I, Robot (the book) Solar Energy Gathering anyone?

In summary, the author suggests that we create a stationary satellite that will collect solar energy and intensify it into a beam that is transmitted into a base on Earth. This would provide a 24/7 solar energy source, with much higher potential output than anything we can do to gather solar energy on Earth. There are some concerns about the feasibility of the concept, but overall it is an interesting idea.
  • #1
Emp-Naval
12
0
In the i,Robot book -by Issac Asimov- one of the stories mention some sort of satellite for gathering solar energy.

Basically this satellite will be stationary outside of our orbit, and it will gather solar energy and intensify it into a beam that is transmitted into a base on earth.

I think it's a brilliant idea/fictional idea, we could amount for Earth's rotation by putting some sort of "repeater satellites", you know like the routers, the main harvester sends the beam to the repeater most suitable to hit the base.

This will provide a 24/7 solar energy source, with much higher potential output -well, if we excluded the losses- than anything we can do to gather solar energy on earth.

Any problems with this model, other than the chance for things to go slightly off and incinerate Earth by mistake =p...
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Emp-Naval said:
Any problems with this model, other than the chance for things to go slightly off and incinerate Earth by mistake =p...

There is that, and the fact that dumping terawatts of extra energy into Earth's atmosphere will cause *something* to happen - exactly what is not clear. I suppose at some point, a really advanced civilization would have rendered the entire surface of their world artificial anyway...
 
  • #3
tfr000 said:
...I suppose at some point, a really advanced civilization would have rendered the entire surface of their world artificial anyway...

What exactly does that have to do with anything?
 
  • #4
The main issue here would be the beam of energy being blasted at the Earth. If the entire surface were artificial, we wouldn't have to worry about safety. Depending upon the method of transmission, imagine if this beam were to go astray just a little bit? Especially when the Earth is rotating.
 
  • #5
I don't mean to denigrate your idea but it has been discussed here before. Do a forum search. Basically, the consensus was that it is a useless idea because of the losses in power transmission to Earth, combined with the extreme danger of the concept.
 
  • #6
Emp-Naval said:
What exactly does that have to do with anything?
Well obviously if your entire world is engineered, then you have much less concern with things like trashing the environment - your environment is artificial.
Since our current world is not, and we are relatively dependent on the environment, it would behoove us not to trash it ignorantly.
 
  • #7
There is actually an enormous amount of work that has been done on this topic, even though it has fallen off the radar screen.
The incoming power beam is controlled through a phased array which relies on feedback from the ground to stay in phase. When something interferes with the feedback, such as an airplane flying into the beam, phasing is lost and the beam blooms rather than stay in focus.
NASA had some very pertinent seminars on this topic at their Glenn Research Lab in Ohio, with some of the proceedings published under the rubric of 'Radiant Energy Conversion from Space'.
The idea that we should just tap the sun directly rather than burning fossil or bio fuels seems pretty attractive.
The glitch is the space engineering involved is really difficult. Microwave power transmission is relatively the simplest, but mandates many square miles of receiver antennas. Optical systems are way more compact, but correspondingly more demanding to build. It is a generation long project to bring about, probably beyond the attention span of the modern societies.
 

1. What is the main idea behind "I, Robot"?

The main idea behind "I, Robot" is exploring the relationship between humans and intelligent machines and the potential consequences of advanced technology.

2. How does "I, Robot" relate to solar energy gathering?

"I, Robot" does not directly relate to solar energy gathering, but it does touch on the concept of renewable energy sources and the potential for robots to utilize them for power.

3. What is the significance of the three laws of robotics in "I, Robot"?

The three laws of robotics, created by author Isaac Asimov, play a crucial role in the book as they dictate the behavior and actions of the robots in the story. These laws are also used as a tool to explore the ethical implications of creating intelligent machines.

4. How does "I, Robot" compare to other works about robots and artificial intelligence?

"I, Robot" is considered a classic in the science fiction genre and is often compared to other works such as "Brave New World" and "Frankenstein" which also explore the consequences of scientific advancements and the relationship between humans and technology.

5. What is the overall message or lesson of "I, Robot"?

The overall message of "I, Robot" is that with great power comes great responsibility. The book serves as a warning against blindly pursuing technological advancements without considering the potential consequences and ethical implications. It also highlights the importance of maintaining control over advanced technology to prevent it from causing harm to humanity.

Similar threads

  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
21
Views
984
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
965
Back
Top