Register to reply 
Bell's derivation; socks and Jaynesby harrylin
Tags: bell socks jaynes 
Share this thread: 
#91
Mar1612, 03:27 PM

P: 3,181




#92
Mar1612, 03:41 PM

P: 3,181




#93
Mar1612, 11:04 PM

P: 97

The data shows that the events A and B are dependent not independent, an assumption made by Bell. The P(A)*P(B/A) ≠ P(A)*P(B). Can you exlain how Bell got it right using an invalid assumption? 


#94
Mar1612, 11:49 PM

P: 1,583




#95
Mar1712, 05:04 AM

P: 3,181




#96
Mar1712, 05:17 AM

P: 3,181

PS: I think that Herbert's proof deserves to be a separate topic  it looks really good and no need for a lambda! 


#97
Mar1712, 10:17 PM

P: 1,583




#98
Mar2212, 05:36 AM

P: 3,181




Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
The JaynesCummings Hamiltonian  Quantum Physics  2  
Books detailing Bell's inequality derivation  Quantum Physics  3  
Statistical physics/mechanics book in the spirit of Jaynes  Science & Math Textbooks  0  
Socks. So many uncomfortable socks. What do you wear?  General Discussion  12  
E.T. Jaynes  General Physics  4 