System stability in the s-domain


by cocopops12
Tags: sdomain, stability
cocopops12
cocopops12 is offline
#1
Feb10-13, 05:18 AM
cocopops12's Avatar
P: 30
Can someone please explain WHY is it when the poles of F(s) have negative real parts, the system is stable.

Why is it when the poles of F(s) have positive real parts the system is unstable?

Why is it when the real parts of the poles of F(s) equal to 0 the system becomes metastable (oscillatory)

Thanks
Phys.Org News Partner Engineering news on Phys.org
A smart prosthetic knee with in-vivo diagnoses
Old tires become material for new and improved roads
Students take clot-buster for a spin
milesyoung
milesyoung is offline
#2
Feb10-13, 07:25 AM
P: 427
The reasons become clear when you do a partial fraction expansion of the output of the system and find its inverse Laplace transform.

You'll find factors of exp^(p_i*t) in all the terms of the natural response of the system, where p_i is the corresponding pole of the expansion and t is the time.

You can see what happens if the real part of the pole is positive or negative, exponential growth or decay.

You can find a better runthrough here (go down to 'Poles and the Impulse Response'):
http://www-control.eng.cam.ac.uk/gv/p6/Handout3.pdf


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Control system stability Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework 3
Stability of a system of DE's Calculus & Beyond Homework 2
Stability of a system of DE's Calculus & Beyond Homework 13
stability of system Calculus & Beyond Homework 4
Stability of a linear system Engineering, Comp Sci, & Technology Homework 5