Gibbs Free Energy and the Grand Potential


by Useful nucleus
Tags: energy, free, gibbs, grand, potential
Useful nucleus
Useful nucleus is offline
#1
Aug12-13, 02:41 PM
Useful nucleus's Avatar
P: 240
Gibbs Free Energy is the appropriate potential when there is both heat exchange and mechanical work (G=E-TS+PV). On the other hand the grand potential is appropriate when there is heat exchange and chemical work (g=E-TS-μN).
Is there any issue in defining a potential of the form (E-TS-μN+PV) such that it is conserved in some ensemble? If there is no problem, is there a consensus on a name for such potential and its corresponding ensemble?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Researchers find tin selenide shows promise for efficiently converting waste heat into electrical energy
After 13 years, progress in pitch-drop experiment (w/ video)
Global scientific team 'visualizes' a new crystallization process (w/ video)
DrDu
DrDu is online now
#2
Aug13-13, 05:34 AM
Sci Advisor
P: 3,367
The problem is probably that the corresponding potential vanishes identically as G=mu N and g=-PV. You need the potential to depend on at least one extensive variable. If not, you can no longer specify the amount of substance you are talking about.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Difference between enthalpy, Helmholtz free energy,& Gibbs free energy Classical Physics 1
Gibbs free energy Classical Physics 3
Gibbs free energy Chemistry 0
Gibbs free energy Classical Physics 2
Gibbs Free energy Biology, Chemistry & Other Homework 3