What constitutes a published philosopher

  • Thread starter pftest
  • Start date
In summary, the new philosophy forum rules require that when starting a new topic, a published philosopher or researcher must be referenced. This ensures that the topic is focused on a specific area of research or school of thought. To determine if a philosopher is "published", they must have a paper in one of the journals on the master journal list. If the paper is published elsewhere, it is acceptable as long as a PM is sent to the relevant forum's Mentor. As long as there is a desire to follow the forum rules, there is unlikely to be an infraction.
  • #1
pftest
249
0
what constitutes a "published" philosopher

In the new philosophy forum rules, it has this requirement:
When starting a new topic, you must reference a published philosopher or researcher who has worked on the topic. The idea is to focus the topic along the lines of a specific area of research or school of thought.

So if i were to open a topic, how do i know if a philosopher is "published"?

Does he have to have a paper in one of the journals of the master journal list?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Im asking because now its unclear if you will get an infraction when opening a topic.
 
  • #3


If he has a paper in the Master Journal list, that would be acceptable. If the paper/publication is elsewhere, send a PM to the Mentor in charge of the relevant forum (MIH, in this case) and check.

Whatever you do, you're not likely to get an infraction as long as you indicate a desire to respect the forum rules.
 
  • #4


Ok sounds good, thank you.
 

1. What is the definition of a "published philosopher"?

A published philosopher is someone who has had their ideas or work on philosophy published in a reputable academic or scholarly publication, such as a journal, book, or conference proceedings.

2. Can self-published works count towards being a "published philosopher"?

In most cases, self-published works do not count towards being a published philosopher. This is because self-published works often lack the rigorous peer-review process and academic credibility that is required for publications to be considered reputable.

3. Do popular articles or blogs count as being published as a philosopher?

No, popular articles or blogs do not typically count as being published as a philosopher. These types of publications are often not subjected to the same level of peer-review and scrutiny as academic publications.

4. Can unpublished works still contribute to someone's status as a "published philosopher"?

Unpublished works, such as drafts or working papers, do not typically contribute to someone's status as a published philosopher. However, they may still be valuable in showcasing a philosopher's ideas and thought process.

5. Is there a specific number of publications needed to be considered a "published philosopher"?

There is no specific number of publications needed to be considered a published philosopher. The quality and impact of the publications are more important factors in determining this status.

Similar threads

  • Feedback and Announcements
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
3
Views
881
Replies
7
Views
423
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
90
Views
19K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • Feedback and Announcements
Replies
1
Views
403
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Sticky
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • Feedback and Announcements
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top