Positiontime equation from forceposition equationby Droctagonopus Tags: equation, forceposition, positiontime 

#1
Aug613, 03:44 AM

P: 28

I've been trying to obtain an equation of position in terms of time given force in terms of position. I've tried and I think I've managed to obtain an equation of velocity in terms of position using work and kinetic energy but I haven't managed the position time equation.
This is how I got velocity equation: A point mass [itex]m[/itex] is at starting position [itex]x=0[/itex] with starting velocity [itex]v_0[/itex] [itex]F=x+1[/itex] [itex]W=\int_0^x {(x+1)dx}=\frac{x^2+2x}2[/itex] [itex]\frac 1 2 m(v^2{v_0}^2)=\frac{x^2+2x}2[/itex] [itex]v=\sqrt{\frac{x^2+2x}m+{v_0}^2}[/itex] How do I get a positiontime equation? And how do I use a starting position other than x = 0? 



#2
Aug613, 04:16 AM

C. Spirit
Sci Advisor
Thanks
P: 4,941

Well just note that your equations are horribly dimensionally incorrect. But other than that, if you have ##\dot{x} = f(x)## then ##t = \int _{0}^{x} \frac{1}{f(x)}dx## and from there you just have to integrate (in principle) and invert the equation (in principle) to get ##x(t)## explicitly.




#3
Aug613, 04:20 AM

P: 28

Sorry I forgot to mention that I was working in one dimension. And what does the dot above the x signify?




#4
Aug613, 04:21 AM

C. Spirit
Sci Advisor
Thanks
P: 4,941

Positiontime equation from forceposition equation
When I said dimensionally incorrect I meant that your units are all wrong. The dot is a time derivative so ##v = \dot{x}##.




#5
Aug613, 04:28 AM

P: 28

By inverting the equation, do you mean getting an equation of x in terms of t?




#7
Aug613, 04:31 AM

P: 28

But does the velocity equation have to have a time variable in it? And also, is it possible to do this from an acceleration equation?




#8
Aug613, 04:33 AM

C. Spirit
Sci Advisor
Thanks
P: 4,941

No the velocity equation doesn't have to have a time variable. As I said, you have ##\frac{\mathrm{d} x}{\mathrm{d} t} = f(x)## hence you can solve for ##t(x)## just by solving the differential equation (in principle). You can then get ##x(t)## by inverting the equation (again in principle). I don't know what you mean by your second question; isn't that exactly what you did here? You started with the force as a function of position, which is also acceleration as a function of position, and you used the workenergy theorem to get an equation for the velocity in terms of position.




#9
Aug613, 04:36 AM

P: 28

I mean, is there was a way to do it without going through the process of obtaining a velocity equation?




#10
Aug613, 04:38 AM

C. Spirit
Sci Advisor
Thanks
P: 4,941

Well sure you could directly solve the second order linear differential equation in principle. The simplest example is the simple harmonic oscillator wherein you have ##\ddot{x} = f(x) = \omega^{2} x##. You can solve this analytically immediately and obtain ##x(t) = A\cos\omega t + B\sin\omega t##.



Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
solution of wave equation, 2nd partial derivatives of time/position  Classical Physics  1  
Coefficients for the equation of the position vs time equation  Introductory Physics Homework  1  
Determining the Position as a Function of Time Equation  Introductory Physics Homework  2  
position of an object in time and force  Introductory Physics Homework  5  
Position vs. Time graph equation  Introductory Physics Homework  1 