Why does the Schwinger parameter correspond to proper length?

by Dilatino
Tags: correspond, length, parameter, propagaor, proper, quantum field theory, schwinger
Dilatino is offline
Dec21-13, 03:30 PM
P: 5
I have just learned from nice article


that the propagator of a massive particle can be rewritten as an integral over the so-called Schwinger parameter t as

\frac{1}{p^2 + m^2} = \int\limits_0^\infty dt \exp(-t(p^2 + m^2))

In addition, in the blog article it is said that this Schwinger parameter p can be interpreted as the proper length of the propagator. I dont see this, so can somebody give a derivation/further explanation?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
A 'quantum leap' in encryption technology
Using antineutrinos to monitor nuclear reactors
Bake your own droplet lens
Spinnor is offline
Dec21-13, 03:49 PM
P: 1,362
Using Wolfram Alpha,



integral from 0 to infinity of ( exp[-at])dt


fzero is offline
Dec21-13, 04:17 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 2,606
There's a nice clear presentation of the argument given in the 1951 Schwinger paper at http://www.thetangentbundle.net/wiki...time_formalism. Post back if that doesn't help.

Register to reply

Related Discussions
Is proper length measured in the same reference frame as proper time. Introductory Physics Homework 0
How does the length contraction work for proper length? Special & General Relativity 8
Length contraction from lorentz transformation. Keep messing up the proper length Special & General Relativity 10
when we use arc length as a parameter Calculus 5
Basic Calculus III- Arc Length Parameter and Length- Getting a negative length Calculus & Beyond Homework 6