Manifest Lorentz covariance

In summary: However, this extra work is not always necessary, and is only required when the symmetry group is not trivial.
  • #1
voltan
6
0
My question is: what does "manifest" Lorentz covariance means for a field theory, as opposed to simply Lorentz invariance.

Thanks for the replies!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I guess manifest stands for "explicit", meaning the use of space-time fields which come from the finite dimensional representations of the Lorentz group (and generally SL(2,C)).
The classical theory of the electromagnetic field in vacuum is manifestly Lorentz covariant, if the Lagrangian density is written using space-time tensors and covectors, i.e. [itex] \mathcal{L}= -\frac{1}{4} F^{\mu\nu}F_{\mu\nu} [/itex].
 
  • #3
Another way to think about it is that a manifestly lorentz covariant theory is one formed out of only lorentz scalars (all lorentz indices are contracted), and in which time and space are treated on equal footing.
 
  • #4
voltan said:
My question is: what does "manifest" Lorentz covariance means for a field theory, as opposed to simply Lorentz invariance.

Thanks for the replies!

An expression with FREE space-time indices is called covariant, all tensorial equations are covariant, for example the equation
[tex]\partial_{a}F^{abc} = J^{bc} + \epsilon^{bcade}F_{ade}[/tex]
is Lorentz covariant because it is equivalent to the tensor equation [itex]R^{bc}=0[/itex].
If there are NO indices or NO FREE indices (i.e. all indices are summed over) then we say that the expression is scalar or Lorentz invariant, examples
[tex]T = \eta_{ab}T^{ab} + F^{ab}F_{ab} + \eta_{ab}\eta_{cd}T^{ac}F^{bd}[/tex]

Sam
 
  • #5
Maxwell's equations in 3-vector form are Lorentz invariant in that they are the same in any Lorentz system, but they are not 'manifestly' Lorentz invariant.
'Manifestly' Lorentz invariance means that the LI is obvious from the form of the equations.
 
  • #6
Meir Achuz said:
Maxwell's equations in 3-vector form are Lorentz invariant in that they are the same in any Lorentz system, but they are not 'manifestly' Lorentz invariant.
'Manifestly' Lorentz invariance means that the LI is obvious from the form of the equations.

And that is what is meant by manifest,right?
 
  • #7
manifest as an adjective is defined as: clear or obvious to the eye or mind.
manifestly is the adverb form of the word.

-- what Meir Achuz posted.
 
  • #8
Thank you very much for all the replies!

It is still not clear to me if there could be Lorentz-covariance without it being "manifest" (or "explicit")?

Any opinion would be appreciated!
 
  • #9
We generally use the term <covariance> in relation to tensor fields on a flat/curved 4D spacetime, so the 'manifest' attribute is automatic.
 
  • #10
Of course there can be Lorentz covariance w/o manifest Lorentz covariance.

As explained above manifest 'covariance' of an expression is present when it is formulated in terms of 4-tensors but w/o all indices being contracted, whereas 'invariance' means that all indices are contracted, i.e. the experession contains only Lorentz-scalars.

So the Maxwell equations formulated in terms of 4-tensors are manifest covariant. But when you split them in E- and B-fields etc. they are still covariant (why should they lose this property by rewriting them in a fully equivalent way?) but they are no longer manifest covariant (you don't see immediately that they are covariant, you have to check it explicitly).
 
  • #11
From a gauge-theory point of view you can make the following observation:

Take for example a photon, which has two polarizations. Naively, you would like to use some field with two degrees of freedom to describe such a photon. However, such a description is not "manifestly Lorentz covariant", because there is no representation in which fits your two degrees of freedom. The smallest representation is the vector representation, having four dof's. Gauge invariance however now cuts these four dof's down to two, which is exactly what you need.

In that sense, you could say that gauge invariance helps you to describe photons in a "manifest Lorentz-covariant way".

The subtle point is that field equations can more or less always be rewritten in "manifestly X-covariant way", where X is some symmetry group, by using the so-called Stückelberg trick. This amounts to introducing extra fields to realize the symmetry.
 

What is Manifest Lorentz covariance?

Manifest Lorentz covariance is a fundamental principle in physics that states that the laws of physics should remain the same in all inertial reference frames. This means that the mathematical form of physical laws should not change when observed from different perspectives, as long as the relative motion between the reference frames is uniform.

Why is Manifest Lorentz covariance important?

Manifest Lorentz covariance is important because it is a fundamental principle of relativity and is necessary for our understanding of the universe. It allows us to make accurate predictions and calculations in physics, and has been confirmed by numerous experiments and observations.

How does Manifest Lorentz covariance relate to Einstein's theory of relativity?

Manifest Lorentz covariance is a key component of Einstein's theory of relativity. It is the mathematical expression of the principle of relativity, which states that the laws of physics should be the same for all observers in uniform motion.

What are some examples of physical laws that exhibit Manifest Lorentz covariance?

Some examples of physical laws that exhibit Manifest Lorentz covariance include the equations of motion in classical mechanics, Maxwell's equations of electromagnetism, and the Schrödinger equation in quantum mechanics.

Are there any exceptions to Manifest Lorentz covariance?

Manifest Lorentz covariance has been verified in all experiments and observations to date, and there are no known exceptions. However, it is possible that it may not hold in extreme conditions, such as in the presence of a singularity or in the early universe. This is an area of ongoing research in physics.

Similar threads

  • Classical Physics
Replies
4
Views
171
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
793
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
0
Views
599
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
11
Views
902
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
917
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
0
Views
922
Back
Top