Differential amplifier with zener diodes

In summary, In the first example, using the first method to calculate voltage out (Vout = 4V), the student had a problem with R4 and got the wrong answer. However, when changing the potential divider to 5k and 5k in series and applying the formula, they got the correct answer.
  • #36
Femme_physics said:
How do I know it without calculating?


Perhaps you can apply this:
I like Serena said:
Just apply the following rules:

1. Treat the op-amp as if its inputs + and - are not connected to the circuit.
That is, they draw no current in KCL, and they are not part of any loop in KVL.

2. Set V+=V- and solve using KCL and KVL, unless you find it's impossible, or if Vout would come outside its bounds.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
Femme_physics said:
How do I know it without calculating?

Usually it is something that is proven in class, and is then used as a rule of thumb for op-amps with feedback from then on.

Do you wish to go through the analysis to show that V- will be driven to be equal to V+?
 
  • #38
Perhaps you can apply this:
Usually it is something that is proven in class, and is then used as a rule of thumb for op-amps with feedback from then on.

Fair enough, so for every non-comparator V- = V+ ?

Do you wish to go through the analysis to show that V- will be driven to be equal to V+?

I'm tempted to say yes, but I bet it'll be more complex than I think it is.
AT ANY RATE.
http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/3663/thehell.jpg

I'm still having issues. As you can see, my I4 turned up in the minus. And I get my Vout to be 3.8 [V]. Is that right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #39
Femme_physics said:
Fair enough, so for every non-comparator V- = V+ ?
Well, any op-amp circuit with a feedback path from Vout to V-.
I'm still having issues. As you can see, my I4 turned up in the minus. And I get my Vout to be 3.8 [V]. Is that right?

If you keep a few more decimal places in you values of V+ and V- you should be good (the amplification factor for the circuit due to R1 and R2 makes it sensitive to small differences, so keep a few more decimal places in intermediate results).
 
  • #40
Is this question still trying to calculate Vout for the circuit posted at the start or has it become something else??
V at + input = 6.66V (potential divider)
V at - input = 6.66V
V across R into - input = 8 - 6.66 = 1.34
Current through Rin = 1.34/5k current through Rf = 1.34/5k
Voltage across Rf = 10k x 1.34/5k = 2 .68 V
Therefore Vout = 6.66 - 2.68 = 4.00V
This is the way to calculate Vout !
 
  • #41
Is this question still trying to calculate Vout for the circuit posted at the start or has it become something else??
V at + input = 6.66V (potential divider)
V at - input = 6.66V
V across R into - input = 8 - 6.66 = 1.34
Current through Rin = 1.34/5k current through Rf = 1.34/5k
Voltage across Rf = 10k x 1.34/5k = 2 .68 V
Therefore Vout = 6.66 - 2.68 = 4.00V
This is the way to calculate Vout !

Thanks but I'm trying to verify it using KVL and KCL alone.

If you keep a few more decimal places in you values of V+ and V- you should be good (the amplification factor for the circuit due to R1 and R2 makes it sensitive to small differences, so keep a few more decimal places in intermediate results).
But no matter how many numbers I keep after the decimal point the result of I4 will still turn out minus. Did I do something wrong?
 
  • #42
Femme_physics said:
But no matter how many numbers I keep after the decimal point the result of I4 will still turn out minus. Did I do something wrong?

No, nothing wrong :smile: It just means that Vout is less positive than V-. And as you found out, V- is about 6.667V and Vout about 4.0V. So all's good.
 
  • #43
Sorry FP... I had forgotten that your emphasis was on KVL etc..
 
  • #44
Technician, outside the realm of KVL and KCL I have no problem to accept your method but I learned two formulas for differential amplifier which seems to result in Vout = 0

Them being

Vout = A (V1 - V2)
A = Rf/R1Are they false? Or am I misusing it? (I used it in my original post)
 
  • #45
Femme_physics said:
Technician, outside the realm of KVL and KCL I have no problem to accept your method but I learned two formulas for differential amplifier which seems to result in Vout = 0

Them being

Vout = A (V1 - V2)
A = Rf/R1


Are they false? Or am I misusing it? (I used it in my original post)

Careful there, FP. Don't mix up the open-loop gain of the op-amp (A) with the closed-loop gain of a circuit with feedback resistor Rf. Open loop gains for modern op-amp chips are typically on the order of 106. Closed loop gains for a single stage are generally kept less than about 1000 for reasons of circuit stability. More typical are stage gains of about 10 to 100. If more amplification is required, stages are cascaded.

When multiplicative values like a million show up in the equations of circuits it is often akin to dealing with ratios of large numbers in mathematics (limits), where the result as A → ∞ is often some nice finite number with practical application (i.e. a rule of thumb).

For circuits with feedback from Vout to V- we use the rule of thumb that V- = V+ because it can be shown that the large value of A (the open-loop gain of the op-amp), will force them to be very, very close in value, usually closer than measurement error or component tolerances would let you see. If you need convincing on this point we can go through the mathematical demonstration.

While it is certainly possible to analyze every circuit from scratch with KVL, KCL, and so on, it is generally expedient to use the rule of thumb where applicable.
 
  • #46
FP... from outside the realms of KVL and KCL..!
I have attached another circuit diagram with the hope of impressing upon you the close link between Vin, Rin, Rf and Vout and especially the importance of the -input:smile:
You are perfectly correct to write A = Rf/Rin. (should be -Rf/Rin...inverting amplifier)
BUT you must be sure that this means the V across Rf = A x the V across Rin.
The -input can be seen as a pivot on a lever. Push Vin down and Vout goes up by a magnified amount (magnification = -Rf/Rin)
The battery or voltage at the + input 'lifts' the pivot (by 2V in my diagram)...
So Vout = -A x (V1 - V2) + V2 ... it is easy to forget to add V2 !
As an example if A = 2 and Vin = +5V then Vout = -2 x (5-2) + 2 = -4V
If Vin = +4V then Vout = -2 x (4-2) +2 = -2V
If Vin = -4V then Vout = -2 x (-4 -2) +2 = +14V (if supply voltage allows)
and so on.
If V2 = 0 ... it usually does ... then you have the straight forward equation:
Vout/Vin = - Rf/Rin The -sign indicates an inverting amplifier.
Hope this does not make life more confusing for you :wink:
 

Attachments

  • amp3.jpg
    amp3.jpg
    41.6 KB · Views: 336
  • #47
Careful there, FP. Don't mix up the open-loop gain of the op-amp (A) with the closed-loop gain of a circuit with feedback resistor Rf.

Well, they both appear like the same type of loop...I think that would be "open".

http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/149/votn.jpg

You are perfectly correct to write A = Rf/Rin. (should be -Rf/Rin...inverting amplifier)

My circuit is inverting? It's "differential op-amp", neither non-inverting or inverting.I admit I'm a bit confused, but I'll take it step by step. At least I made my final scan.

http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/9074/haiim.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #48
The open loop gain of an op-amp refers to the intrinsic gain of the amplifier without feedback to limit it:
attachment.php?attachmentid=42173&stc=1&d=1324675737.gif


The output voltage is then Vout = A(V1 - V2). A can be very high, almost always greater than 105, and typically closer to 106. The actual gain from chip to chip, even in the same batch of chips can vary quite a bit. But it's so large that it usually doesn't matter since op-amps are rarely used open-loop fashion, except as comparators.

When the op-amp is embedded in a circuit with feedback (thus "closing the loop"), the gain of the circuit is "restrained" by the feedback and is much more manageable and can be set precisely by the circuit components in the bias network. Hence your Rf/R1 formula.
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    1.4 KB · Views: 507
  • #49
I'd like to emphasize the distinction between open-loop-amplification and feedback-amplification.
##V_{out}=A_{OL}(V_+ - V_-)## if there is no connection between ##V_{out}## and the inputs of the op-amp. ##A_{OL} \approx 10^6##.
In a differential amplifier configuration, you have:
##V_{out}=A_f(V_2 - V_1)## since there is a connection between ##V_{out}## and the inputs of the op-amp (aka feedback). ##A_f = {R_f \over R_1}##.
Note that ##V_+ = V_-## in this case.
 
  • #50
FP
You have written
Vout = A(V2 - V1). Where A = Rf/Rin
This calculates the voltage across Rf !
To get Vout you must add on V+...You did this in your last analysis with the Zener diodes.

Vout = A(V2 - V1) + (V+)
Best wishes
 
Last edited:
  • #51
Ah...so basically those formulas I wrote don't apply since this is a closed loop gain, yes? Gotcha.Technician, can you write me the formulas you applied to solve it? I don't appear to have them written. Thanks a bunch, you're a world of help :smile:
I'd like to emphasize the distinction between open-loop-amplification and feedback-amplification.
The output voltage is then Vout = A(V1 - V2). A can be very high, almost always greater than 105, and typically closer to 106. The actual gain from chip to chip, even in the same batch of chips can vary quite a bit. But it's so large that it usually doesn't matter since op-amps are rarely used open-loop fashion, except as comparators.

Why not? What's the practical difference/advantage of closed loop to open loop?
 
  • #52
I think I have misread the various Vs... I will go through again
 
  • #53
technician said:
I think I have misread the various Vs... I will go through again

What do you mean? I got the correct solution by copying your text, but I'm unsure what formulas you've used. I'm just trying to reverse-engineer the logic :smile:
 
  • #54
FP
everything is OK The Vout for the differential amplifier is = A(V1-V2) when the ratios of Rf/Rin and R2/R1 are equal.
In my last post I should delete that you must add on V+...that works its way through with the equal ratios. I will go back and edit that post so there is no confusion.
If the ratios are not the same then you cannot use the simplified formula
Vout = A(V1 - V2)
 
  • #55
Then it's all sorted out. Thanks , everyone! :smile:
 
  • #56
Femme_physics said:
The output voltage is then Vout = A(V1 - V2). A can be very high, almost always greater than 105, and typically closer to 106. The actual gain from chip to chip, even in the same batch of chips can vary quite a bit. But it's so large that it usually doesn't matter since op-amps are rarely used open-loop fashion, except as comparators.
Why not? What's the practical difference/advantage of closed loop to open loop?

Well, as I stated in the next paragraph the greatest advantage is precise control over the circuit gain and thus the circuit's behavior. Imagine how difficult it would be to manufacture something if no two circuits behaved exactly the same way because the gain of the components could not be controlled. You'd probably have to reject half the products that come off the assembly line.

Another reason to "close the loop" is that you can do some clever things by putting more than just resistances in the feedback path. Some powerful filters can be made by placing reactive components (capacitors, inductors) in the loop. You may cover this in your course. It's also possible to make circuits that take square roots or logs of the applied voltage! The op-amp with feedback is the building block of analog computing.
 

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
14
Views
793
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Electrical Engineering
2
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
3
Views
630
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top