Proof that (2n)/[n(n+1)] is natural for natural n

In summary, the conversation discussed the problem of proving that the expression (6*(2n)!)/(n!(n+1)!(n+2)) is a natural number. Various approaches were suggested, including using binomial coefficients, Catalan numbers, and induction. The conversation also touched on the general properties of binomial coefficients and their relationship to counting methods. Ultimately, a proof by induction was suggested as the most effective approach.
  • #1
pig
94
0
I tried induction, but got no results. What I get is:

f(n+1) = 4f(n) - 6f(n)/(n+2)

So now I'd have to prove that 6*(2n)!/[n!(n+1)!(n+2)] is natural, which would be going in circles.

I tried to go directly, but came up with nothing good. It can be written as [2n over (n-1)] / n, but I still didn't manage to prove it.

Can anyone help? :confused:

By the way, I got this problem from a high school kid who was supposed to prove it by induction, so I presume I'm missing something obvious here?

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Let B(n,k) be the usual binomial coefficient: n!/[k!(n-k)!].

B(2n,n)=(2n)!/[n!(2n-n)!]=(2n)!/[n!n!]=(n+1)(2n)!/[n!(n+1)!]=(n+1)f(n)

f(n)=B(2n,n)/(n+1).

f(n)=B(2n,n)=2n(2n-1)...(n+1)n/(n+1)=2n(2n-1)...(n+2)n.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
This series of numbers is called Catalan numbers: 1,2,5,14,42,132,492..and represent, among other things, the number of ways that votes of Yes or No can be counted if the vote is evenly split and the yes's are never behind in the counting. For example for 4 voters
we have: YYNN and YNYN.

This is equal to [tex]\frac{4!}{2!3!}=2[/tex]

See: http://www-gap.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Miscellaneous/CatalanNumbers/catalan.html
 
Last edited:
  • #4
phoenixthoth said:
Let B(n,k) be the usual binomial coefficient: n!/[k!(n-k)!].

B(2n,n)=(2n)!/[n!(2n-n)!]=(2n)!/[n!n!]=(n+1)(2n)!/[n!(n+1)!]=(n+1)f(n)

f(n)=B(2n,n)/(n+1).

f(n)=B(2n,n)=2n(2n-1)...(n+1)n/(n+1)=2n(2n-1)...(n+2)n.

Thank you but I don't really seem to get this...

f(n) = B(2n, n)/(n+1)

I got this and didn't know what do do with it... B(2n, n) isn't:
2n(2n-1)...(n+1)n
It's:
2n(2n-1)...(n+1)/(1*2*3*4*...*n)
So we get, for f(n):
2n(2n-1)...(n+2)/(1*2*3*4*...*n)
Which is B(2n, n-1)/n

I think :confused:

Robert thank you for the information, I'll try to google a proof.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
This is from the internet: The Catalan Numbers also turn up in Pascal's Triangle. If one takes the element in Pascal's Triangle given by the binomial coefficient (2n!)/(n!n!) and subtracts the adjacent element (2n!)/[(n+1)!(n-1)!] the result is the Nth Catalan Number.

http://www.saintanns.k12.ny.us/depart/math/Seth/intro.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #6
I think we're trying to make this way too complicated. Here is an induction proof:

1. Show that it is true for n=1. And it is, for n=1 we get 2n!/n!(n+1)! = 1 Which is a natural number

2. Now, we show that if it is true for k, where k is any natural number, it is true for k+1.

3. For k+1 we get, 2(k+1)!/(k+1)!(k+2)! = 2(k+1)k!/(k+1)k!(k+1)(k+1)! = 2k!/k!(k+1)! (look carefully at all the factors of (k+1) and see how they cancel)

4. Since we have now shown that it is true for n =1 and if it is true for k, it is also true for k+1, then by the principle of induction it is true for all natural numbers.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
This also looks wrong to me, but it's too late now, I'll look more closely tomorrow.
 
  • #8
It is indeed wrong, 2(k+1)!/((k+1)!(k+2)!) = 2(k+1)k!/((k+1)k!(k+2)(k+1)!).
 
  • #9
Muzza said:
It is indeed wrong, 2(k+1)!/((k+1)!(k+2)!) = 2(k+1)k!/((k+1)k!(k+2)(k+1)!).

Yep, you're right. In fact, it's wrong on a couple levels. My sincere apologies. I will more carefully check my posts before posting them in the future!
 
  • #10
Ok I made some progress but it still isn't complete:

(a over b means the binominal coefficient)

(2n!)/[n!(n+1)!]
= (2n)!/[n!n!(n+1)]
= (2n)!(n+1-n)/[n!n!(n+1)]
= [(2n!)(n+1) - (2n!)n]/[n!n!(n+1)]
= (2n!)(n+1)/[n!n!(n+1)] - (2n!)n/[n!n!(n+1)]
= (2n!)/(n!n!) - (2n!)/[(n-1)!(n+1)!]
= (2n!)/(n!n!) - (2n!)/[(n-1)!(2n-n+1)!]
= (2n over n)-(2n over n-1)

Now, (2n over n-1)=(2n over n) * n/(n+1)

Since n/(n+1) < 1, (2n over n-1) < (2n over n) so (2n over n)-(2n over n-1) > 0, so this proves positivity.

But for this to work I still need to prove that the binominal coefficient itself is natural :confused: Anyone? I have a feeling this could even be a "textbook proof"... And google refuses to give me anything useful these days :frown:
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Hi

I don't know if this is going to help, but if you write (2n)!/[(n!)(n+1)!] as ((2n)!/[n!]^2)*(n!/(n+1)!) then you have to prove that 2nCn is divisible by (n+1) for all n >= 0.

TeXifying it...

[tex]
\frac{(2n)!}{n!(n+1)!} = \frac{(2n)!}{(n!)^{2}} \frac{n!}{(n+1)!} = \frac{^{2n}C_{n}}{n+1}[/tex]

I'm sorry if I restated somebody else's suggestion/solution (I haven't had the time to read each and every post in this thread).

Cheers
Vivek
 
Last edited:
  • #12
pig said:
Ok I made some progress but it still isn't complete:

(a over b means the binominal coefficient)

(2n!)/[n!(n+1)!]
= (2n)!/[n!n!(n+1)]
= (2n)!(n+1-n)/[n!n!(n+1)]
= [(2n!)(n+1) - (2n!)n]/[n!n!(n+1)]
= (2n!)(n+1)/[n!n!(n+1)] - (2n!)n/[n!n!(n+1)]
= (2n!)/(n!n!) - (2n!)/[(n-1)!(n+1)!]
= (2n!)/(n!n!) - (2n!)/[(n-1)!(2n-n+1)!]
= (2n over n)-(2n over n-1)

Now, (2n over n-1)=(2n over n) * n/(n+1)

Since n/(n+1) < 1, (2n over n-1) < (2n over n) so (2n over n)-(2n over n-1) > 0, so this proves positivity.

But for this to work I still need to prove that the binominal coefficient itself is natural :confused: Anyone? I have a feeling this could even be a "textbook proof"... And google refuses to give me anything useful these days :frown:

Algebraically prove the identity B(n+1,k)=B(n,k)+B(n,k-1) and then use induction.
 
  • #13
i really don't understand the problem,
i think robert has already given two proofs to the problem ...

as to proving binomial coefficients as natural,
in (1+x)^n,
the coefficients C(n,r) represent the number of ways i can choose 'r' (1+x)'s out of the 'n' (1+x)'s since they would be contributing to the term x^i ... since this is a counting argument , the value must be a natural value.

-- AI
 
  • #14
We can also show a theorem: N! divides the product of any n successive integers (wthout remainer). This then shows that (n+a)!/a! is also divisible by n!. I refer to Gokul43201 number theory problem dealing with the zeros of 1994!

:https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=35582

The number of times that p, a prime, divides n! is: [tex]\sum_{i>0} [\frac{n}{p^i}][/tex] where the parenthesis represent the greatest integer in n divided by p^i.

Skipping a little ahead because of the latex, the inequality we want is:

[tex]\sum_{i>0}[\frac{n+a}{p}][/tex] greater than or equal to:[tex]\sum_{i>0}[\frac{n}{p}]+\sum_{i>0}[\frac{a}{p}][/tex] for all p.

This comes about because let n=kp+r for r less than p and positive or zero, and let a=jp+y, y same conditions as above, then greatest integer in n+a =k+j + greatest integer in (r+y)/p which is greater than or equal to k+J.
 
Last edited:

1. What does the term "natural" mean in this context?

In mathematics, natural numbers refer to the set of positive integers (1, 2, 3, ...), which do not include fractions, decimals, or negative numbers.

2. How is the proof for (2n)/[n(n+1)] being natural derived?

The proof is derived by using mathematical induction, which is a method of mathematical proof that involves showing that a statement holds true for a specific value (in this case, n = 1), and then proving that if it holds true for one value, it also holds true for the next value (i.e. n+1).

3. Can you provide an example of the proof for (2n)/[n(n+1)] being natural?

Sure. Let's take n = 1. Substituting this value into the equation, we get (2*1)/[1(1+1)] = 2/2 = 1, which is a natural number. Now, assuming that the equation holds true for n = k (i.e. (2k)/[k(k+1)] is natural), we can show that it also holds true for n = k+1 (i.e. (2(k+1))/[(k+1)((k+1)+1)] is natural). This can be proved by algebraically manipulating the equation (2(k+1))/[(k+1)((k+1)+1)] = (2k+2)/(k^2+2k+1+k+1) = (2k+2)/(k^2+3k+2) = (2k)/[k(k+1)] + (2k+2)/[k(k+1)] = [2(k)/k + 2/(k+1)] + [2k+2/(k+1)^2], which is a sum of two natural numbers and therefore, a natural number itself.

4. What is the significance of proving that (2n)/[n(n+1)] is natural?

This proof is significant in the field of mathematics as it demonstrates the power and usefulness of mathematical induction in proving statements about natural numbers. It also helps to establish the fundamental properties of natural numbers and their relationships with other mathematical concepts.

5. Are there any real-life applications of this proof?

While this proof may not have direct real-life applications, the concepts and methods used in this proof can be applied to various areas of mathematics and other fields, such as computer science and engineering, where induction is used to prove the correctness of algorithms or systems.

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
626
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
751
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • General Math
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
583
Replies
3
Views
812
Back
Top