Register to reply 
Lagrangian density for fields 
Share this thread: 
#1
Oct2413, 11:34 PM

P: 53

This is probably a minor point, but I have seen in some QFT texts the EulerLagrange equation for a scalar field,
[tex] \partial_{\mu} \left(\frac{\delta \cal{L}}{\delta (\partial_{\mu}\phi)}\right)  \frac{\delta \cal L}{\delta \phi }=0 [/tex] i.e. [itex] \cal L [/itex] is treated like a functional (seen from the [itex] \delta [/itex] symbol). But why would it be a functional? Functonals map functions into numbers, and in our case [itex] \cal L [/itex] is a function of the fields (and their derivatives). 


#2
Oct2513, 12:01 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 2,602

If you want to be completely rigorous, the action is the true functional. The variational derivatives of the Lagrangian (density) should be considered distributions.



#3
Oct2513, 08:46 AM

P: 53

But why should there be a functional derivative of [itex] \cal L [/itex]? we have [itex] \cal L [/itex] which is a function of [itex] (\phi, \partial_\mu \phi) [/itex] and we differentiate (as a function) with respect to [itex] \partial_\mu \phi [/itex]



#4
Oct2513, 09:18 AM

Sci Advisor
Thanks
P: 4,160

Lagrangian density for fields



#5
Oct2513, 10:46 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 2,602




Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Why is the lagrangian polynomial in fields and derivatives  Quantum Physics  2  
Lagrangian for E and B fields, not vector potential?  Classical Physics  1  
Lagrangian density  Advanced Physics Homework  2  
Lagrangian for fields AND particles?  Classical Physics  1  
Lagrangian density of the EM field  Classical Physics  16 