- #1
radioactive8
- 46
- 0
Hi...!
I was trying to understand the meaning of the binary Energy (Eb) ..
For example :
Imagine we have two cores ... 1 from an X atom and 1 from an Y atom which have the same A and X has bigger Eb than Y ... while Y is the stable core for that exact A ...
That means
Because energy is never lost
Eb + EY = Ep + En ⇔ ... ⇔
Eb = ( ZMp + NMn - MY )c2
But what i can't understand is the following
Why isn't X more stable as it has bigger binary energy therefore the same number of protons and netrons are hold by bigger power ?
HOWEVER if we look at the opposite way
Why isn't any core with smaller binary energy and same A than X stablier because its stableness would require less energy ...
But our researches have shown that both above are not true ... but why ?
I was trying to understand the meaning of the binary Energy (Eb) ..
For example :
Imagine we have two cores ... 1 from an X atom and 1 from an Y atom which have the same A and X has bigger Eb than Y ... while Y is the stable core for that exact A ...
That means
Because energy is never lost
Eb + EY = Ep + En ⇔ ... ⇔
Eb = ( ZMp + NMn - MY )c2
But what i can't understand is the following
Why isn't X more stable as it has bigger binary energy therefore the same number of protons and netrons are hold by bigger power ?
HOWEVER if we look at the opposite way
Why isn't any core with smaller binary energy and same A than X stablier because its stableness would require less energy ...
But our researches have shown that both above are not true ... but why ?