No SR time dilation without Lorentz contraction

In summary, SR time dilation and Lorentz contraction are two sides of the same coin and always occur together. This duality is necessary for light to always travel at the speed of c in every local inertial frame. In a scenario where a Lorentz spatial contraction is offset by positive spatial curvature caused by gravity, SR time dilation is eliminated. This is because the locally measured space between the test particle and the point mass is flat due to the counteracting effects of Lorentz contraction and spatial curvature. This also prevents any SR time dilation from occurring. This is not referring to gravitational time dilation, which will still occur in this scenario. The trinity of length contraction, time dilation, and relativity of simultaneity is preserved
  • #1
nutgeb
294
1
My understanding is that SR time dilation and Lorentz contraction are flip sides of the same coin. The two always occur together, never separately. That is implicit in spacetime diagrams. I think this duality requirement is necessary so that light always travels at the speed of c in every local inertial frame.

So a question occurs to me. In a scenario where a Lorentz spatial contraction is exactly offset by positive spatial curvature caused by gravity, is SR time dilation implicitly eliminated?

Consider first an empty Milne model cosmology in Minkowski space. Test particles all depart the origin at t = 0 and move away from it in uniform quantities at all speeds up to but not including c. At any point in time the distribution of test particles (as observed from the origin) is inhomogeneous, because the farther a particle is from the origin, the faster it is moving, and therefore the more Lorentz contracted the radial distance is between the origin and the particle. Clocks attached to the test particles are time dilated (relative to the origin clock) in the same proportion as the Lorentz contraction of the particle's distance to the origin.

Now consider a Schwarzschild idealized point mass in empty space. The Schwarzschild metric says that the point mass causes a positive spatial curvature which manifests itself physically as a radial expansion of distances from the point mass. This radial expansion is a function of radial proximity to the point mass -- the closer a test particle is, the greater the proportional radial expansion of distance due to positive spatial curvature. If a test particle is moving radially away from, or toward, the point mass at exactly the escape velocity of the point mass, then this radial expansion of distance mathematically exactly offsets the radial contraction of distance (between the point mass and the test particle) caused by the SR Lorentz contraction resulting from the test particle's velocity. The result is that, in this scenario, the test particle locally measures the space between itself and the point mass to be flat -- zero spatial curvature. (I'm not referring to spacetime curvature, which obviously isn't zero here.)

I submit that because the locally positive spatial curvature in this scenario has counteracted the Lorentz contraction of the distance between the point mass and the test particle, it also prevents any SR time dilation from occurring, as between the test particle and the point mass. Returning to first principles, SR time dilation cannot occur in the absence of Lorentz contraction. Otherwise the locally measured speed of light would depart from c.

In this scenario I'm not referring to gravitational time dilation. The Schwarzschild metric says that gravitational time dilation will occur here as between the point mass and the test particle. Specifically, a clock at the point mass will run slower than the test particle's clock, because the point mass is deeper in its own gravity well than the test particle is.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Actually, it's a "trinity:" length contraction, time dilation, and relativity of simultaneity.
 
  • #3
Yes, I agree it's a trinity. Simultaneity also must be preserved if Lorentz contraction is counteracted by the positive spatial curvature caused by gravity.
 

1) What is the concept of time dilation in special relativity?

Time dilation is a phenomenon in special relativity where time appears to pass slower for an object in motion relative to an observer. This means that time is not constant and can be affected by the relative speed of an object.

2) How does Lorentz contraction relate to time dilation?

Lorentz contraction is the shortening of an object's length in the direction of its motion, as predicted by special relativity. This effect is closely related to time dilation, as both are consequences of the same fundamental principle - that the speed of light is constant in all inertial reference frames.

3) Is it possible to have time dilation without Lorentz contraction?

Yes, it is possible to have time dilation without Lorentz contraction. This can occur in scenarios where an object is moving at a constant velocity but there is no change in its length, such as in circular motion.

4) What implications does this have for our understanding of time and space?

The concept of time dilation without Lorentz contraction challenges our traditional understanding of time and space. It suggests that time is not absolute and can be affected by motion, and that space is not rigid and can be distorted by an object's speed.

5) Are there any practical applications of this concept?

Yes, the principles of time dilation and Lorentz contraction have practical applications in various fields such as GPS technology, particle accelerators, and satellite communication. Understanding these effects is crucial for accurate measurements and calculations in these fields.

Similar threads

Replies
63
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
45
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
974
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
58
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
60
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top