New Reply

gravity question: force vs spacetime curvature

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Feb21-13, 09:45 AM   #1
 

gravity question: force vs spacetime curvature


So Newton says that gravity is an attractive force and some people believe in gravitons to transmit that attractive force, but Einstein says the attraction is actually due to moving along the curvature of spacetime (caused by the bodies' mass). I'm not asking which is correct, but my question is this: If space was completely empty except for two metal spheres which were completely motionless (relative to some unknown absolute coordinate frame), would those two spheres be attracted to each other? If so, what is the mechanism producing the force?

This has confused me for a long time.. Thanks
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Ants and carnivorous plants conspire for mutualistic feeding
>> Forecast for Titan: Wild weather could be ahead
>> Researchers stitch defects into the world's thinnest semiconductor
Feb21-13, 10:14 AM   #2
 
Why wouldn't they?
According to the modern established theory of gravitation (Einstein's theory of relativity, not Newton's, which is a weak-field slow-varying approximation of Einstein's, nor graviton or some gauge-theory, which tries to be a theory to which Einstein's is itself a weak-field approximation) the two massive spheres would create curvature and each one would "roll down the hill" created by the other.
Feb21-13, 01:01 PM   #3
 
ok, but what mechanism causes them to "roll down the hill"? something must be causing a force on the spheres to accelerate them... ?
Feb21-13, 01:20 PM   #4
 
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor

gravity question: force vs spacetime curvature


Quote by xlsdx View Post
ok, but what mechanism causes them to "roll down the hill"? something must be causing a force on the spheres to accelerate them... ?
That "roll down the hill" metaphor isn't very good, because it just prompts people to ask exactly that question. There's an IMO much better explanation in the video in this thread: http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=669096
Feb21-13, 01:36 PM   #5
 
Yeah, I might not have been very accurate. See the thread Nugatory advised you. In GR there is no 'gravitational force'. Gravitational effects are nothing more than inertial effects, and the sphere feels these effects because it has inertia. See the thread, it's very good.
Feb21-13, 01:57 PM   #6
 
those diagrams are making some sense. so the "motion" that actually causes two static objects to attract (roll down the hill) is actually their motion through time.. so even if they're not moving spatially, they're still moving temporally which moves them around the cone. do i have this correct?
Feb21-13, 02:04 PM   #7
 
Recognitions:
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Quote by xlsdx View Post
those diagrams are making some sense. so the "motion" that actually causes two static objects to attract (roll down the hill) is actually their motion through time.. so even if they're not moving spatially, they're still moving temporally which moves them around the cone. do i have this correct?
Pretty much, yes.
New Reply

Tags
gravity
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: gravity question: force vs spacetime curvature
Thread Forum Replies
Gravity from spacetime curvature Special & General Relativity 1
Does the curvature of SpaceTime Disprove gravity? Special & General Relativity 3
Black Holes, Quantum Gravity and the Curvature of spacetime Special & General Relativity 34
Gravity and curvature in spacetime General Astronomy 5
how gravity arises from spacetime curvature? General Physics 29