Need help with stable-unstable cores(cells)

  • Thread starter radioactive8
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discussed the concept of binary energy, also known as binding energy, and its relationship to the stability of atoms. The question was raised about why an atom with a larger binding energy is not always more stable than one with a smaller binding energy. However, the research has shown that this is not always the case and there is no general rule for predicting the stability of atoms based on their binding energies. Additional factors such as nuclear spin and proton/neutron numbers also play a role in determining an atom's stability.
  • #1
radioactive8
46
0
Hi...!
I was trying to understand the meaning of the binary Energy (Eb) ..
For example :
Imagine we have two cores ... 1 from an X atom and 1 from an Y atom which have the same A and X has bigger Eb than Y ... while Y is the stable core for that exact A ...
That means
Because energy is never lost
Eb + EY = Ep + En ⇔ ... ⇔

Eb = ( ZMp + NMn - MY )c2

But what i can't understand is the following

Why isn't X more stable as it has bigger binary energy therefore the same number of protons and netrons are hold by bigger power ?

HOWEVER if we look at the opposite way
Why isn't any core with smaller binary energy and same A than X stablier because its stableness would require less energy ...

But our researches have shown that both above are not true ... but why ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What is "binary energy"? Do you mean "binding energy"?

An atom K can decay into another atom L of the same nucleon number if L has a larger binding energy, the opposite is not possible neglecting electron capture.
 
  • #3
What is "binary energy"? Do you mean "binding energy"?

Yes

An atom K can decay into another atom L of the same nucleon number if L has a larger binding energy, the opposite is not possible neglecting electron capture.

This doent answer my question ...
I am wondering about which cell is stablier K or L (fro your example ) .. and why ...
 
  • #4
If both are unstable, there is no general rule for their lifetimes, it depends on too many other factors (like nuclear spin, odd/even proton/neutron numbers and so on). The setup you described in post 1 (instable atom with larger binding energy decaying to stable atom with smaller binding energy) is not possible. Again, neglecting electron capture.
 

What are stable and unstable cores(cells)?

Stable cores (cells) refer to cells that have a balanced ratio of neutrons and protons in their nucleus, making them less likely to undergo nuclear decay. On the other hand, unstable cores (cells) have an unbalanced ratio and are more likely to undergo nuclear decay.

Why is it important to study stable and unstable cores(cells)?

Studying stable and unstable cores (cells) is important because it helps us understand the fundamental principles of nuclear physics and the behavior of matter at a subatomic level. It also has practical applications in fields such as medicine, energy production, and environmental protection.

How can we identify stable and unstable cores(cells)?

We can identify stable and unstable cores (cells) by looking at their atomic and mass numbers. Generally, nuclei with atomic numbers lower than 20 and mass numbers that are close to the atomic number are considered stable, while those with higher atomic numbers and mass numbers are more likely to be unstable.

What factors can cause a core(cell) to become unstable?

Several factors can cause a core (cell) to become unstable, such as having too many or too few neutrons compared to protons, having an atomic number higher than 83, or undergoing nuclear reactions and decays. External factors such as high temperature, pressure, or radiation can also affect the stability of a core (cell).

What are the potential hazards of unstable cores(cells)?

Unstable cores (cells) can pose hazards such as releasing harmful radiation and causing nuclear reactions that can lead to explosions. These hazards can have detrimental effects on living organisms and the environment. Therefore, proper handling and disposal of unstable cores (cells) are crucial in ensuring safety and preventing potential dangers.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
589
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Chemistry
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top