| New Reply |
Gauging non-compact lie groups |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Aug20-12, 02:45 AM | #1 |
|
|
Gauging non-compact lie groups
I know that gauging a lie-goup with a kinetic term of the form:
\begin{equation} \Tr{F^{\mu \nu} F_{\mu \nu} } \end{equation} Is not allowed for a non-compact lie group because it does not lead to a positive definite Hamiltonian. I was wondering if anyone knew of a general way to gauge non-compac lie groups. I know there must be a way since the Lorentz group can be gauged to give the Einstein Hilbert action. |
| Aug21-12, 01:16 PM | #2 |
|
|
I have been reading a little about this and it seems that people can gauge non-compact lie groups with a kinetic term of the form:
\begin{equation} Q_{\alpha \beta} F^{\alpha}_{\mu \nu} F^{\beta}_{\eta \rho} \epsilon^{\mu \nu \eta \rho} \end{equation} with a specific choice of constant matrix Q. My question now is, 1) what mathematically motivates the choice above and 2) what conditions on the matrix Q is there to obtain a non-topological term *and* a positive definite hamiltonian? |
| New Reply |
| Tags |
| field theory, gauge, lie algebra, non-compact, sugra |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Gauging non-compact lie groups
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Is the choice axiom used here? (proof that product of two compact spaces is compact) | Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics | 2 | ||
| Gauging the (A)dS algebra | Beyond the Standard Model | 2 | ||
| Gauging Discrete Groups. | Beyond the Standard Model | 13 | ||
| compact-valued range doesnot imply compact graph | Calculus | 3 | ||
| Geometry with non-compact groups, e.g. Freidel/Livine | Differential Geometry | 0 | ||