Prove R[x]/(x^2)+a Isomorphic to Complex Numbers If a>0, RxR If a<0

  • Thread starter zcomputer5
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Rings
In summary, for a>0, multiplication in R[x]/(x^2+a) is isomorphic to complex numbers multiplication, while for a<0, it is isomorphic to multiplication in R^2. This can be proven by showing that the mapping f: R[x]/(x^2+a) -> C is an isomorphism, which preserves multiplication and is bijective.
  • #1
zcomputer5
2
0
Hello could someone help me out with this question

Show that R[x]/(x^2)+a isomorphic to the complex numbers if a>0 and RxR if a<0.


Here is an attempt! for mulitplication in R[x]/(x^2)+a

Elements of [itex]\mathbb{R}[X]/(X^2+a)[/itex] are cosets:



[itex]f(X) + (X^2+a)[/itex]. By the polynomial division algorithm [itex](X^2+a)g(X) + r(X) = f(X)[/itex] with r(X) degree 2, so we have elements:


[itex]mX + n + (X^2+a)[/itex] with addition ... and multiplication ...


[itex]Multiplication:[/itex]

[itex](n+mx +(x^{2}+a)(a+bx +(x^{2}+a)[/itex]

[itex]=na +nbx + n(x^{2}+a) + amx+ bmx^{2} + mx(x^{2}+a) + (x^{2}+a)^{2} + bx(x^{2}+a) +n(x^{2}+a[/itex]

[itex]=(na+mbx^{2})+(bn+am)x [/itex]

[itex]=(na-\alpha mb)+ (bn+am)x[/itex]

[itex]As we have x^{2}+a =0 which is the ideal[/itex]


Am I proceeding along the correct lines if I show this is isomorphic to the complex numbers number multiplication?

Clearly under Addition it is a bijection. For the mapping [itex]\mathbb{R}[X]/(X^2+a)[/itex] to complex numbers
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
, we define the homomorphism f : \mathbb{R}[X]/(X^2+a) -> C by: f(mX + n + (X^2+a)) = mx + n.For a>0, multiplication in \mathbb{R}[X]/(X^2+a) is isomorphic to complex numbers multiplication. For a<0, multiplication in \mathbb{R}[X]/(X^2+a) is isomorphic to multiplication in \mathbb{R}^{2}. To prove this, one can show that the mapping f is an isomorphism by showing that it is bijective and preserves multiplication. To show bijectivity, we note that the kernel of f consists of elements of the form k(X^2 + a) with k \in \mathbb{R}, which implies that every element in \mathbb{R}[X]/(X^2+a) has a unique representation as a coset of (X^2+a). To show that f preserves multiplication, we note that for two elements mX + n + (X^2+a) and aX + b + (X^2+a) in \mathbb{R}[X]/(X^2+a), their product is given by (mn - ab) + (bn + am)x + (X^2+a). Since f maps both elements to (mx + n) and (ax + b) respectively, the product of these two elements under f is given by (mn - ab) + (bn + am)x, which is the same as the product in \mathbb{R}[X]/(X^2+a). Hence, f is an isomorphism, and thus \mathbb{R}[X]/(X^2+a) is isomorphic to the complex numbers if a>0 and \mathbb{R}^2 if a<0.
 

What does it mean for R[x]/(x^2)+a to be isomorphic to the complex numbers?

Isomorphism is a mathematical concept that describes a one-to-one correspondence between two mathematical structures. In this case, it means that there exists a bijective mapping between the elements of R[x]/(x^2)+a and the complex numbers, which preserves their algebraic properties.

What is the significance of a being greater than or less than 0?

The value of a determines the structure of R[x]/(x^2)+a. If a is greater than 0, then the elements of R[x]/(x^2)+a are real numbers paired with a 0 imaginary component. If a is less than 0, then the elements are pairs of real numbers with a non-zero imaginary component.

How do you prove that R[x]/(x^2)+a is isomorphic to the complex numbers?

To prove isomorphism, you must show that there exists a bijective homomorphism between the two structures. This can be done by constructing a mapping between the elements of R[x]/(x^2)+a and the complex numbers, and then showing that this mapping preserves the algebraic properties of both structures.

What are some examples of elements in R[x]/(x^2)+a and their corresponding complex numbers?

If a=2, then the element x in R[x]/(x^2)+2 would correspond to the complex number 2i. Similarly, if a=-3, then the element 2x+1 in R[x]/(x^2)-3 would correspond to the complex number 1-3i.

Can R[x]/(x^2)+a be isomorphic to the complex numbers if a=0?

No, if a=0, then R[x]/(x^2)+a would simply be isomorphic to the real numbers, not the complex numbers. This is because the imaginary component of the complex numbers is zero, whereas in R[x]/(x^2)+a, the imaginary component would always be nonzero due to the presence of x.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
520
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
811
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
513
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
835
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
574
Back
Top