Sign confusion of Mirrors/Lenses.

In summary, the signs used for mirrors and lenses can be memorized by understanding the direction of light rays and their focal points. For concave mirrors, the focal point is positive and objects on the same side are positive, while objects on the other side are negative. For convex mirrors, the focal point is negative and objects on the same side are negative (virtual) and objects on the other side are positive (real). For converging lenses, both focal points are positive and all images are positive. For diverging lenses, both focal points are negative and all images are negative and virtual. The Cartesian sign convention should be used for distances and heights measured along and perpendicular to the principal axis, respectively. This convention is commonly used in professional optics
  • #1
AznBoi
471
0
To clear up the confusion of signs to use for mirrors and lenses. Would this be a correct way of memorizing the signs? For the equation: 1/s_o+1/s_i=1/f

Mirrors:
Concave: Since light actually converges at the focal point, it's positive.
Any image that is on the same side as the focal point, object is positive.
Any image on the other side is negative.

Convex: Since light diverges away from the virtual focal point, it's negative. Any image formed on the same side of the focal point is negative (virtual) and image formed on the other side of the virtual focal point is positive (real).

Lenses:
Converging: Since light rays actually passes through both of the focal points, they are both positive. images are always positive?

Diverging: Since light rays never pass both of the focal points (is this true?) both of the focal points are negative. All images are negative and virtual?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
convex lenses have exceptions for u<f...because at that distance rays don't meet actually...the covention to which u are adapted is very confusing...i don't use this one...
 
  • #3
Cartesian sign convention is as follows:
1. For distances measured along the principal axis
(a) the incident light is drawn for convenience traveling from left to right.
(b) all distances are measured FROM the vertex of the surface
(c) the numerical value of a distance which is measured in the SAME DIRECTION as that in which light is traveling is given a POSITIVE SIGN.
(d) the numerical value of a distance which is measured in the OPPOSITE DIRECTION to that in which light is traveling is given a NEGATIVE SIGN.

2. For distances and heights measured perpendicular to the axis
(a) all heights are measured FROM the axis
(b) the numerical value of a height which is measure ABOVE the axis is given a POSITIVE SIGN
(c) the numerical value of a height that is measured BELOW the axis is given a NEGATIVE SIGN

This applies to both lenses and mirrors in exactly the same way with convex thin lenses and curved mirrors both having positive focal lengths and concave thin lenses and curved mirrors both having negative focal lengths.

In professional optics and in all raytracing software this is the convention that is used, i really do not see any point in using other conventions as, although they will work for some simple calculations they fail in more complex systems. Also the use of Cartesian sign convention is a much more common sense approach and gives us more detailed and accurate information with regards to the orientation of the final image, ie a real image will always have a positive sign indicating that it lies in the image space, while a virtual image will have a negative sign indicating that it lies in the object space. This also applies to upright and inverted images and enlarged or reduced images.
 
  • #4
Please also be aware that the thin lens formula that you have stated is intended for use with the 'real is positive' convention, in which, the symbols are taken at face value and the fact that these reciprocals are related receives no attention. The sign is taken as positive for a real object or image distance, and negative (for a virtual object or image distance).

The problem with this method is that it ONLY works for very simple problems.

It really does seem strange to me that people are being taught optics using this method because quite frankly it is bunkum.

If you want to do it properly the correct form of the thin lens equation is:
1/f = 1/l' - 1/l ,
where l and l' are the image and object distances respectively and f is the focal length.
Using this formula in conjunction with Cartesian sign convention is how it's done properly.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
So basically, if light passes through or is able to bounce off an object, focal length, image. They are POSITIVE? If light is unable to hit the object, focal length, image, they are negative and their for virtual? Is this always true?

Are these concepts always right?:
100. For a single optical device, real images are always inverted and virtual images are always upright.
• Concave mirrors and Converging lenses produce virtual, upright images when the object distance (s_o) is less than the focal length (f)

101. Concave mirrors are converging and convex mirrors are diverging. Concave lenses are diverging and convex lenses are converging.

102. Convex mirrors and concave lenses produce only small virtual images.
 
  • #6
Ray diagrams are your friend in optics
 
  • #7
Bezza said:
If you want to do it properly the correct form of the thin lens equation is:
1/f = 1/l' - 1/l ,
where l and l' are the image and object distances respectively and f is the focal length.

Would you clarify things a bit?
 
  • #8
l (image distance) is negative when an inverted image is formed, right?
 
  • #9
Ahmed Abdullah said:
Would you clarify things a bit?

Ok here's a worked example.

An object 2cm high is placed 60cm in front of a thin converging lens with a focal length of 20cm. Calculate the position and size of the image.

Lens Power (in dioptres), F = 1/f' = 1/0.2 = +5.00D
Object Vergence, L = 1/l = 1/-0.6 = -1.67D
Image Vergence, L' = L+F = -1.67 + 5.00 = +3.33D
Image Distance, l' = 1/L' = 1/3.33 = +0.3m

Magnification, m = h'/h = L/L'
m = -1.67/3.33 = -0.5

Image Size, h' = m*h = -0.5*2 = -1cm

The Image is Real, Inverted and Reduced, it lies +30cm from the lens surface and is -1cm high.

And if we change the lens in the question for a diverging lens...

Lens Power (in dioptres), F = 1/f' = 1/-0.2 = -5.00D
Object Vergence, L = 1/l = 1/-0.6 = -1.67D
Image Vergence, L' = L+F = -1.67 - 5.00 = -6.67D
Image Distance, l' = 1/L' = 1/-6.67 = -0.15m

Magnification, m = h'/h = L/L'
m = -1.67/-6.67 = 0.25

Image Size, h' = m*h = 0.25*2 = 0.5cm

The image is Virtual, Upright and Reduced, it lies -15cm from the lens surface and is +0.5cm high.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
For converging lens: 1/u + 1/v = 1/f

If f = 15 cm, u =20 cm thus v = 60 cm

magnification = v/u = +3 implies image is upright by sign convention but through experiment image is inverted.

Anyone can explain?
 
  • #11
labview1958 said:
magnification = v/u = +3 implies image is upright by sign convention but through experiment image is inverted.
Magnification = -v/u, not v/u.
 

1. What is sign confusion of mirrors/lenses?

The sign confusion of mirrors/lenses refers to the incorrect interpretation of the sign conventions used in ray diagrams to represent the direction of light rays. This can result in incorrect predictions of the behavior of light rays in mirrors and lenses.

2. How does sign confusion occur in mirrors/lenses?

Sign confusion can occur when the sign conventions for the direction of light rays are not followed consistently. For example, if a light ray is reflected off a mirror and then passes through a lens, the direction of the light ray may be represented using opposite sign conventions at each step.

3. What are the consequences of sign confusion in mirrors/lenses?

The consequences of sign confusion in mirrors/lenses include incorrect predictions of the location and size of images formed by mirrors and lenses. This can lead to errors in designing and using optical instruments, such as telescopes and microscopes.

4. How can sign confusion in mirrors/lenses be avoided?

To avoid sign confusion in mirrors/lenses, it is important to consistently use the same sign conventions for the direction of light rays in ray diagrams. It can also be helpful to label the direction of light rays with arrows to ensure consistency and accuracy.

5. Are there any tips for understanding sign conventions in mirrors/lenses?

One tip for understanding sign conventions in mirrors/lenses is to remember that light rays always travel in a straight line. This can help to determine the direction of light rays in ray diagrams and avoid sign confusion. It can also be helpful to practice drawing and interpreting ray diagrams to become more familiar with the sign conventions.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
824
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
918
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
810
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
616
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
1K
Back
Top