Register to reply 
Emitter Coupled Oscillator 
Share this thread: 
#1
Jan2614, 10:26 AM

P: 103

Hello folks,
I've been trying to understand how crystals work in crystal oscillator circuits. I understand the piezoelectric effect to the following extent: If we apply an electric field to the crystal it will deform and when the field is removed, the crystal will generate an electric field in the opposite direction. I get stuck at the point where the electric field is removed. I can't seem to understand how the electric field is removed in crystal oscillator circuits. I've attached a diagram of a crystal oscillator circuit. I'm looking for a qualitative analysis of the circuit without using the RLC model of a crystal. I'm trying to understand what exactly happens to the crystal during oscillation. What I'm looking for in terms of an analysis, is an explanation similar to the following one: base voltage of Q1 increases, which increases voltage at the emitter which increases current through R1, etc, etc, etc, around the loop. Thanks. 


#2
Jan2714, 08:17 AM

Sci Advisor
Thanks
P: 1,955

A crystal is an insulator so it can be operated with a permanent bias voltage.
The electric field is not really removed, it is cyclically reversed about the average bias point. 


#3
Jan2714, 09:07 AM

P: 1,822

The key to the oscillation is the capacitor. When you apply power to the circuit, current flows into the base of Q1 which causes V(Q1c) to drop. The rate of change of that voltage is what passes through the capacitor, not the voltage itself. Eventually the voltage at Q1c stops dropping and at that point the base of Q2 stops seeing the negative voltage from the capacitor. V(Q2c) now starts to fall, lowering V(Q1b), lowering the voltage across the crystal and raising V(Q1c) which causes V(Q2c) to increase even more.



#4
Jan2714, 11:34 AM

Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 12,256

Emitter Coupled Oscillator
With the crystal in the emitter, the gain of the stage goes to a maximum at the series resonance frequency so the (positive) feedback C supports the oscillation.



#5
Jan2714, 11:40 AM

P: 127

For an even more generic analysis... think of the crystal as a freqvariable emitter degeneration resistor. At the crystal freq, it permits (ac) current flow, at all other frequencies it presents a high impedance and through negative feedback (emitter degeneration) it blocks Q1 from amplifying.



#6
Jan2714, 11:50 AM

Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 12,256

The point about a crystal is that it has an extremely narrow frequency band where the impedance goes very low. At other frequencies (+/ 0.0001%) it looks like either a very small Capacitor or a very large Inductor. (This is just another way of saying it has a very narrow resonance bandwidth.)



#7
Jan2714, 01:23 PM

Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 12,256




#8
Jan2714, 04:13 PM

Sci Advisor
Thanks
P: 1,955

Correct. The frequency of oscillation will not be at the crystal's resonant frequency because at resonance the crystal impedance will be a maximum, so circuit gain will be a minimum. The oscillation frequency will therefore be offset slightly onto the shoulder of the resonance where the crystal behaves more like a phase shifting trap. For that reason this design of oscillator will not be frequency stable.



#9
Jan2714, 04:43 PM

Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 12,256




#10
Jan2714, 05:27 PM

P: 103




#11
Jan2714, 06:17 PM

Sci Advisor
Thanks
P: 1,955

Sophiecentaur; Voltage gain is not the only criteria. Phase is also important. A crystal in that circuit is most unlikely to ever operate at either it's parallel or it's series resonant frequency. It will slide to some operating point part way between the two, hence the poor frequency stability.
I have a theory that the vast majority of oscillators are named after unsuccessful amplifier inventors who, in their search for the Holy Grail of a perfect amplifier, experimented with feedback. They find that there is always some frequency where they cannot control the regeneration. There are a great many eponymous oscillators, yet very few named amplifier configurations. 


#12
Jan2814, 05:55 AM

Sci Advisor
Thanks
PF Gold
P: 12,256

I take your point about the crystal. I will stop worrying about it. Suffice to say that the open loop gain is small in magnitude and there will be a frequency for which the phase around the loop is right to make it oscillate. Unlike in a 'proper' crystal oscillator, the feedback capacitor value becomes more relevant than the presence of the crystal might suggest. 


#13
Jan2814, 10:25 AM

P: 127




#14
Jan2814, 01:07 PM

Sci Advisor
Thanks
P: 1,955

The circuit in the OP is from; CRYSTAL OSCILLATOR CIRCUITS. Revised Edition, 1992, by Robert J. Matthys.
The title "MODIFIED MEACHAM" on the diagram refers to discussion of a different design beginning at the bottom of page 53. The text on page 53 that accompanies the diagram reads as follows: 


Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Maximum Power Transfer for Coupled Emitter Follower  Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework  7  
Simulating a NAND/AND gate in Emitter Coupled Logic?  Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework  5  
Coupled Harmonic Oscillator or coupled SturmLiouville problem  Differential Equations  0  
Coupled Oscillator  Introductory Physics Homework  1  
Coupled Oscillator  Advanced Physics Homework  0 