Do GPS Clocks Really Run Slower Than Earth Clocks Due to Time Dilation?

In summary, the effect of moving clocks running slower in an Inertial Reference Frame does not apply in the case of GPS satellites due to their non-inertial situation. However, taking into account the effects of both gravity and relative velocity, the clocks on GPS satellites actually run faster than clocks on the ground. This is accounted for through precalibration and subsequent adjustments to keep the clocks in sync.
  • #1
exmarine
241
11
I had such success with all your answers to my last SRT question here I’ll try another. The LT seems very symmetric. To the observers in each frame, the other’s clocks appear slower, etc. Is that true for out GPS satellites? If we ignore the GRT effect of speeding up their clocks, I think it is agreed that the SRT effect makes their clocks “appear” (?) slower. Don’t their clocks have to really be slower than ours? Do our ground-based clocks appear slower to them – say to an astronaut circling the globe? Thanks in advance for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
No, the symmetric effect of moving clocks running slower in an Inertial Reference Frame doesn't apply in non-inertial situations. So, neglecting the effects of gravity, a clock moving in a circle in an IRF will run slower than a clock stationary in that IRF but since there is no IRF in which the circling clock is always at rest, it cannot say that the other clock is running slower than it is.

In fact, this is the very scenario that Einstein predicted in his 1905 paper introducing Special Relativity at the end of section 4.
 
  • #3
exmarine said:
I had such success with all your answers to my last SRT question here I’ll try another. The LT seems very symmetric. To the observers in each frame, the other’s clocks appear slower, etc. Is that true for out GPS satellites? If we ignore the GRT effect of speeding up their clocks, I think it is agreed that the SRT effect makes their clocks “appear” (?) slower. Don’t their clocks have to really be slower than ours? Do our ground-based clocks appear slower to them – say to an astronaut circling the globe? Thanks in advance for any help.

The clocks on GPS satellites will tick slower than earthbound clocks if we ignore the fact that they are situated not so deep in the Earth's gravitational field which makes them tick faster, that is correct.

The clocks on board a train going east will tick slower than the clocks on board a train going west, due to the rotation of the earth.

In general if you want to know the rate of time of a moving clock in a near-earth environment you will have to know how fast it is moving in reference to a non-spinning Earth and the gravitational potential at its location.
 
  • #4
Agerhell said:
The clocks on GPS satellites will tick slower than earthbound clocks if we ignore the fact that they are situated not so deep in the Earth's gravitational field which makes them tick faster

But, just to be clear, if you take the difference in gravitational potential into account at the altitude of the GPS satellites, it more than offsets the effect of relative velocity; the net effect is that clocks on GPS satellites tick *faster* than clocks at rest on the ground. (The timing signals that come from the GPS satellites are corrected for this.)
 
  • #5
Yes, the GPS clocks 'tick' faster than those on Earth due lower gravity [GR effect], which is partially offset by their orbital velocity [SR effect]. The net effect is they would run about 39,000 nanoseconds per day faster than their earthbound counterparts. GPS clocks are precalibrated before launch to cause them to run this much slower, and, voila! Once in orbit they are synchronized with ground clocks. Scientists subsequently tweak the calibration of the GPS clocks to keep them in synch with ground clocks.
 

1. How does time dilation affect GPS clocks?

Time dilation refers to the phenomenon where time moves slower for objects that are moving at very high speeds. In the case of GPS satellites, which are constantly orbiting the Earth at high speeds, time dilation causes their onboard clocks to run slightly slower compared to clocks on Earth. This effect must be taken into account in order for the GPS system to accurately determine locations on Earth.

2. What is the difference between special and general relativity in relation to GPS clocks?

Special relativity explains the effects of time dilation on objects moving at high speeds, while general relativity explains the effects of gravity on time. In the case of GPS clocks, both theories are relevant as the satellites are affected by both high speeds and the Earth's gravitational pull. Special relativity predicts the time dilation effect, while general relativity accounts for the slight difference in time due to the lower gravitational pull on the satellites compared to Earth's surface.

3. How much does time dilation affect GPS clocks?

The time dilation effect on GPS clocks is very small, with a difference of about 38 microseconds per day. This may seem insignificant, but it can result in errors of up to 10 kilometers in location calculations if not accounted for. Therefore, precise adjustments must be made to account for this effect in order for the GPS system to function accurately.

4. Can time dilation be observed in everyday life?

Yes, time dilation can be observed in everyday life, although the effects are very small and not easily noticeable. For example, atomic clocks on airplanes that travel at high speeds have been found to run slightly slower compared to atomic clocks on the ground. However, the difference is so small that it is only measurable with highly precise equipment.

5. Is time dilation the only factor that affects GPS clocks?

No, time dilation is not the only factor that affects GPS clocks. Other factors such as the Earth's gravitational pull, the satellites' altitude, and atmospheric effects also play a role in the accuracy of GPS clocks. Therefore, a combination of factors must be taken into account in order to ensure the precise functioning of the GPS system.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
16
Views
648
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
215
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
70
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
14
Views
965
  • Special and General Relativity
4
Replies
115
Views
5K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
83
Views
4K
Back
Top