Might inflationary multiverses bumping cause anisotropy?

  • Thread starter DrZforLife
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Cause
In summary: Most of the spots are from "tiny" quantum fluctuations being stretched out to a cosmic scale. It's not quite as if the CMB is a "picture" of the universe at the time of the collision. There is a picture there but it is modified by all sorts of other things. In summary, the conversation discusses the possibility of two inflationary universes colliding and the potential effects this could have on the anisotropy seen in the Cosmic background radiation and galaxy formation. While there is some speculation and discussion about the plausibility of such an event and its measurable signature, current research and observations have not confirmed the existence of such a collision.
  • #1
DrZforLife
15
0
Could two Inflationary universes bumping up against one another result in the anisotropy seen in the Cosmic background radiation and thus ultimately lead to galaxy formation? And could the signature for such an event be measured?
It seems two "big bang" universes arising near one another might gently interact before the space between them expands fast enough to separate them. Could this, hopefully gentle, interaction be responsible for the eventual aggregation of matter into stars? If so, such a local interaction like two balloons bumping should leave some measurable "fingerprint" in both.

Eagerly awaiting enlightenment,

DrZ
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
From a totally speculative premise, you can make any conclusion that you like. No one can prove you wrong.
 
  • #3
Would not such an encounter leave a trace that would fit with a mathematical model consistent with cosmological models? And could such an interaction not be seen in the CMBR? New observations are so sensitive it seems any predicted ripples or perterbations might be seen.
 
  • #4
DrZforLife said:
Would not such an encounter leave a trace that would fit with a mathematical model consistent with cosmological models? And could such an interaction not be seen in the CMBR? New observations are so sensitive it seems any predicted ripples or perterbations might be seen.

A guy named Matthew Johnson from the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics recently came to give a talk about this in my department. The short answer seems to be, "yes, people think that bubble collisions would leave observational signatures in the CMB." Some searching revealed that this was probably the paper he made reference to in his talk:

http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.1995

and also this, its companion:

http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.3667

For the sake of clarity, he's talking about eternal inflation, a scenario in which our observable universe is a sort of non-inflating "pocket universe" or "bubble" that has separated out of an eternally inflating background, and the theory predicts that many such bubbles or "pocket universes" would exist, each perhaps with different physical constants of nature.

phinds said:
From a totally speculative premise, you can make any conclusion that you like. No one can prove you wrong.

Skepticism is always good, but it turns out the OP was not totally out to lunch here. :wink:
 
Last edited:
  • #5
DrZforLife said:
Could two Inflationary universes bumping up against one another result in the anisotropy seen in the Cosmic background radiation

Two inflationary universes bumping against either other would result in anisotropy, but not the anisotropy we see. If you have only two universes, then you'd see massive directional differences which is something we *don't* see.

Thus ultimately lead to galaxy formation?

Nope. Inflation happens a millions of years before galaxy formation. By the time galaxies form, then the universe has settled down. Now you could see a signature in the distribution of galaxies, but this would be some large directional component that we don't see.

Also galaxy formation is a huge unknown, but by the time it happens, the universe is cool enough so that there is little room for "weird physics."

And could the signature for such an event be measured?

Yes it could. We haven't seen it so, there are limits on what can happen.

It seems two "big bang" universes arising near one another might gently interact before the space between them expands fast enough to separate them.

Two universe colliding wouldn't be gentle.

Could this, hopefully gentle, interaction be responsible for the eventual aggregation of matter into stars?

No it couldn't. When stars form, we are in "non-weird" physics at which point, we can rule out weird things happening like colliding universes. (Also, colliding *galaxies* are important in star formation).

If so, such a local interaction like two balloons bumping should leave some measurable "fingerprint" in both.

Yes. And we don't see it (people have looked).

Also you mention two balloons. If you have a large number of balloons things are different...
 
  • #6
DrZforLife said:
Could two Inflationary universes bumping up against one another result in the anisotropy seen in the Cosmic background radiation and thus ultimately lead to galaxy formation? And could the signature for such an event be measured?
It seems two "big bang" universes arising near one another might gently interact before the space between them expands fast enough to separate them. Could this, hopefully gentle, interaction be responsible for the eventual aggregation of matter into stars? If so, such a local interaction like two balloons bumping should leave some measurable "fingerprint" in both.

Eagerly awaiting enlightenment,

DrZ
The interaction isn't quite so gentle, but yes, it would leave a distinct signature on the CMB if it happened late enough in inflation. Basically, such collisions produce ring-like patterns on the CMB. Some statistical tests of WMAP data show that maybe there is such a pattern, but the detection isn't strong enough to say for sure:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.3667

Edit: Oh, and by the way, it is certainly the case that most of the fluctuations we see on the CMB are not due to any sort of collision.
 

1. What is an inflationary multiverse?

An inflationary multiverse is a theoretical concept in cosmology that suggests our universe is just one of many universes that exist within a larger multiverse. It is based on the idea that the universe underwent a period of rapid expansion (known as inflation) in its early stages, resulting in the creation of multiple universes.

2. How does inflationary multiverse theory explain anisotropy?

Inflationary multiverse theory proposes that during the rapid expansion of the universe, different regions underwent inflation at different rates, resulting in variations in the density of matter. This uneven distribution of matter is thought to be responsible for the anisotropy (unevenness) observed in our universe.

3. What is the relationship between inflationary multiverses and the Big Bang Theory?

Inflationary multiverse theory is closely related to the Big Bang Theory, as it suggests that our universe began with a rapid period of expansion. However, the Big Bang Theory focuses on the origins of our specific universe, while inflationary multiverse theory suggests that our universe is just one of many that were created during this expansion.

4. How can we test the hypothesis of inflationary multiverses causing anisotropy?

Currently, there is no direct way to test the hypothesis of inflationary multiverses causing anisotropy. However, scientists are working on developing new technology and techniques that may one day be able to detect evidence of other universes within the multiverse.

5. Are there any alternative explanations for anisotropy that do not involve inflationary multiverses?

Yes, there are alternative theories that attempt to explain anisotropy without involving inflationary multiverses. Some propose that the uneven distribution of matter may be due to the influence of dark matter or the effects of cosmic strings. However, these theories are still speculative and have not been widely accepted by the scientific community.

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
3
Views
388
  • Cosmology
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
4
Views
5K
Back
Top