Continuity of $f(x)$ at 0 Using $g_r(x)$

  • Thread starter vintwc
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Continuity
In summary, the conversation discusses a function f:\mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R} and its continuity at 0. It is stated that if for all r>0 there exists a continuous function g_r \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R} such that |g_r (x) - f(x)| < r for |x| < 1, then f is continuous at 0. The equations and attempted solution show that this is true, and it is concluded that f is continuous at 0.
  • #1
vintwc
24
0

Homework Statement



If [itex]f:\mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}[/itex] is such that for all [itex]r>0[/itex] there exists a continuous function [itex]g_r \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}[/itex] such that [itex]|g_r (x) - f(x)| < r[/itex] for [itex]|x| < 1[/itex] then f is continuous at 0.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


When [itex]|x| < \delta _g[/itex], [itex]|g_r (x) - g_r (0)| < \epsilon '[/itex] ...(1)
When [itex]|x| < 1[/itex], [itex]|g_r (x) - f(x)| < r[/itex] , i.e. [itex]|f(x) - g_r (x)| < r[/itex] ...(2)
[itex]|g_r(0) - f(0)| < r[/itex] ...(3)

Adding (1) and (2) gives [itex]|f(x) - g_r (0)| < \epsilon ' + r[/itex] ...(4)
Adding (3) and (4) gives [itex]|f(x) - f(0)| < \epsilon ' + 2r[/itex]
So when |x| is the [itex] \min\{1, \delta_g\}[/itex] , [itex]|f(x) - f(0)| < \epsilon[/itex]
And by the previous result, we can say that f is continuous at 0.

Not sure whether its right for me to take the [itex]\delta = \min\{1, \delta_g\}[/itex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I think it is ok, though it doesn't make much sense to have delta greater than 1 anyway...
 

1. What is the definition of continuity for a function at a specific point?

The definition of continuity at a point, such as 0, for a function f(x) is that the limit of the function as x approaches the point must equal the value of the function at that point. In other words, the function must be "smooth" and have no sudden jumps or breaks at that point.

2. How is continuity of a function at 0 determined using g_r(x)?

To determine continuity at 0 using g_r(x), we need to evaluate the limit of g_r(x) as x approaches 0. If the limit exists and is equal to the value of g_r(0), then the function is continuous at 0. If the limit does not exist or is not equal to g_r(0), then the function is not continuous at 0.

3. What is the significance of using g_r(x) to determine continuity at 0?

Using g_r(x) allows us to determine continuity at 0 for a function f(x) by breaking down the function into simpler, more manageable pieces. It allows us to focus on the behavior of the function near 0, rather than the entire function.

4. Can a function be continuous at 0 but not differentiable at 0?

Yes, a function can be continuous at 0 but not differentiable at 0. This means that the limit of the function as x approaches 0 exists and is equal to the value of the function at 0, but the derivative of the function at 0 does not exist.

5. How can we use g_r(x) to prove continuity at 0 for a specific function?

To prove continuity at 0 for a specific function using g_r(x), we need to show that the limit of g_r(x) as x approaches 0 exists and is equal to the value of the function at 0. This can be done by evaluating the limit algebraically or graphically and showing that it is equal to the value of the function at 0.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
26
Views
878
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
828
Replies
1
Views
608
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
826
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
2
Replies
51
Views
3K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
850
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
26
Views
2K
Back
Top