Is energy convertible to matter?

In summary, energy and matter are not separate entities, but rather different forms of the same thing. We can convert energy into matter by concentrating it to a high enough level, resulting in the creation of new particles. However, the idea of converting energy into matter is based on outdated notions of mass and energy being distinct. The mass-energy equivalence, expressed in Einstein's famous equation E=mc^2, shows that mass and energy are equivalent and can be converted into each other. This also explains why we cannot reach the speed of light, as it would require infinite energy.
  • #1
Aromal
14
0
Can we convert energy to matter?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
No, but we can convert photons to matter, which may be what you actually wanted to ask.

Energy is a property, not a "thing".
 
  • #3
Aromal said:
Can we convert energy to matter?

Yes! We do it on a regular basis, actually. In particle colliders like LHC, two particles are accelerated until they have a lot of kinetic energy, you smash them together, and you end up with a whole bunch more particles than you started with.
 
  • #4
DaleSpam said:
Energy is a property, not a "thing".

And that property allows you to produce more matter since particle number isn't conserved in QFT. I don't understand your point.
 
  • #5
typically you are going to have particles becoming other particles. I think this is what DaleSpam means.
 
  • #6
Einstein's Energy Equation E=mc2. Can we write the reverse equation as
m=E/c2 ?
 
  • #7
LastOneStanding said:
And that property allows you to produce more matter since particle number isn't conserved in QFT. I don't understand your point.
You can convert things with energy (e.g. a pair of photons) into other things with energy (e.g. an electron and positron). Energy doesn't exist by itself, so you cannot simply convert energy (without an accompanying thing) into matter.

This is important because any of the things that have energy also have other properties, such as spin, or momentum, or charge, etc.
 
  • #8
BruceW said:
typically you are going to have particles becoming other particles. I think this is what DaleSpam means.
Yes.
 
  • #9
Aromal said:
Einstein's Energy Equation E=mc2. Can we write the reverse equation as
m=E/c2 ?
Certainly, and you can write E/c=mc, and you can write E/m=c², and you can write mc²/E=1, and any other permutation I may have missed. You can add a constant to both sides, square both sides, do whatever you like. All of the normal rules of math apply.
 
  • #10
Aromal said:
Einstein's Energy Equation E=mc2. Can we write the reverse equation as
m=E/c2 ?
yes. as long as 'm' stands for relativistic mass. In essence, c^2 is just a conversion of units. you can even use natural units where c=1, so that E=m i.e. relativistic mass is just another word for energy.

Also, there are two other concepts: rest mass and invariant mass. These are different from the relativistic mass, and follow other equations.
 
  • #11
Thank you Dalespam I got the idea.. I did'nt know energy is a property still now.
 
  • #12
BruceW,thanks
 
  • #13
yes, energy can be condensed to mass.
 
  • #14
I would like to see all permutations and the meaning. Like C=√e/m
Is this the reason we cannot get matter to light speed?
 
  • #15
zdroide said:
Is this the reason we cannot get matter to light speed?
It is related. The formula ##E=m c^2## is the formula for the energy of a system whose momentum, ##p=0##. In other words, it is the energy at rest.

For a system which is moving the more general formula is ##E^2/c^2=m^2 c^2+p^2##. For a massive particle ##p=mv/\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}## which goes to infinity as v goes to c.
 
  • #16
zdroide said:
I would like to see all permutations and the meaning.
The meaning is the same, that rest energy and mass are equivalent. Two things that were previously thought to be different are instead the same.

You see the phrase "matter is converted to energy" as an explanation for things like the explosion of a uranium bomb where there is a reduction in mass equivalent to a production of energy. The point of the mass-energy equivalence, though, is that the energy was there all along, we just didn't recognize it as energy. We recognized it as mass. Thus the notion of mass being a measure of the amount of matter has to be abandoned. But the very phrase "matter is converted to energy" is a remnant of that now-abandoned notion.

This conversion of mass to energy is not unique to nuclear explosions. The same thing happens in a camp fire, but the reduction in mass is too small to be measured, so previous notions (notions that mass and rest energy are different things) ignored it. Indeed, how is one supposed to not ignore something one cannot detect?!

Is this the reason we cannot get matter to light speed?

No. It's rather the other way around. The postulate is that light speed is the same to all observers. So if you, as an observer, were to chase after a light beam you'd never make progress because you would forever see it recede from you at light speed. It therefore follows that you can never attain light speed. And the mass-energy equivalence also follows from that same idea. It's all based on the Principle of Relativity, something that dates back to the time of Galileo. Einstein is famous for incorporating the propagation of light into that principle, and in the process coming up with the mass-energy equivalence.
 
Last edited:
  • #17
Aromal said:
Can we convert energy to matter?

You bet. One example is that when the concentration of energy becomes very high it sort of congeals into an electron-positron pair.
 
  • Like
Likes zdroide
  • #18
I understand that at speed of light, mass go infinite and time should collapse. It will need infinite power to move one gram at light speed. A backwards mirror would may show slow motion or all time compress. I did not look at this.
Can you transform e=mc^2 and isolate c. What this equation mean, in static or moving form.
I may missing knowledge. But square of speed of light is a big speed.
Seem to work on atom level.
It is easier to understand pi since you can calculate it easy with any circle
 
  • #19
Hornbein said:
"Can we convert energy to matter" You bet. One example is that when the concentration of energy becomes very high it sort of congeals into an electron-positron pair.
No. One example is: a table has some lenght. Can we "convert length in a table?" Of course not. In the same way "a portion of matter has some energy, so we cannot convert energy into matter".

--
lightarrow
 
  • #20
zdroide said:
Can you transform e=mc^2 and isolate c.
You can do this, but it doesn't change the meaning at all. This is off topic for this thread, if you want to discuss rearrangements of formulas more then please start a new thread. But I don't anticipate that you will get anything interesting since it doesn't change the meaning.

I am going to go ahead and close this thread.
 

What is the concept of energy being convertible to matter?

The concept of energy being convertible to matter is based on the equation E=mc², which was proposed by Albert Einstein. This equation suggests that energy and matter are interchangeable and can be converted from one form to another.

How does energy convert to matter?

Energy can convert to matter through a process known as pair production. This occurs when a high-energy photon, such as a gamma ray, interacts with matter and produces a particle-antiparticle pair (e.g. an electron and a positron).

What evidence supports the idea of energy being convertible to matter?

One major piece of evidence supporting the idea of energy being convertible to matter is the observation of pair production in high-energy particle collisions. This has been confirmed by numerous experiments, including those conducted at the Large Hadron Collider.

Are there any limitations to the conversion of energy to matter?

While energy can be converted to matter, there are limitations to this process. For example, the amount of energy needed to produce a certain amount of matter is determined by the mass-energy equivalence, as represented by the equation E=mc². Additionally, certain conservation laws must also be followed in the conversion process.

What practical applications does the concept of energy being convertible to matter have?

The concept of energy being convertible to matter has practical applications in fields such as nuclear energy and medical imaging. In nuclear reactions, a small amount of matter is converted into a large amount of energy, which can be harnessed for electricity. In medical imaging, positron emission tomography (PET) scans use the conversion of energy to matter to produce images of the body's internal structures.

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
749
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
23
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
242
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
695
Replies
38
Views
2K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
3
Views
662
  • Classical Physics
Replies
12
Views
1K
Back
Top