Calculus: Solving Limits with Difference of Cubes Method

In summary, the conversation discussed different methods of solving the limit \lim_{x\rightarrow 0}\frac {\sqrt[3]{1+x^2} -1}{x^2}. The methods included L'Hospital's Rule, substitution, and taking a difference of cubes. The conversation also touched upon the derivative method but it was deemed too advanced for the level of the conversation. Ultimately, it was concluded that the limit is equal to 1/3 and this can be shown through various methods.
  • #1
a_ng116
13
0
1) [tex] \lim_{x\rightarrow 0}\frac {\sqrt[3]{1+x^2} -1}{x^2} [/tex]

I tried doing a difference of cubes to the top and I got: [tex] \frac{\sqrt[3]{1+x^2}-1 ((\sqrt[3]{1+x^2})^2 + \sqrt[3]{1+x^2} + 1)} {x^2} [/tex]

I know you need to get rid of the [tex] x^2 [/tex] on the bottom of the equation but now I'm stuck. Am I approaching this the right way and does anyone have any suggestions? Please and thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
a_ng116 said:
1) [tex] \lim_{x\rightarrow 0}\frac {\sqrt[3]{1+x^2} -1}{x^2} [/tex]
L'Hospital's Rule applies:

[tex] :(1): \ \ \ \ \lim_{x\rightarrow 0}\frac {\sqrt[3]{1+x^2} -1}{x^2} [/tex]

[tex] :(2): \ \ \ \ = \ \lim_{x\rightarrow 0}\frac {(1/3)(2x)(1+x^2)^{-2/3}} {2x} [/tex]

[tex] :(3): \ \ \ \ = \ \lim_{x\rightarrow 0} {(1/3)(1+x^2)^{-2/3}} [/tex]

[tex] :(4): \ \ \ \ = \ (1/3) [/tex]


~~
 
  • #3
you can use binomial expansion for

[tex]({1+x^2})^{\frac{1}{3}}[/tex]
 
  • #4
a_ng116 said:
1) [tex] \lim_{x\rightarrow 0}\frac {\sqrt[3]{1+x^2} -1}{x^2} [/tex]
Make the subsitution [itex]h = x^2[/itex].

[tex]\lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\frac {\sqrt[3]{1+h} -1}{h} [/tex]

Does the form of the limit remind you of something familiar?
Looks like the derivative of a function at some point...


Alternatively, you could use the sub: [itex]t=\sqrt[3]{1+x^2}[/itex]
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Galileo said:
Make the subsitution [itex]h = x^2[/itex].

[tex]\lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\frac {\sqrt[3]{1+h} -1}{h} [/tex]

Does the form of the limit remind you of something familiar?
Looks like the derivative of a function at some point...


Alternatively, you could use the sub: [itex]t=\sqrt[3]{1+x^2}[/itex]


I thought I got it but I didn't. [tex]\lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\frac {\sqrt[3]{1+h} -1}{h} [/tex] looks like is from the formula [tex]\lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\frac{f(a+h)-f(a)}{h} [/tex]. Or perhaps not? Could anyone give me another hint or suggestion involving the question using the method above,replacing [tex] x^2 [/tex] with [tex] h [/tex] please? Thank you very much.
 
  • #6
a_ng116 said:
I thought I got it but I didn't. [tex]\lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\frac {\sqrt[3]{1+h} -1}{h} [/tex] looks like is from the formula [tex]\lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\frac{f(a+h)-f(a)}{h} [/tex]. Or perhaps not? Could anyone give me another hint or suggestion involving the question using the method above,replacing [tex] x^2 [/tex] with [tex] h [/tex] please? Thank you very much.

You're on the right track. It does look a lot like that. Now what's f(x) and what's a? Note that [itex]f(a + h) = \sqrt[3]{1 + h} [/itex] and [itex] f(a) = 1[/itex].

--J
 
  • #7
So working backwards I got [tex] {\sqrt[3] {x} } [/tex] . Using the formula, replacing x with a [tex] 1+h [/tex] then: [tex] \frac {\sqrt[3] {1+h} - \sqrt[3] 1} {h} [/tex] which is [tex] \lim_{h\rightarrow 0}\frac {\sqrt[3]{1+h} -1}{h} [/tex]. Going back to [tex]\lim_{h\rightarrow 0}{\sqrt[3] {x} } [/tex] and replacing x with 0 gives you 0. I don't think I'm seeing it yet. Do you replace the [tex] {\sqrt[3] {x} } [/tex] back some point into the equation?
 
  • #8
Nope. You know that the limit is the derivative of the function evaluated at the point a. f(x) indeed equals x1/3. I think you'll agree with me in saying that calculating the derivative of x1/3 is pretty easy, yes? All you have to do is evaluate the derivative of it at a.

Have you figured out what a is?

--J
 
  • #9
could a be 1?
 
  • #10
Yes, a is 1.

I like Galileo's method, it shows insight.
 
  • #11
so using Galieo's method, do i replace x with 1 so [tex]\sqrt[3]1=1 [/tex] ?
 
  • #12
The method with the derivatives is interesting/ingenious,but the one using
[tex] A^{3}-B^{3}=(A-B)(A^{2}+AB+B^{3}) [/tex]

is simply elegant...

So the OP needs to redo calculations...

Daniel.
 
  • #13
The substitution [itex]t=\sqrt[3]{1+x^2}[/itex] is easiest I think.
The limit becomes:

[tex]\lim_{t\to 1}\frac{t-1}{t^3-1}[/tex]

De derivative method is cute and works sometimes, but usually a limit of this type shows up exactly when you want to calculate the derivative, so you cannot assume you know what the derivative of [itex]\sqrt[3]{x}[/itex] is.
The same is true for l'hospitals method.
 
  • #14
a_ng116 said:
so using Galieo's method, do i replace x with 1 so [tex]\sqrt[3]1=1 [/tex] ?

You need to differentiate f(x) before you set x to a. Remember that the equation is f'(x)|x=a equals the limit, not f(a).

--J
 
Last edited:
  • #15
It's more like:
[tex] f'(a)=f'(x)|_{x=a} [/tex] and NOT [tex] f'(a)=[f(a)]' (=0) [/tex]

Daniel.
 
  • #16
Yes, of course. Must spend more time composing posts.

--J
 
  • #17
Galileo said:
The substitution [itex]t=\sqrt[3]{1+x^2}[/itex] is easiest I think.
The limit becomes:

[tex]\lim_{t\to 1}\frac{t-1}{t^3-1}[/tex]

De derivative method is cute and works sometimes, but usually a limit of this type shows up exactly when you want to calculate the derivative, so you cannot assume you know what the derivative of [itex]\sqrt[3]{x}[/itex] is.
The same is true for l'hospitals method.


So by using this method, taking a difference of cubes on the bottom, the limit as t approaches 1 is [tex] \frac {1}{3} [/tex] which is the same answer as by using L'Hospital's Rule such as that in post #2. I'm sorry in advance for my stupidity but the bottom (which was originally [tex] x^2 [/tex] ) how did it become [tex] t^3-1 [/tex] ?
 
  • #18
i dunno... but can't u just rationalize this limit?

- Tu
 
  • #19
Solve for x2 in the equation [itex] t = \sqrt[3]{1+x^2} [/itex] and substitute it into the denominator.

--J
 
  • #20
a_ng116 said:
So by using this method, taking a difference of cubes on the bottom, the limit as t approaches 1 is [tex] \frac {1}{3} [/tex] which is the same answer as by using L'Hospital's Rule such as that in post #2. I'm sorry in advance for my stupidity but the bottom (which was originally [tex] x^2 [/tex] ) how did it become [tex] t^3-1 [/tex] ?
Since the answer is known anyway:

if [itex]t=\sqrt[3]{x^2+1}[/itex], then [itex]x^2=t^3-1[/itex].

For the derivative method.
After the substitution [itex]h=x^2[/itex] the limit becomes:
[tex]\lim_{h \to 0}\frac{\sqrt[3]{1+h}-1}{h}[/tex]

Now the derivative of [itex]\sqrt[3]{x}[/itex] at the point x=1 is:
[tex]\lim_{h \to 0}\frac{\sqrt[3]{1+h}-\sqrt[3]{1}}{h}[/tex]
which is exactly you limit.
So the limit is equal to the value of the derivative of [itex]\sqrt[3]{x}[/itex] at the point x=1. The derivative is: [itex]\frac{1}{3\sqrt[3]{x}^{2}}[/itex], so at x=1 it's 1/3.
(Seeing it as the derivative of [itex]\sqrt[3]{x+1}[/itex] in the point x=0 works too).
 
  • #21
I stumbled upon another way to solve this question without using the derivative method since according to my teacher, the derivative method is supposely too advanced for our level. Anyways, putting in a 1 in the bottom so it becomes:
[tex] \frac {\sqrt[3]{1+x^2} - 1}{(1+x^2)-1} [/tex]

and then taking a difference of cubes on the bottom it becomes:

[tex] \frac {\sqrt[3]{1+x^2} - 1}{(\sqrt[3]{1+x^2} -1)((\sqrt[3]{1+x^2})^2 + \sqrt[3]{1+x^2} + 1)} [/tex]

The top and bottom divide to give 1 and putting a 0 for x [tex] \frac{1}{(\sqrt[3]{1+x^2})^2 + \sqrt[3]{1+x^2} + 1)} [/tex] it gets you [tex] \frac {1}{3} [/tex] also.Apparently,this was the way my teacher wanted us to do it. Well, enough of my rambling. Thank you all for your patience and taking the time to assist me. Cheers.
 
  • #22
a_ng116 said:
I stumbled upon another way to solve this question without using the derivative method since according to my teacher, the derivative method is supposely too advanced for our level. Anyways, putting in a 1 in the bottom so it becomes:
[tex] \frac {\sqrt[3]{1+x^2} - 1}{(1+x^2)-1} [/tex]

and then taking a difference of cubes on the bottom it becomes:

[tex] \frac {\sqrt[3]{1+x^2} - 1}{(\sqrt[3]{1+x^2} -1)((\sqrt[3]{1+x^2})^2 + \sqrt[3]{1+x^2} + 1)} [/tex]

The top and bottom divide to give 1 and putting a 0 for x [tex] \frac{1}{(\sqrt[3]{1+x^2})^2 + \sqrt[3]{1+x^2} + 1)} [/tex] it gets you [tex] \frac {1}{3} [/tex] also.Apparently,this was the way my teacher wanted us to do it. Well, enough of my rambling. Thank you all for your patience and taking the time to assist me. Cheers.

This is exactly the same as substituting [itex]t=\sqrt[3]{1+x^2}[/itex], it's just easier to spot that: [itex](t^3-1)=(t-1)(t^2+t+1)[/itex]
instead of:
[tex](1+x^2)-1=(\sqrt[3]{1+x^2} -1)(\sqrt[3]{1+x^2})^2 + \sqrt[3]{1+x^2} + 1)[/tex]

[/end nonconstructive post]
 

What is the difference of cubes method in calculus?

The difference of cubes method is a technique used in calculus to solve limits involving cubic functions. It involves factoring the cubic function into the form (a-b)(a^2+ab+b^2) and then simplifying the expression to evaluate the limit.

When should the difference of cubes method be used to solve limits?

The difference of cubes method should be used when the limit involves a cubic function, as it allows for a simpler and more efficient way of evaluating the limit compared to other methods such as L'Hopital's rule.

How do you apply the difference of cubes method to solve limits?

To apply the difference of cubes method, the first step is to factor the cubic function into the form (a-b)(a^2+ab+b^2). Then, simplify the expression by canceling out common factors and substituting the limit value for the variable. Finally, evaluate the limit by plugging in the limit value for the remaining variable.

What are the common mistakes to avoid when using the difference of cubes method?

One common mistake when using the difference of cubes method is not factoring the cubic function correctly. It is important to double check the factoring to ensure that the expression is simplified and that no factors are missing. Another mistake is not substituting the limit value for the variable in the simplified expression, which can lead to incorrect answers.

Can the difference of cubes method be used for all cubic functions?

No, the difference of cubes method can only be used for cubic functions that can be factored into the form (a-b)(a^2+ab+b^2). If the cubic function cannot be factored in this form, then other methods must be used to solve the limit.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
28
Views
345
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
19
Views
658
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
539
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
25
Views
446
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
534
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
666
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
351
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
199
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
892
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
753
Back
Top