- #1
Plastic Photon
- 138
- 0
http://www.physorg.com/news10789.html
Does anybody know anything about this Dr. Febler or the Advanced Institute at Austin? I can't find a dime to spit on.
I have not taken any physics courses yet, but I do know what is meant by 'exact' (as stated in the title) form my math courses.
Can such a thing as 'exact solution' exist in physics? I am sure it was not Febler's choice for a title, though. I find the use of the term 'anit-gravity' a little bit...uhm, not scientific. Isn't 'anit-gravity' what crackpots and quaks use to highlight their work, not a physicists?
Well, I will say bunko on this one. Even though nothing has been presented as of yet and with my capacity I should not be commenting on such things as this, but I have seen so many other congruent cases.
New antigravity solution will enable space travel near speed of light by the end of this century, he predicts.
On Tuesday, Feb. 14, noted physicist Dr. Franklin Felber will present his new exact solution of Einstein's 90-year-old gravitational field equation to the Space Technology and Applications International Forum (STAIF) in Albuquerque. The solution is the first that accounts for masses moving near the speed of light.
Does anybody know anything about this Dr. Febler or the Advanced Institute at Austin? I can't find a dime to spit on.
I have not taken any physics courses yet, but I do know what is meant by 'exact' (as stated in the title) form my math courses.
Can such a thing as 'exact solution' exist in physics? I am sure it was not Febler's choice for a title, though. I find the use of the term 'anit-gravity' a little bit...uhm, not scientific. Isn't 'anit-gravity' what crackpots and quaks use to highlight their work, not a physicists?
Well, I will say bunko on this one. Even though nothing has been presented as of yet and with my capacity I should not be commenting on such things as this, but I have seen so many other congruent cases.
Last edited: