Conservation of Mass - Does Burning Wood Convert Mass to Energy?

In summary, burning wood does result in a small loss of mass due to the energy released from chemical bonds, but it is not significant enough to be measured. In contrast, in high energy physics, the creation of a pair of electron-positron from a photon does result in a conversion of mass into energy, but it is a very small amount and not a part of classical mass conservation.
  • #1
Jules18
102
0
My chem teacher told me once that if you could gather all the atoms produced after burning a piece of wood, you would have the same amount of mass you started with.

Is this true, or does some of it get converted to energy?
I'm reading about "Pair Production and Annihilation", and the text says (sorry to quote a boring textbook) :
In general, converting mass into energy is a low-yield process. Burning wood or coal converts only a small percentage of the available energy.

So ...(please explain this to me like I'm a dumb high school kid, because I am) that means a little of the mass is converted to photons, right? Or no?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Yeah, a very tiny bit. Probably something like a millionth of a percent. You'd never actually be able to measure the difference.

For comparison, nuclear fusion converts (if I remember properly) about 0.3% of the initial mass into photon energy.
 
  • #3
Hi there,

Your teacher is saying the right thing. When you burn a piece of wood, you simply transform it into something else. There is energy freed from this process (touch the flame and you'll feel it), but it is not converted from the transformation of mass into energy. It is mainly energy that binds the molecules together, when burning will free some energy. This is a subject of classical chemistry.

Jules18 said:
I'm reading about "Pair Production and Annihilation", and the text says (sorry to quote a boring textbook)

Here you are talking about something completely different, which is in the field of high energy physics. If a photon has enough energy, it can loose its energy to create a pair of electron-positron. The process is rather complex, so I'll spare you the details, but for your information you would need a photon with 512keV ([tex]8.202 \times 10^{-15}J[/tex]). To make the story complete, if the photon has more energy than needed to create the pair of particles, the excess of energy will be given to the particle as kinetic energy.

The conservation of mass is a classical process, which does not include the creation of pair. Therefore, like mentioned in the post before, the creation of pair is a process that creates very, very, very, very, very little mass.

Cheers
 
  • #4
Jules18 said:
My chem teacher told me once that if you could gather all the atoms produced after burning a piece of wood, you would have the same amount of mass you started with.

Is this true, or does some of it get converted to energy?
I'm reading about "Pair Production and Annihilation", and the text says (sorry to quote a boring textbook) :So ...(please explain this to me like I'm a dumb high school kid, because I am) that means a little of the mass is converted to photons, right? Or no?

I believe you are correct... a small amount of mass IS lost when you burn wood, even though you still have all the same atoms you started with. The amount of mass lost is tiny, but it is real because there is mass associated with the energy of chemical bonds. You could not detect the difference in mass directly.

It may help to see just how tiny this amount of mass really is. Suppose you burn a kilogram of wood. Typically, that will release about 1.6*107 Joules of energy. The amount of mass converted to heat is about 1.8*10-10 kg, using (E = mc2, and c = 3*108 ms-1). You can't really hope to measure this mass loss, and so it's quite normal to say that chemical reactions conserve mass.

That's an approximation; but it's a pretty good one! In principle, however, you could weigh the difference, if you were able to weigh things to about 12 significant figures of accuracy. If you burned all the wood inside a sealed container, so that no atoms could escape, and then let that container radiate away the heat generated as photons, you would find the container weighs a tiny bit less.

Cheers -- sylas
 
  • #5
Thanks everyone for your extensive answers. XD
 
  • #6
I agree with Sylas. Let's consider a specific example. I looked at mass conservation in the reaction

6H2O + 6CO2 <--> C6H12O6 + 6O2

This is the well known photosynthesis reaction, in which about 29 eV of heat-of-combustion energy is stored in the sugar molecule. The question is whether that extra 29 eV of energy is stored as extra mass. It is a very small amount, compared to 180 + 192 = 372 AMU (atomic mass units) = about 346 billion eV stored in the sugar + oxygen, but the energy has to be stored somewhere, and there is nowhere else to store it.
 
  • #7
sylas said:
I believe you are correct... a small amount of mass IS lost when you burn wood, even though you still have all the same atoms you started with. The amount of mass lost is tiny, but it is real because there is mass associated with the energy of chemical bonds. You could not detect the difference in mass directly.

It may help to see just how tiny this amount of mass really is. Suppose you burn a kilogram of wood. Typically, that will release about 1.6*107 Joules of energy. The amount of mass converted to heat is about 1.8*10-10 kg, using (E = mc2, and c = 3*108 ms-1). You can't really hope to measure this mass loss, and so it's quite normal to say that chemical reactions conserve mass.

That's an approximation; but it's a pretty good one! In principle, however, you could weigh the difference, if you were able to weigh things to about 12 significant figures of accuracy. If you burned all the wood inside a sealed container, so that no atoms could escape, and then let that container radiate away the heat generated as photons, you would find the container weighs a tiny bit less.

Cheers -- sylas
I don't know if you consider it valid but no mass is lost.
As you stated a small amount is radiated away as photons and escape the container.
But they are out there somewhere in the universe so they are conserved which is part of the Conservation of matter.
 
Last edited:
  • #8
Buckleymanor said:
I don't know if you consider it valid but no mass is lost.
As you stated a small amount is radiated away as photons and escape the container.
But they are out there somewhere in the universe so they are conserved which is part of the Conservation of matter.

You mean conservation of energy. Photons are not matter.

The question is whether the mass of all the chemical reagents is changed by the chemical reaction. It is, technically, by an amount so tiny that it can't really be measured effectively. Conservation of energy means that the mass loss of the reagents is balanced by the energy radiated out into the rest of the universe.
 
  • #9
sylas said:
You mean conservation of energy. Photons are not matter.

The question is whether the mass of all the chemical reagents is changed by the chemical reaction. It is, technically, by an amount so tiny that it can't really be measured effectively. Conservation of energy means that the mass loss of the reagents is balanced by the energy radiated out into the rest of the universe.
Possibly, the Conservation of Matter states "if I remember correctly" that matter can not be created or destroyed but can be changed into another form.
Photons don't have mass but they do have energy so they are a changed form of mass.
I might be confusing the conservation of energy with the conservation of mass.
 

1. How does burning wood convert mass to energy?

When wood is burned, it undergoes a chemical reaction called combustion. During this process, the bonds between the atoms in the wood are broken, releasing energy in the form of heat and light. The remaining byproducts of the combustion, such as carbon dioxide and water vapor, have a lower mass than the original wood. This difference in mass is where the conversion from mass to energy occurs.

2. Is it possible for mass to be destroyed during the burning of wood?

No, according to the law of conservation of mass, mass cannot be created or destroyed. This means that even though the mass of the burned wood may seem to have disappeared, it has actually been converted into different forms, such as energy and byproducts like ash and smoke.

3. What happens to the energy released during the burning of wood?

The energy released during the burning of wood is released in the form of heat and light. This energy can be used for various purposes, such as heating a room or cooking food. However, some of the energy is also lost to the surroundings in the form of heat and light that are not utilized.

4. Does burning wood result in a net loss of mass?

No, burning wood does not result in a net loss of mass. As mentioned before, the mass of the burned wood is converted into different forms, such as energy and byproducts. Therefore, the overall mass of the system remains the same.

5. Can the conservation of mass be applied to other forms of energy production?

Yes, the conservation of mass can be applied to all forms of energy production. Whenever energy is produced, there will be a corresponding change in mass, whether it is an increase or decrease. For example, when fossil fuels are burned to produce energy, the mass of the fuel decreases, while the mass of the byproducts, such as carbon dioxide, increases.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
696
  • Classical Physics
Replies
23
Views
1K
  • Mechanics
Replies
3
Views
949
Replies
6
Views
10K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Mechanics
Replies
27
Views
10K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
408
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
829
Back
Top