Physics in the 21st century

  • Thread starter juanREMOVE@canonicalscience.com
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Physics
In summary, the new report available for download in pdf format from the canonicalscience site is a 16-page perspective that addresses social, political, and economic problems affecting the scientific community. It expands upon previous works published in Nature and Physics Today by other authors. The report includes an abstract discussing the current state of science in the 21st century, including issues such as limited scholarly communication, funding of research, journal rates and page charges, intellectual property wars, and anonymous censorship. It also features an economic analysis of PLoS' finances and a list of Nobel Laureates whose work was rejected by peer review. The report offers suggestions from various experts on how to address these problems and concludes with
  • #1
juanREMOVE@canonicalscience.com
This new report is ready to be downloaded (in pdf format) from the
canonicalscience site.

It is a /perspective/ of 16 pages long that deals with some problems of
physics. It extends a number of other works published in /Nature/ and /
Physics Today/ by other authors.

This is the abstract:

(\abstract
This report presents a nonidealized vision of 21st century science. It
handles some social, political, and economic problems that affect the
heart of scientific endeavour and are carrying important consequences
for scientists and the rest of society.

The problems analyzed are the current tendency to limit the size of
scholarly communications, the funding of research, the rates and page
charges of journals, the wars for the intellectual property of the data
and results of research, and the replacement of impartial reviewing by
anonymous censorship. The scope includes an economic analysis of PLoS'
finances, the wars APS versus Wikipedia and ACS versus NIH, and a list
of thirty four Nobel Laureates whose awarded work was rejected by peer
review.

Several suggestions from Harry Morrow Brown, Lee Smolin, Linda Cooper,
and the present author for solving the problems are included in the
report. The work finishes with a brief section on the reasons to be
optimists about the future of science.
)

Comments ans corrections are welcomed.

NEWS LINK:

http://www.canonicalscience.org/en/publicationzone/ [Broken]
canonicalsciencetoday/20081113.html

Also accesible from index,

--
http://www.canonicalscience.org/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
On 26 Nov, 17:43, juanREM...@canonicalscience.com wrote:
> This new report is ready to be downloaded (in pdf format) from the
> canonicalscience site.
>


[[Mod. note -- Excess quoted text excised by moderator. -- jt]]

>  The problems analyzed are the current tendency to limit the size of
>  scholarly communications, the funding of research, the rates and page
>  charges of journals, the wars for the intellectual property of the data
>  and results of research, and the replacement of impartial reviewing by
>  anonymous censorship. The scope includes an economic analysis of PLoS'
>  finances, the wars APS versus Wikipedia and ACS versus NIH, and a list
>   of thirty four Nobel Laureates whose awarded work was rejected by peer
>  review.


[[Mod. note -- Excess quoted text excised by moderator. -- jt]]

My main bugbear is the cost of access of scientific publications. I am
now retired but I like to keep abreast of scientific developments.
Paying the exorbitant sums demanded is out of the question for me.
There does indeed seem to be little justification.

I suppose you get what you can. I can't help feeling that the money is
being circulated. Universities get suported by the government,
industry etc. A proportion of the money allocated goes on supporting
publications. If this was supplied directly and the publication (in
electronic form) were free, you would not in fact be spending any more
money than you are now. In fact you might well be spending less.
 
  • #3
On Nov 27, 10:39 am, Ian Parker <ianpark...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> My main bugbear is the cost of access of scientific publications. I am
> now retired but I like to keep abreast of scientific developments.
> Paying the exorbitant sums demanded is out of the question for me.
> There does indeed seem to be little justification.
>
> I suppose you get what you can. I can't help feeling that the money is
> being circulated. Universities get suported by the government,
> industry etc. A proportion of the money allocated goes on supporting
> publications. If this was supplied directly and the publication (in
> electronic form) were free, you would not in fact be spending any more
> money than you are now. In fact you might well be spending less.


The majority of new papers in physics/math are available for free at
the arxiv.org preprint site. It has useful search tools too. You also
get to see a wider variety of papers than the smaller number that
survive the peer review gauntlet.

Yours in science,
Knecht
www.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw
 

What is the current state of research in physics in the 21st century?

The field of physics in the 21st century is constantly growing and evolving. Currently, there is a strong focus on studying quantum mechanics, dark matter and energy, and the origins of the universe. Research is also being conducted in areas such as biophysics, nanotechnology, and renewable energy sources.

How has technology impacted the advancements in physics in the 21st century?

Technology has played a crucial role in the advancements of physics in the 21st century. With the development of powerful computers and advanced equipment, scientists are able to conduct more complex experiments and simulations, leading to a deeper understanding of the laws and principles of physics.

What are some potential real-world applications of recent physics discoveries?

Recent discoveries in physics have the potential to impact various industries and everyday life. For example, advancements in materials science and nanotechnology could lead to more efficient and lightweight electronic devices. Understanding dark matter and energy could also have implications for renewable energy sources.

How does collaboration between different scientific disciplines contribute to progress in physics?

Collaboration between different scientific disciplines is essential for progress in physics in the 21st century. Physics is a broad field that intersects with many other fields such as chemistry, biology, and engineering. By working together, scientists can bring different perspectives and expertise to solve complex problems and make new discoveries.

What are some of the current challenges and controversies in physics in the 21st century?

One of the main challenges in physics in the 21st century is the reconciliation of general relativity and quantum mechanics. This has led to various theories and debates, such as string theory and the multiverse theory. Additionally, the field of physics also faces challenges in terms of funding and public understanding and support.

Similar threads

  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
8
Views
828
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
0
Views
904
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Art, Music, History, and Linguistics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
30
Views
7K
Back
Top