Do particles exist forever? Can Anything Exist forever?

  • Thread starter darkar
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Particles
In summary, according to the conversation, particles do eventually decay. Some particles, like neutrons, decay quickly while others, like protons, decay more slowly. Proton decay is still unknown, but it is possible and has a half life greater than 1033 years.
  • #1
darkar
187
0
Can any particles last forever? Is that all particles will eventually decays? And is that after decay, in another process they will form back again?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If you had a neutron, well, it most probably end up decaying into other particles, and that would mean that it didn't last forever. Of course conservation laws are still in place.
 
  • #3
neutrons have a half life of approximately fifteen minutes and then they decay into a proton. protons and electrons seem to be the most stable particles and their half life is in texts as being infinite but of course they could just have an extremely long half life of greater than the present age of the universe.
 
  • #4
Grand unified theories seem to require proton decay. However, all experiments to date have come up with a half life something > 1033 years, i.e. no decays observed.
 
  • #5
mathman said:
Grand unified theories seem to require proton decay. However, all experiments to date have come up with a half life something > 1033 years, i.e. no decays observed.

Does this mean that currently no evidence that GUT is correct?
 
  • #6
We don't have any grand unified theories yet, ones presented have been full of errors, anomolies, etc, but there are some still in production.
 
  • #7
photons do not decay as they experience no time
 
  • #8
Flatland said:
photons do not decay as they experience no time


Time?
"Decay" pre-supposes that there are fundamental particles associated with the original.
Hence, photons do not decay because there is nothing to "decay".
In addition, a photon, though it can exhibit particle-like behavior, is not a particle. It is a force carrier.
My perception(though I could be wrong) is that force-carriers cannot decay, having nothing to do with "time"
 
  • #9
Can I chip into say there is something of a conceptual problem with "particles". We tend to think of them as little billiard balls, but it might be better to think of them as regions of spacetime with certain properties. As I'm sure Flatland will concur, there's also a conceptual problem with Forces being thought of as messenger particles rather than distortions of spacetime in one or more dimensions. It gets worse when you look at time, because in a way the time is in the "particle" rather than the particle being in the time. All these issues fog the original question, and maybe it should be rephrased to How and why does a region of spacetime make a quantum-leap state change to break into one or more regions of spacetime with different properties? But I don't know the answer to that. Sorry.
 
  • #10
darkar said:
Can any particles last forever? Is that all particles will eventually decays? And is that after decay, in another process they will form back again?

I would think that ultimately everything material decays (perhaps even protons and electrons and neutrino's) and in theory could lead to a universe which only contains radiation (Penrose has speculated about this idea, and suggested that in that instance the universe forgets about time and the universe will re-inflate and forms a new big bang, see http://www.Newton.ac.uk/webseminars/pg+ws/2005/gmr/gmrw04/1107/penrose/) but then the universe in one or other form will always exist.
If we assume that matter+energy is conserved always, there will always be a universe, and we do not currently doubt this.
 
  • #11
pallidin said:
Time?
"Decay" pre-supposes that there are fundamental particles associated with the original.
Hence, photons do not decay because there is nothing to "decay".
In addition, a photon, though it can exhibit particle-like behavior, is not a particle. It is a force carrier.
My perception(though I could be wrong) is that force-carriers cannot decay, having nothing to do with "time"

I would argue that this is because of having no rest mass.
 
  • #12
Why do neutrons decay so readily when not confined in an atomic nucleus?
Does strong nuclear force help prevent their rapid decay?
 
  • #13
You can naively think of this as the neutron inside a nucleus has lower mass then a free neutron due to the binding energy, which precents the proton to become an accessible decay state for the neutron.

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_decay )
 
  • #14
What would the proton decay to?
 
  • #15
neu said:
What would the proton decay to?
Although some theories predict proton decay, there has been no evidence of it. If it does the half life is > 1033 years.
 

1. Do particles exist forever?

The answer to this question is complex and depends on the type of particle in question. In classical physics, particles are considered to be eternal and indestructible. However, in quantum physics, it is believed that particles can decay and transform into other particles. Additionally, some particles, like protons, are thought to be stable and may exist forever.

2. Can anything exist forever?

Similar to the previous question, the answer to this one also depends on the context. In terms of the universe, it is currently unknown if it will exist forever. Some theories suggest that the universe will eventually experience heat death or a Big Crunch, while others propose the possibility of an eternal universe. On a smaller scale, certain elements and particles are thought to be stable and may exist forever.

3. What is the concept of particle decay?

Particle decay is a phenomenon observed in quantum physics where a particle transforms into one or more other particles. This occurs when a particle is unstable and has excess energy that needs to be released. The decay process can involve the emission of radiation or the creation of new particles.

4. Are there any particles that are known to be eternal?

As mentioned earlier, protons are believed to be stable and may exist forever. This is due to the conservation of baryon number, which states that the number of baryons (particles made up of three quarks, such as protons and neutrons) in a closed system cannot change. Therefore, protons cannot decay into other particles, making them potentially eternal.

5. How do scientists study the lifespan of particles?

Scientists use various methods to study the lifespan of particles, including particle accelerators and detectors. By colliding particles at high speeds, scientists can observe the decay of unstable particles and measure their lifespans. Additionally, theoretical models and calculations based on quantum mechanics are also used to predict the lifespans of particles.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
878
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
2
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
371
Back
Top