Slight preponderance of matter on antimatter

In summary, the cause of the slight preponderance of matter over antimatter at the beginning of times (big bang primordial soup) is still an open question. While there is experimental evidence of a slight difference between matter and antimatter reactions, known as C-P violation, it is not enough to fully explain the matter preponderance. Some suggest that the 2008 Nobel Prize was awarded for the "answer" to this question, but this is not entirely accurate. More research and theories are needed to fully understand baryogenesis.
  • #1
cosmicpencil
25
0
wats the cause of the slight preponderance of matter on antimatter at the beginning of times,(big bang primordial soup) any relevant theory or explications? thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Quantitatively it is an open question. Qualitatively there is experimental evidence that there is a slight difference (C-P violation) between matter and anti-matter reactions which give a hint as to what explains the matter preponderance.
 
Last edited:
  • #3


if one has answer to this question, then a Nobel Prize is awaiting for you ;-)
 
  • #5


malawi_glenn said:
if one has answer to this question, then a Nobel Prize is awaiting for you ;-)

some might even go so far as to claim that the 2008 Nobel Prize WAS awarded for the "answer" to this question. :wink:
 
  • #6


blechman said:
some might even go so far as to claim that the 2008 Nobel Prize WAS awarded for the "answer" to this question. :wink:

yeah but CP violation alone can not solve it.
 
  • #7


nor can the one CKM phase. i was just being obnoxious.

sorry.
 
  • #8


blechman said:
nor can the one CKM phase. i was just being obnoxious.

sorry.

It is not your fault that some people say that 2008 nobel prize solves baryogenesis :-)
 

1. What is "slight preponderance of matter on antimatter"?

The concept refers to the fact that there is more matter than antimatter in the observable universe. This is a fundamental asymmetry in the laws of physics and remains a significant unanswered question in science.

2. How do scientists know that there is a preponderance of matter over antimatter?

Scientists have observed the decay of particles containing both matter and antimatter and have found that there is a slight excess of matter particles left over. This has been confirmed through various experiments and observations.

3. Why is there more matter than antimatter in the universe?

This is still a mystery in science and is an active area of research. One theory is that in the early universe, there was an imbalance in the production of matter and antimatter, leading to the preponderance of matter we observe today.

4. What would happen if there was an equal amount of matter and antimatter in the universe?

If there was an equal amount of matter and antimatter, they would annihilate each other, resulting in the complete destruction of both and leaving behind only energy. This is known as the "Big Bang" theory of the origin of the universe.

5. Can we create equal amounts of matter and antimatter in a laboratory?

Yes, scientists have been able to create small amounts of antimatter in laboratories through particle accelerators. However, it is challenging to produce equal amounts of matter and antimatter due to their tendency to annihilate each other quickly.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
738
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
989
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
9
Views
4K
Back
Top