Methods for Non-renormalizable theories?

  • Thread starter eljose79
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Theories
In summary, the conversation discusses methods for dealing with non-renormalizable theories, where a theory has divergences that cannot be absorbed through counterterms. One method is to renormalize in a higher dimension and then take the limit e=0, known as dimensional regularization. Another method is to introduce a cut-off in momentum integration and make an expansion. However, these methods are not always sufficient for non-renormalizable theories due to the growth of divergences with perturbative order.
  • #1
eljose79
1,518
1
I have some doubts when dealing with non-renormalizable theories in fact le,s suppose we have a theory that is non-renormalizable for n>4 or n=4 then we could do the trick of triying to renormalize it in 4-e dimension being e a small parameter e>0 and after that take the limit e=0 (dimensional regularization).

Another way would be to introduce a cut-off in momentum integrate for momentum<R being R the cut-off so the intgrals are function of R after that we would make an expansion through the singularity in R of the function I(R) and the singularities are isolated...


then now after the chat my question is why if these methods exist are still some non-renormalizable theories?...thanks for the reply.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
That's just regularizing the integral. To renormalize you also need to have counterterms to absorb the divergences. Non-renormalizable theories have divergences that grow with perturbative order and thus no amount of counterterms will be sufficient.
 

1. What are non-renormalizable theories?

Non-renormalizable theories are physical theories that cannot be made finite or "renormalized" through the standard techniques used in quantum field theory. These theories often involve higher order terms in the Lagrangian that lead to infinities in the calculations.

2. Why are non-renormalizable theories important?

Non-renormalizable theories are important because they can provide insights into fundamental physics beyond the currently accepted theories. They can also help bridge the gap between different branches of physics, such as quantum mechanics and general relativity.

3. What are some methods for dealing with non-renormalizable theories?

There are several methods for dealing with non-renormalizable theories, including effective field theory, dimensional regularization, and renormalization group methods. These methods involve approximations and truncations to make the calculations more manageable.

4. Can non-renormalizable theories be experimentally tested?

Yes, it is possible to test non-renormalizable theories through experiments and observations. However, due to their complex nature, it may be more challenging to make accurate predictions and confirm the validity of these theories.

5. What are the limitations of using non-renormalizable theories?

One major limitation of non-renormalizable theories is that they can lead to infinities in calculations, making it difficult to make precise predictions. Additionally, they may not be as well-supported by experimental evidence as renormalizable theories, making them less widely accepted in the scientific community.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
947
Replies
2
Views
838
Replies
3
Views
809
Replies
28
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
940
Replies
36
Views
3K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
957
Replies
1
Views
844
Back
Top