Strong versus weak interactions

In summary, the weak decay is the only process allowed energetically, and the reason it happens more is because it happens more.
  • #1
RedX
970
3
For the process where two neutral pions turn into two charged pions, I noticed that this can occur through both the strong and weak interactions. Through the strong interaction it is a 4-pion vertex, and through the weak interaction it involves a virtual W-particle. If I were asked on a quiz what force is responsible for two neutral pions turning into two charged pions, would the answer be strong force, because the coefficient is proportional to 1/(100 MeV)^2, as opposed to 1/(80 GeV)^2 for the weak force?

Similarly, I noticed processes where a nucleon can change into another nucleon can occur through both the strong and weak interactions, with intermediary particles being either a charged pion or W-particle, respectively. So which interaction would I say is responsible for a change in the nucleon?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
That which is the most probable, i.e., via the strong coupling mechanism. Just make sure that the process is not forbidden due to some conservation laws.
 
  • #3
Bob_for_short said:
That which is the most probable, i.e., via the strong coupling mechanism. Just make sure that the process is not forbidden due to some conservation laws.

I have a question that is kinda of related. Take the process where a neutron turns into a proton. This can be done via the weak interaction, where there is also an electron and antineutrino that flies out. Or it can be done via the strong interaction, where the negative pion flies out.

The weak decay seems to have a very small chance, proportional to Fermi's constant. The strong decay seems to be much more probable according to the Goldberger-Treiman relation. In fact, the strong decay seems to be so ridiculously more probable than the weak decay, that there shouldn't even be talk of weak decay!

Am I correct in saying that the reason the weak decay (beta decay) is talked more about is because it happens more? And would the reason that it happens more be related to statistical mechanics, since quantum mechanics seems to favor the strong decay? The pion is a lot heavier than the neutrino and electron, so energetically does beta decay happen as opposed to pion decay because of statistical mechanics rather than quantum mechanics?
 
  • #4
RedX said:
Am I correct in saying that the reason the weak decay (beta decay) is talked more about is because it happens more?
Yes, the weak decay is, in fact, the only process allowed energetically.
And would the reason that it happens more be related to statistical mechanics, since quantum mechanics seems to favor the strong decay? The pion is a lot heavier than the neutrino and electron, so energetically does beta decay happen as opposed to pion decay because of statistical mechanics rather than quantum mechanics?
No, as soon as the sum (pion mass + proton mass) exceeds the neutron (i.e., initial) mass the strong decay is forbidden by the energy conservation law. It may happen if there is a projectile of sufficient energy and there are no other conservation laws to obey, for example barion, lepton numbers to be conserved, etc.
 
  • #5
Ah, got it. I forgot about energy conservation. I thought the pion was pretty much massless, because that is part of how the chiral Lagrangian is derived, the pion as a pseudo-goldstone boson resulting from broken SU(2) axial flavor symmetry breaking in the quark condensate. But it achieves some mass when you give the u and d quarks mass, through the Gell-Mann-Oakes-Renner relation. Evidently, this mass, although it is said to be small, is still much larger than the mass difference between the proton and the neutron, which are really close in mass.

So it looks like it'll be beneficial to memorize some masses.
 

What are strong and weak interactions?

Strong and weak interactions are two of the four fundamental forces in the universe, along with gravity and electromagnetism. Strong interactions are responsible for binding quarks together to form protons and neutrons, while weak interactions are responsible for radioactive decay.

How do strong and weak interactions differ?

The main difference between strong and weak interactions is their strength. Strong interactions are much stronger than weak interactions, with a strength that is about 100 times greater. Additionally, strong interactions only act on particles with color charge, such as quarks, while weak interactions act on all particles.

What are some examples of strong and weak interactions?

An example of a strong interaction is the binding of quarks to form protons and neutrons. An example of a weak interaction is the decay of a neutron into a proton, electron, and antineutrino. Another example is beta decay, where a neutron decays into a proton, electron, and electron antineutrino.

How do strong and weak interactions contribute to nuclear stability?

Strong interactions play a crucial role in keeping the nucleus together by binding the protons and neutrons together. Without strong interactions, the repulsive force between positively charged protons would cause the nucleus to break apart. Weak interactions, on the other hand, contribute to nuclear stability by allowing for the conversion of one type of particle into another, such as the conversion of a neutron into a proton through beta decay.

Can strong and weak interactions be manipulated or controlled?

While strong and weak interactions cannot be directly manipulated or controlled, scientists have learned to harness these forces in various ways. For example, nuclear power plants use the process of nuclear fission, which involves manipulating strong and weak interactions, to generate electricity. Additionally, scientists continue to study and understand these interactions in hopes of finding new ways to harness them for practical applications.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
829
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
17
Views
2K
Back
Top