Evolution not completely random according to an experiment

In summary, an experiment conducted at Princeton University has shown that evolution mutations are not completely random. This challenges the idea that proteins have a "mind of their own" and suggests that nature has been carrying out its own experiments in the process of evolution. The book "Inside the Human Genome" by John C. Avise is recommended for further reading on this topic.
  • #1
WaveJumper
771
1
Evolution mutations not completely random according to an experiment

I wondered for a while where to post this link, but since it will probably provoke questions on the origins of this new guiding mechanism of evolution, i decided it had to land here(it will be a matter of time till someone raises the question "Do proteins have a mind of their own?"). Here is the link to an experiment carried out in the Chemistry Department of Princeton University :


http://www.princeton.edu/main/news/archive/S22/60/95O56/index.xml?section=topstories



What are your thoughts?
 
Last edited:
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #2
Also see http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/11/prediction_selfpromoting_hype.php" .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
It looks like they invented the wheel.

The non-randomness of the process of evolution has been accepted by science for a long time. Nature has been doing her own 'experiments' which merely need to be observed.

You might enjoy this book:
"Inside the Human Genome" by John C. Avise
 
  • #4
The OP is no longer a member here, so this thread is closed.
 
  • #5


I find this experiment and its findings to be very intriguing. It challenges the traditional view of evolution as a completely random process and suggests that there may be some guiding mechanism at play. This is a significant discovery, as it has the potential to change our understanding of how evolution occurs.

The fact that the researchers were able to observe specific mutations occurring in response to environmental stressors is groundbreaking. It suggests that there may be some level of communication or coordination between the proteins within an organism, which ultimately influences its evolutionary path.

However, it is important to note that this experiment was conducted in a controlled laboratory setting and may not accurately reflect the complex and dynamic nature of evolution in the natural world. Further research and experimentation will be needed to fully understand the implications of these findings.

Overall, this experiment provides valuable insight into the mechanisms of evolution and opens up new avenues for exploration in this field. It highlights the need for continued research and a deeper understanding of the complexities of life and its evolution.
 

1. How was the experiment conducted to show that evolution is not completely random?

The experiment involved creating a controlled environment with a specific set of conditions for a population of organisms to live in. The organisms were then observed over a period of time to see if any changes occurred in their genetic makeup. This allowed for the study of natural selection and the role it plays in evolution.

2. What were the results of the experiment?

The results showed that certain traits were more likely to be passed down to the next generation, indicating that there is a non-random selection process at work in evolution. This supports the idea that natural selection plays a significant role in shaping the genetic makeup of a population over time.

3. How does this experiment challenge the idea of evolution being completely random?

By showing that certain traits are more likely to be passed down, the experiment challenges the notion that evolution is completely random. It suggests that there is a mechanism at work in nature that selects for certain traits, rather than just random chance determining which traits are passed down.

4. What implications does this have for our understanding of evolution?

This experiment highlights the importance of natural selection in the process of evolution. It suggests that there is a purposeful and non-random aspect to the changes that occur in a population over time. It also opens up new avenues for further research and understanding of how evolution works.

5. How does this experiment relate to the theory of evolution?

The experiment provides evidence that supports the theory of evolution by natural selection. It shows that evolution is not a completely random process, but rather a result of the non-random selection of certain advantageous traits over time. This aligns with the principles of natural selection proposed by Charles Darwin in his theory of evolution.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
26
Views
19K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top