- #1
ajclarke
- 35
- 1
Hello.
I have been working through some questions and answers to do with cosmology. One of them asks you to consider a model where:
[tex]\Omega_{MO}=3 [/tex]
[tex]\Omega_{\Lambda O}=0.01 [/tex]
[tex]\Omega_{RO}=0 [/tex]
and asks you to show mathematically that the model re-collapses.
Following through the math, I get three values of a: -14.87,1.51 and 13.36.
Clearly the first can be disregarded and unphysical since a cannot be negative, but I can't decide what's the significance between the second two which allows me to isolate the value corresponding to collapse.
Cheers.
Adam
I have been working through some questions and answers to do with cosmology. One of them asks you to consider a model where:
[tex]\Omega_{MO}=3 [/tex]
[tex]\Omega_{\Lambda O}=0.01 [/tex]
[tex]\Omega_{RO}=0 [/tex]
and asks you to show mathematically that the model re-collapses.
Following through the math, I get three values of a: -14.87,1.51 and 13.36.
Clearly the first can be disregarded and unphysical since a cannot be negative, but I can't decide what's the significance between the second two which allows me to isolate the value corresponding to collapse.
Cheers.
Adam