Foil Helmets Can't Foil Government Mind Probes

In summary, the conversation discusses the use of foil hats and stainless steel colander helmets for protection against mind control frequencies from the CIA. The conversation also mentions a leak of intelligence about these helmets being posted on the civilian internet. It is also mentioned that someone used a foil hat under their helmet while working in the aviation industry. The conversation ends with a humorous remark about the fine line between genius and insanity.
  • #1
WarrenPlatts
134
0
http://people.csail.mit.edu/rahimi/helmet/ [Broken]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
That's hilarious!
 
  • #4
Upload data @ CIA
This is mindless government drone #503A-005d/1
We have a intellgence leak about the Drone helments.That citzens like to think that they protect them form the CIA's mind control satlets apparentally
Some egineers found that appilfies the mind controll freqeuncies.They have now posted it on the civillan internet...wrong datalink..oh well
 
  • #5
I could have told you that foil hats were worse than worthless. Its stainless steel colander helmets that really do the trick!
 
  • #6
I used to know of a guy who wore a foil hat under this helmet so that the "people" living in the middle Earth couldn't read his mind. Having learned of him from a customer, I was told that he tested the integrity of critical steel beams used in the aviation industry.
 
  • #7
Ivan Seeking said:
I used to know of a guy who wore a foil hat under this helmet so that the "people" living in the middle Earth couldn't read his mind. Having learned of him from a customer, I was told that he tested the integrity of critical steel beams used in the aviation industry.
Wow, it's scary when someone dancing so near the line between insanity and intelligence, dances a tango (way too many dips). :bugeye:
 
  • #8
FIIINE line between Genius and Googoo there. >__>
 

1. What is the theory behind "Foil Helmets Can't Foil Government Mind Probes"?

The theory behind this is that aluminum foil helmets are not effective in blocking out electromagnetic waves or signals that may be used in government mind control experiments. The belief is that these signals can still penetrate through the foil and reach the brain.

2. Is there any scientific evidence to support this theory?

So far, there is no scientific evidence to support the idea that foil helmets can block out government mind probes. Studies have shown that aluminum foil is not an effective shield against electromagnetic waves and does not provide any protection against such signals.

3. Why do people believe that foil helmets can protect against mind control?

The belief in foil helmets as a protection against mind control may stem from a popular culture reference in a TV show, as well as conspiracy theories and misinformation. Some individuals may also feel a sense of control and empowerment by taking steps to protect themselves against perceived threats.

4. Are there any other materials that can effectively block mind control signals?

There is currently no known material that can effectively block out government mind control signals. However, there are other measures that individuals can take to protect their privacy and limit exposure to these signals, such as using encryption and minimizing use of electronic devices.

5. What is the scientific consensus on this topic?

The scientific consensus is that foil helmets are not effective in blocking out government mind probes. The concept of mind control through electromagnetic waves is also not supported by scientific evidence. However, further research is needed to fully understand the effects of electromagnetic waves on the brain and potential privacy concerns surrounding their use.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Materials and Chemical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top