Cannon Ball Paradox: Math Explained

In summary: In any case, the friction in the real world will always affect the motion of the object, and will cause it to slow down.
  • #1
keode189
1
0
I understand that if you drop a cannonball from a hole drilled through the Earth from pole-to-pole, the ball would reach a speed of 18,000 mph at the center, and then slow to a speed of zero at the other end of the hole. Can anyone give me a mathematical explanation of this?

thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It's effectively just simple harmonic motion.

The only mass that affects the cannon ball is the mass INSIDE the sphere defined by its radius vector from the center of the earth. The matter outside its radius cancels. In other words, for a cannon ball that's a distance r from the center, the volume inside its radius vector is

[tex]V = \frac{4}{3} \pi r^3[/tex]

and given some density (which, for a simple approximation, does not depend on depth), the mass inside is

[tex]M = \frac{4}{3} \rho \pi r^3[/tex]

The gravitational force on the bowling ball from this mass is

[tex]F = G \frac{ \frac{4}{3} \rho \pi r^3 m }{r^2} = \frac{4}{3} G m \rho \pi r[/tex]

which is linear in r. The rest is just like any spring problem.

- Warren
 
Last edited:
  • #3
[Allow me to continue if I may . . .]


The period of this simple harmonic motion is

[tex]
T = 2 \pi \sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}
[/tex]

where

[tex]
k = \frac{4}{3} G m \rho \pi \mbox{.}[/tex]


Simplifying, we obtain

[tex]
T = 2 \pi \sqrt{\frac{m}{k}} = 2 \pi \sqrt{\frac{3 m}{4 G m \rho \pi }} = \sqrt{\frac{3 \pi}{G \rho }} \mbox{.}[/tex]


Taking

[tex]\rho = 5.51 \times 10^3 \ \mbox{kg/m}^3[/tex]

and

[tex]G = 6.67 \times 10^{-11} \ \mbox{N} \cdot \mbox{m}^2\mbox{/kg}^2[/tex]

we obtain

[tex]T = 5,050 \ \mbox{s} = 84.2 \ \mbox{min.}}[/tex]


For simple harmonic motion,

the maximum speed is [tex]\omega A[/tex]

where

[tex]\omega = \frac {2 \pi}{T}[/tex]

and

[tex]A = \mbox{the maximum displacement} \mbox{.}}[/tex]


Taking [tex]A = \mbox{the mean radius of the Earth} = 3,960 \ \mbox{mi}[/tex]

we find the maximum speed which occurs at the center of the Earth

[tex]\omega A = \frac {2 \pi}{T} A = \frac {2 \pi \ 3,960 \ \mbox{mi}} {5,050 \ \mbox{s}} = 17,737 \ \mbox{mi/h} \mbox{.}}[/tex]
 
  • #4
The last line of my previous post should have been

[tex]\omega A = \frac {2 \pi}{T} A = \frac {2 \pi \ 3,960 \ \mbox{mi}} {5,050 \ \mbox{s}} = 17,737 \ \mbox{mi/h} \mbox{.}} \simeq 18,000 \ \mbox{mph}.[/tex]

(Actually, I have a question. Should I use [tex]\approx[/tex] before 18,000 mph instead? What's the difference between signs [tex]\simeq[/tex] and [tex]\approx[/tex]?)
 
  • #5
A set of questions:

How is the atmosphere distributed around the Earth when a hole is dug through it?

Will the air be denser inside the hole?

The hole won't be vacuum, will it?
 
  • #6
Yes, the air will be denser in the hole, and densest right at the center of the earth.

If you want to calculate the pressure at any point in the hole, just consider the weight of the column of air above that point.

- Warren
 
  • #7
Originally posted by chroot
Yes, the air will be denser in the hole, and densest right at the center of the earth.


Then, the usual premise "neglecting friction" in this sort of a-tunnel-through-the-earth problems is unrealistic, isn't it?

Considering an object dropped into the tunnel will reach its terminal velocity, the object reaching a speed of 18,000 MPH at the center of the Earth and the motion having a period of 84 minutes are both impossible.
 
  • #8
Originally posted by Julian Solos
Then, the usual premise "neglecting friction" in this sort of a-tunnel-through-the-earth problems is unrealistic, isn't it?

Only slightly more unrealistc than it is in all the other hypathetical situations proposed in physics. For these kinds of situations, I find it helpfull to re[;ace the phrase "neglect air resistance" with, perform the experiment in a vacuum chamber". If the hole is dug through center of the Earth, and then all the air is pumped out, the model becomes sensible.
 

1. What is the Cannon Ball Paradox?

The Cannon Ball Paradox is a thought experiment that demonstrates the principles of Galilean relativity and the concept of relative motion. It involves two cannonballs being fired at the same time, one horizontally and one vertically, from the same height. The question arises: which cannonball will hit the ground first?

2. How does the Cannon Ball Paradox relate to math?

The Cannon Ball Paradox can be explained mathematically by using equations of motion, specifically the equations for projectile motion. By plugging in the initial velocities and heights of the cannonballs, we can determine the time it takes for each one to hit the ground and prove that they hit at the same time.

3. What are the key factors that affect the outcome of the Cannon Ball Paradox?

The key factors that affect the outcome of the Cannon Ball Paradox are the initial velocities and heights of the cannonballs, as well as the effects of gravity and air resistance. These variables can be manipulated to produce different results and demonstrate the principles of Galilean relativity.

4. How does the Cannon Ball Paradox challenge our understanding of motion?

The Cannon Ball Paradox challenges our understanding of motion by demonstrating that the laws of physics are the same for all observers, regardless of their relative motion. It also shows that the trajectory of an object is affected by both its horizontal and vertical velocities, rather than just its horizontal motion as we may intuitively think.

5. What real-world applications does the Cannon Ball Paradox have?

The principles demonstrated by the Cannon Ball Paradox have real-world applications in fields such as ballistics and aerospace engineering. By understanding the effects of gravity and air resistance on projectiles, we can accurately predict the trajectory of objects and design more efficient and effective systems for launching and propelling them.

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
337
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
630
Replies
45
Views
3K
Back
Top