Proof of the Pythagorean theorem using Dimensional analysis

In summary, dimensional analysis is a mathematical technique used to analyze the relationship between different physical quantities. It can be used to prove the Pythagorean theorem by showing that the units on each side of the equation are equivalent. The basic steps involve setting up the equation, converting the sides into their respective units, and simplifying the equation using algebraic operations. However, dimensional analysis can only be used to prove the theorem for right triangles and has limitations in providing a geometric or algebraic proof. It can also be applied to similar triangles to prove the theorem.
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Yes, it is. However, just taking that "40000" into the function, f, gets you right back to the original form. They are only saying that the area is equal to the largest edge, squared, times some function of the two angles. Since that function is left undetermined, constants don't matter.
 

1. How does dimensional analysis prove the Pythagorean theorem?

Dimensional analysis is a mathematical technique used to analyze the relationship between different physical quantities. In the case of the Pythagorean theorem, dimensional analysis can be used to show that the units on each side of the equation are equivalent, providing a proof of the theorem.

2. What are the basic steps of using dimensional analysis to prove the Pythagorean theorem?

The basic steps involve setting up the equation with the three sides of the right triangle, converting each side into its respective units (length, width, and height), and then simplifying the equation using algebraic operations until it reduces to the Pythagorean theorem.

3. Can dimensional analysis be used to prove the Pythagorean theorem for non-right triangles?

No, dimensional analysis can only be used to prove the Pythagorean theorem for right triangles. This is because the theorem is specific to right triangles and does not hold true for other types of triangles.

4. Are there any limitations to using dimensional analysis to prove the Pythagorean theorem?

Yes, dimensional analysis is limited to providing a proof of the Pythagorean theorem in terms of units. It does not provide a geometric or algebraic proof of the theorem, which may be necessary in certain applications.

5. How does dimensional analysis relate to the concept of similarity in triangles?

Dimensional analysis can be used to prove the Pythagorean theorem for similar triangles as well. This is because similar triangles have proportional sides, which can be converted into equivalent units using dimensional analysis, ultimately leading to the proof of the theorem.

Similar threads

B Fermat's Last Theorem; unacceptable proof, why?
    • General Math
Replies
12
Views
2K
MHB Why isn't {0}^{3}+{0}^{3}={0}^{3} a proof for Fermat's Last Theorem?
    • General Math
Replies
3
Views
2K
Simple Pythagorean Theorem Proof Explored
    • General Math
Replies
10
Views
2K
Disproving Pythagorean Theorem
    • General Math
Replies
4
Views
9K
B Question about the fundamental theorem of calculus
    • Calculus
Replies
2
Views
267
I Recursion theorem: application in proof
    • General Math
Replies
2
Views
1K
A The Blessings of Dimensionality and Hilbert's 6th Problem
    • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
1K
I Understanding the Heine Borel Theorem: An In-Depth Analysis
    • General Math
Replies
3
Views
2K
B A proof of the fundamental theorem of calculus
    • Calculus
Replies
6
Views
2K
I Using Dimensional Analysis to derive an equation (Walter Lewin video)
    • Classical Physics
Replies
5
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top