Boost PC Performance with a Dual Core CPU: Worth it or Not?

In summary: He is saying that most laptop buyers will not be able to use their new laptops for 3 years because most laptop buyers in 2006 will have dual-core CPUs.
  • #1
Saint
437
0
How much can it boost PC performance?
Worth it or not?
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
  • #2
Apparetly up to 70% more.. if the program you are using supports multiple processors.

If not, just do two things at the same time!
 
  • #3
For a normal or ever power user, it doesn't make much sense. Usually dual processors are ment for servers. If you get a single p4 3.4 with good memory your computer will be fast enough for anything.
 
  • #4
Multicore CPUs

Greg Bernhardt said:
For a normal or ever power user, it doesn't make much sense.
For a laptop user who wants power efficiency and cost economy, it seems to make sense:


  • By 2006 ... two cores ... will be found in ... 70 percent of ... mobile ... products.


Usually dual processors are ment for servers.
Parallel multi-processing is meant for achieving maximum performance-economy. Sometimes it is done more for economy. Sometimes it is done more for novel levels of performance:


  • Q.What about parallel machines?

    A. Machines with many processors are much faster than single processors can be. Parallelism itself presents no advantages, and parallel machines are somewhat awkward to program. When extreme speed is required, it is necessary to face this awkwardness.


If you get a single p4 3.4 with good memory your computer will be fast enough for anything.
  • ... My 486/50 is fast enough for the jobs I run on it. I've got a 486/33 that's serving as a mail/web server that's fast enough.
 
  • #5
It's like dual processor systems.

You can assign one task to each processor, say Photoshop to one and The Sims 2 to the other. If you need to do two completely separate things at the same time, it's a huge boost. You can leave something rendering in 3D Studio Max for days while you use the computer normally.

You can also run two instances of a parallel task at the same time. Something like Folding at Home. I have a dual 2800+ system and I produce two times the units that I would if I only had one processor.

If software is multithreaded, the benefits can be pretty big. One process can have one thread of execution running on one processor and have another thread on the other processor.

Basically it has advantages for multitasking which is becoming more prominent.

I wouldn't worry about it right now though. It will be a while before it's really necessary on a CPU.
 
  • #6
dual processor systems have been around for years, and lately HT((hyper threading)dual CPU emulation) has been around, and now there is a true dual core CPU out, but it is nbot a good iddea for the end user..
 
  • #7
alexkerhead said:
dual processor systems have been around for years, and lately HT((hyper threading)dual CPU emulation) has been around, and now there is a true dual core CPU out, but it is nbot a good iddea for the end user..

What makes you say that?
 
  • #8
Chaotic42 said:
What makes you say that?
because it will be 5 or more years before any software company releases software with coding that will utilize a dual core system, becuase it is mainly for servers now, and they want to keep charging $1500 a copy for server software..
Just my theory.. :smile:
 
  • #9
in this case, a P4 3GHZ with HT , 256 MB AGP and 7.1 channel sound system will be good enough for all purposes.
 
  • #10
Saint said:
in this case, a P4 3GHZ with HT , 256 MB AGP and 7.1 channel sound system will be good enough for all purposes.
for all purposes for a long time Saint..
 
  • #11
alexkerhead said:
because it will be 5 or more years before any software company releases software with coding that will utilize a dual core system, becuase it is mainly for servers now, and they want to keep charging $1500 a copy for server software..
Just my theory.. :smile:

Well, id tried that with Quake 3. I think it ended up being slower on dual systems. I thought that you were saying that they are just useless.

I think that they are (for the end user) right now, but soon every computer will have one. Just my prediction.
 
  • #12
Chaotic42 said:
Well, id tried that with Quake 3. I think it ended up being slower on dual systems. I thought that you were saying that they are just useless.

I think that they are (for the end user) right now, but soon every computer will have one. Just my prediction.
eventually, every PC will have todays "cant touch" hardware..
10 years ago, 4GHz was unthinkable without a mega super cluster computer mainframe.
 
  • #13
Windows XP can already take advantage of dual-core processors

alexkerhead said:
it will be 5 or more years before any software company releases software with coding that will utilize a dual core system
If 70% of brand-new laptops in 2006 come equipped with dual-core CPUs then 70% of laptop buyers in 2006 will be unable to use their new laptops for 3 years?


  • http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1639843,00.asp.
 
  • #14
hitssquad said:
If 70% of brand-new laptops in 2006 come equipped with dual-core CPUs then 70% of laptop buyers in 2006 will be unable to use their new laptops for 3 years?


  • http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1639843,00.asp.
uh, you forget the hardware/software will still utilize older software/hardware.. :tongue2:
 
  • #15
Greg Bernhardt said:
For a normal or ever power user, it doesn't make much sense. Usually dual processors are ment for servers. If you get a single p4 3.4 with good memory your computer will be fast enough for anything.

bah! Dual core CPUs and even SMP are good for anyone. an OS will schedule processes to run on the two CPUs at the same time which means that your computer will get a process done faster because it gets more time on a CPU than if you had only one CPU.
 

1. Is it worth upgrading to a dual core CPU for better PC performance?

It ultimately depends on your specific needs and usage. If you frequently use demanding software or perform multiple tasks at once, a dual core CPU can provide significant performance improvements. However, if you primarily use your computer for basic tasks such as web browsing and word processing, the upgrade may not be necessary.

2. How does a dual core CPU improve PC performance?

A dual core CPU has two cores (or processing units) instead of one, which allows it to handle more tasks simultaneously. This can result in faster processing speeds and smoother multitasking.

3. Are there any downsides to upgrading to a dual core CPU?

The main downside is the cost of the upgrade. Dual core CPUs tend to be more expensive than single core CPUs. Additionally, some software may not be optimized to take advantage of multiple cores, so you may not see a significant performance boost in certain applications.

4. Can I upgrade to a dual core CPU on my current computer?

It depends on your current computer's motherboard and compatibility with dual core CPUs. You may need to research your specific motherboard model and consult with a technician to determine if an upgrade is possible.

5. Is a dual core CPU better than a quad core or higher?

It depends on your specific usage and needs. For basic tasks, a dual core CPU may be sufficient. However, for more demanding tasks such as gaming or video editing, a quad core or higher CPU may provide better performance. It's important to research and consider your specific needs before deciding on a CPU upgrade.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
985
  • Computing and Technology
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • Computing and Technology
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • Computing and Technology
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Computing and Technology
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • Computing and Technology
Replies
3
Views
913
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Computing and Technology
2
Replies
43
Views
3K
Back
Top