New Reply

Gauging non-compact lie groups

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Aug20-12, 02:45 AM   #1
 

Gauging non-compact lie groups


I know that gauging a lie-goup with a kinetic term of the form:

\begin{equation}
\Tr{F^{\mu \nu} F_{\mu \nu} }
\end{equation}

Is not allowed for a non-compact lie group because it does not lead to a positive definite Hamiltonian. I was wondering if anyone knew of a general way to gauge non-compac lie groups. I know there must be a way since the Lorentz group can be gauged to give the Einstein Hilbert action.
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
physics news on PhysOrg.com

>> The better to see you with: Scientists build record-setting metamaterial flat lens
>> New analysis yields improvements in a classic 3D imaging technique
>> Research effort deep underground could sort out cosmic-scale mysteries
Aug21-12, 01:16 PM   #2
 
I have been reading a little about this and it seems that people can gauge non-compact lie groups with a kinetic term of the form:

\begin{equation}
Q_{\alpha \beta} F^{\alpha}_{\mu \nu} F^{\beta}_{\eta \rho} \epsilon^{\mu \nu \eta \rho}
\end{equation}

with a specific choice of constant matrix Q. My question now is, 1) what mathematically motivates the choice above and 2) what conditions on the matrix Q is there to obtain a non-topological term *and* a positive definite hamiltonian?
New Reply

Tags
field theory, gauge, lie algebra, non-compact, sugra
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Gauging non-compact lie groups
Thread Forum Replies
Is the choice axiom used here? (proof that product of two compact spaces is compact) Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 2
Gauging the (A)dS algebra Beyond the Standard Model 2
Gauging Discrete Groups. Beyond the Standard Model 13
compact-valued range doesnot imply compact graph Calculus 3
Geometry with non-compact groups, e.g. Freidel/Livine Differential Geometry 0