Large Scale <-> Small Scale failure of intuition.

In summary, there is a connection between black holes and quantum effects, but it is a difficult problem to explain due to the singularity at the center of black holes. Superstring theory discusses the idea of extra dimensions, where one dimension grows as the other shrinks, which could potentially explain this connection. However, further research and understanding of quantum mechanics and general relativity is needed to fully comprehend this concept.
  • #1
cdux
188
0
If at very large scales of matter our intuitive logic fails to explain it (Black Holes) and at very small scales of matter untuition again fails (Quantum effects) then is there a connection between those two groups of phenomena?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
part of superstring theory talks about r and 1/r dimensions ie as one dimension gets larger the other gets smaller as in r and 1/r . So one would double in size and the other would 1/2 in size.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superstring_theory

see the extra dimensions section of the wiki article
 
  • #3
Part of the problem of explaining what goes on inside black holes is the fact that quantum theory and general relativity must be used together and they don't mesh.
 
  • #4
Now I wonder that since black holes create quantum considerations, why don't a small number of particles that just happen to be very condensed create general relativity sensitivities?
 
  • #5
cdux said:
Now I wonder that since black holes create quantum considerations, why don't a small number of particles that just happen to be very condensed create general relativity sensitivities?

To answer this, you'll have to study QM, GR... in depth and then begin to formulate a theory that can answer your question and still stay consistent with existing theories and experiments.
 
  • #6
cdux said:
Now I wonder that since black holes create quantum considerations, why don't a small number of particles that just happen to be very condensed create general relativity sensitivities?

In theory there are such things (mini black holes), but they have never been detected. Also, they would evaporate rapidly (depending on the mass).
 
  • #7
The only connection is that your intuition is built on experiences with objects of a certain range of sizes traveling with a certain range of velocities. The farther you get from this, the worse your intuition gets.
 
  • #8
mathman said:
In theory there are such things (mini black holes), but they have never been detected. Also, they would evaporate rapidly (depending on the mass).
Aha! Mini black holes might be the answer of a connection between Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity.
 
  • #9
cdux said:
Aha! Mini black holes might be the answer of a connection between Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity.

Black holes of any size present a problem between quantum theory and general relativity because of the singularity at their center, though mini black holes are considerably more 'quantum' affected.
 

1. What is "Large Scale <-> Small Scale failure of intuition"?

"Large Scale <-> Small Scale failure of intuition" refers to the phenomenon in which our intuition or common sense fails to accurately predict or understand the behavior of systems at different scales. This can occur when we try to apply our understanding of small scale systems to larger scale systems, or vice versa.

2. Why does this failure of intuition occur?

This failure of intuition occurs because our brains are not well-equipped to comprehend and visualize complex systems at different scales. Our intuition is based on our everyday experiences and does not always translate well to understanding complex systems.

3. How does this failure of intuition affect scientific research?

This failure of intuition can lead to incorrect assumptions and conclusions in scientific research. Scientists may make incorrect predictions or interpretations about the behavior of systems, which can hinder progress and lead to incorrect theories.

4. Can this failure of intuition be overcome?

While this failure of intuition cannot be completely eliminated, it can be mitigated through the use of mathematical models, simulations, and data analysis. By using these tools, scientists can better understand and predict the behavior of systems at different scales.

5. What are some real-world examples of this failure of intuition?

One example of this failure of intuition is the butterfly effect, where small changes in initial conditions can lead to drastically different outcomes in complex systems. Another example is the failure of economists to predict the 2008 financial crisis, as they did not fully understand the interconnectedness and complexity of the financial system at a large scale.

Similar threads

A Confusion of the scale of contact line dynamics and capillary flow
    • Mechanics
Replies
1
Views
1K
I Time travel is a fact or fiction.?
    • Other Physics Topics
Replies
9
Views
1K
I Low quantum numbers, high energy, and distance scales.
    • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
I Empirical temperature scales using different thermometers
    • Classical Physics
Replies
7
Views
830
B Thought Experiment: Does Gravity's Compression Warm an Object?
    • Classical Physics
Replies
1
Views
588
I Deur Gravitational self-interaction Doesn't Explain Galaxy Rotation Curves
    • Beyond the Standard Models
3
Replies
72
Views
5K
A Small and large extra dimension(s) of the physical space
    • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
1K
I Cosmic Flatness Deduced from CMB
    • Cosmology
Replies
4
Views
1K
B What is the important scale of things in the Universe?
    • Cosmology
Replies
11
Views
9K
B Is there a unity across scale in the universe?
    • Cosmology
Replies
6
Views
996

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top