Calculating pressure coeff. in triangular panel method

In summary: Yes, you have to define boundary conditions at the nodes. However, in principle, you could also define them at the center of the triangular panel.
  • #1
pjmab101
1
0
hi,

i am currently writing a 3D panel method program which uses triangular panels. i have written the part that calculates the doublet strengths on each panel and these seem to be correct. however i am having trouble determining the pressure coefficients from the doublet strengths.

now, for a four-sided panel method the local velocity tangential to the wing panel is the derivative of the doublet strength with respect to distance. this is done using a finite difference approach, by finding the change in doublet strength across adjacent panels and dividing by distance between panel control points. this is done in the spanwise and chordwise directions and then the cp is calculated as follows:

cp=1.0-((qinf+ql)^2+qm^2)/(vt^2)

where qinf is the local freestream vel, ql is local chordwise vel, qm is local spanwise vel. and vt is the freestream vel.

my problem is, how can i adapt this so that it works for triangular panels that may not be regular in shape, size or orientation?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Triangular panel methods

Hi there, I saw thata you wrote a code for triangular patches for a panel method. I wanted to ask you if your problem is for a lifting surface problem and/or multi-components body

I can't help you with your question you posted, but ifyou could tell me a little more of what you are doing, that could help because I am trying to actually modify a code for sails that is currently using quadrangular patches,

Thanks a lot,

Simone (simone.marras@gmail.com)
 
  • #3
pjmab101 said:
[...] how can i adapt this so that it works for triangular panels that may not be regular in shape, size or orientation?

I had a similar concern once when I wanted to implement a 3D panel method, but never got to actually do it.

Note that pressure coefficient in potential flow at certain point depends only on local velocity at that point. The term [tex](q_\infty + q_l)^2 + q_m^2[/tex] in the formula for [tex]c_p[/tex] that you give is the local velocity squared.

So, I thought that to find [tex]c_p[/tex] at the control point of a triangular panel, one could do like this. First, compute FD at each of three sides, using this and neigboring panel doublet strength. This should give local disturbance velocity at each side middle point (and that would be a vector -- doublet-FD provides magnitude, and side normal in the plane of the panel provides direction). To this free stream velocity vector should be added, to obtain total local velocity.

Now, there are three points (panel side middle points), and three values in them (local velocity vectors). This is enough to define linear velocity distribution over the panel (ie. velocity-plane), so that velocity vector at the control point can be interpolated.

Admittedly, to work out all the vector stuff may be a bit ugly. It would certainly ease the derivation if you have vector algebra facilities in your code.

Whatever you do, please report how it turned out. May save me some time in the future, too :)

--
Chusslove Illich (Часлав Илић)
 
Last edited:
  • #4


Hi there, thanks so much for replying so quickly. Look, are you considering constant strength doublets on each panel? Also, what does FD mean?
Ill surely let you have all the results I come across with once I am done (might take long though cause I am working on it only in weekends!)

Thank you

s.
 
  • #5
pjmab101 said:
Also, what does FD mean?

Finite differrence.

Look, are you considering constant strength doublets on each panel?

Yes, I guessed it so. That's why I said to take FDs at panel sides, as these are the only places where there are potential jumps.

Also note that by "add free stream velocity vector", I ment the component of this vector in the plane of the panel. There is no point considering panel normal direction anyway, as that component of velocity should always sum to zero -- but it won't, due to various (expected) errors.

--
Chusslove Illich (Часлав Илић)
 
  • #6
DFs

Thanks for replying, i just don´t understand the achronym DF that you are using
What does it mean?

thanks a lot

s.
 
  • #7
Hello,

I am developing equations for triangular panel method. I have made a little progress in defining some of them. I am using triangular element with linear source and doublet distributions. could anyone help me with defining the boundary conditions. Do i have to define B.C. at all the nodes or I can define in the centre of the Triangular panel?

Thanx
 

1. What is the triangular panel method and how does it work?

The triangular panel method is a method used to calculate the pressure coefficient on an airfoil. It works by dividing the airfoil into small triangular panels and then calculating the pressure coefficient at each panel. The pressure coefficient is a dimensionless value that represents the pressure distribution over the airfoil surface. By summing up the pressure coefficients of all the panels, the overall pressure distribution over the airfoil can be determined.

2. What is the formula for calculating the pressure coefficient using the triangular panel method?

The formula for calculating the pressure coefficient is: Cp = (P - P∞) / ½ρV², where Cp is the pressure coefficient, P is the local pressure, P∞ is the freestream pressure, ρ is the air density, and V is the freestream velocity. This formula is applied to each panel in the airfoil to determine the pressure coefficient at that specific location.

3. What are the assumptions made in the triangular panel method?

The triangular panel method makes a few assumptions in order to simplify the calculations. These include assuming that the airfoil is infinitely thin, that the flow is two-dimensional, and that the airfoil has a constant angle of attack. Additionally, the method assumes that the pressure distribution is linear over each panel, and that the flow is inviscid (no friction).

4. How accurate is the triangular panel method compared to other methods?

The accuracy of the triangular panel method depends on the number of panels used and the complexity of the airfoil. Generally, it is less accurate than computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods, but it can provide a good estimate of the pressure distribution over a simple airfoil. As the number of panels increases, the accuracy of the method also improves.

5. What are the limitations of the triangular panel method?

The triangular panel method has a few limitations. It is not suitable for highly complex geometries, such as airfoils with sharp corners or complex shapes. It also does not take into account the effects of viscosity and boundary layer separation. In addition, the method is only valid for incompressible, steady flow conditions.

Similar threads

  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
5
Views
13K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
2
Views
14K
  • Mechanics
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • General Engineering
Replies
16
Views
6K
Back
Top