full power, as was Unit 1, when it tripped. The current cycle of Unit 2 began Oct 10, 2011.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
I am pleased to read that there is no danger to the public or plant operators.

Any ideas why http://www.nwherald.com/2012/01/30/power-loss-shuts-down-byron-nuclear-plant-unit-public-in-no-danger/asepmmg/ if there was no danger?

Could the radiation have been more intense near the plant, or could it have been to prevent hearing damage from the sound of the steam release?
 
  • #4
"Any ideas why "Workers were evacuated" if there was no danger?""

my GUESS is it's innocuous, like a fire alarm went off or the office building went dark when offsite power through that transformer was lost..

were there a release there'd have been notification to public agencies.
 
  • #5
swl said:
I am pleased to read that there is no danger to the public or plant operators.

Any ideas why http://www.nwherald.com/2012/01/30/power-loss-shuts-down-byron-nuclear-plant-unit-public-in-no-danger/asepmmg/ if there was no danger?

Could the radiation have been more intense near the plant, or could it have been to prevent hearing damage from the sound of the steam release?
From the cited source, "Workers were evacuated and Byron and several other area fire departments were on stand by at the scene as precautionary measures, . . . "

I imagine that workers in affected areas were removed as a precaution while the plant was being shutdown.

Meanwhile the NRC will investigate why the plant lost offsite power, and I expect they will review the response of the plant staff in managing the shutdown.
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/news/2012/12-005.iii.pdf
 

1. What are the backup cooling pumps at Byron Nuclear Generation Station?

The backup cooling pumps at Byron Nuclear Generation Station are emergency systems designed to provide cooling water to the nuclear reactor in case of a loss of normal cooling systems. These pumps are typically diesel-powered and can operate independently from the main power grid.

2. How many backup cooling pumps are there at Byron Nuclear Generation Station?

There are typically multiple backup cooling pumps at Byron Nuclear Generation Station. The exact number may vary depending on the specific plant design and safety regulations, but there are typically at least 2 or 3 backup cooling pumps.

3. How do the backup cooling pumps at Byron Nuclear Generation Station work?

The backup cooling pumps at Byron Nuclear Generation Station work by pumping water from an external source, such as a nearby river or lake, through the reactor's heat exchangers to remove excess heat. The heated water is then discharged back into the external source.

4. What happens if the backup cooling pumps fail at Byron Nuclear Generation Station?

If the backup cooling pumps fail at Byron Nuclear Generation Station, there are additional safety systems in place to prevent the reactor from overheating. These may include emergency power supplies, backup generators, and other cooling systems such as passive heat removal systems.

5. Are the backup cooling pumps at Byron Nuclear Generation Station regularly tested?

Yes, the backup cooling pumps at Byron Nuclear Generation Station are regularly tested and maintained to ensure they are in proper working order. These tests are performed according to strict safety regulations and procedures to ensure the safety and reliability of the plant.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
52
Views
7K
Replies
14
Views
8K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
27
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
8K
Back
Top